Abstract
Uncertainty is a constant concern in the design and development of complex systems. Managing it is important for organizations since it fosters design process improvement and optimization. This paper presents a method aiming to support large organizations understanding, quantifying and communicating uncertainty levels that normally arise during the early stage of the design process. This stage is particularly affected by decision-making uncertainty because designers and engineers have not yet acquired sufficient knowledge or possess sufficient confidence to decide what is the precise value that should be assigned to design variables in order to satisfy the customer’s needs in an optimal manner. This type of uncertainty has been coined in literature as imprecision. The method proposed in this paper relies on the statistical characterization of the typical level of imprecision that should be expected by designers and engineers based on the collection of historical records of change from past product development processes. We quantify the level of imprecision based on two proxy variables: the time between changes and the magnitude of change that can be expected in new projects. In addition, our method proposes a Matrix of Imprecision that is capable of communicating uncertainty levels to the participants involved in new product development projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blanchard, B.S., Fabrycky, W.J.: Systems engineering and analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall (2006)
NASA. Systems engineering handbook. National Aeronautics and Space Agency, 1st edn. (2007)
Clarkson, P.J., Simons, C., Eckert, C.: Predicting change propagation in complex design. Journal of Mechanical Design 126(5), 788–797 (2004)
Giffin, M., Weck, O.D., Bounova, G., Keller, R., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J.: Change propagation analysis in complex technical systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 131(8), 081001 (2009)
Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H.M., Clarkson, P.J.: A multidomain engineering change propagation model to support uncertainty reduction and risk management in design. Journal of Mechanical Design 134(10), 100905 (2012)
Thunnissen, D.P.: Propagating and mitigating uncertainty in the design of complex multidisciplinary systems. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, USA (2005)
Zimmermann, H.J.: An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 122(2), 190–198 (2000)
Tsui, K.L.: An overview of taguchi method and newly developed statistical methods for robust design. IIE Trans. 24(5), 44–57 (1992)
Chen, W., Allen, J.K., Tsui, K.L., Mistree, F.: A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. Journal of Mechanical Design 118(4), 478–485 (1996)
Kapur, K.C., Lamberson, L.R.: Reliability in engineering design, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1977)
Cornell, C.A.: A probability-based structural code. Journal of American Concrete Institute 66(12), 974–985 (1969)
Goh, Y.M., McMahon, C.A., Booker, J.D.: Development and characterization of error functions in design. Research in Engineering Design 18(3), 129–148 (2007)
Arendt, P.D., Appley, D.W., Chen, W.: Quantification of model uncertainty: calibration, model discrepancy, and identifiability. Journal of Mechanical Design 134(10), 100908 (2012)
Sinha, A., Bera, N., Allen, J.K., Panchal, J.H., Mistree, F.: Uncertainty management in the design of multiscale systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 135(1), 011008 (2013)
Wood, K.L., Antonsson, E.K., Beck, J.L.: Representing imprecision in engineering design: comparing fuzzy and probability calculus. Research in Engineering Design 1(3-4), 18703 (1990)
Otto, K.N., Antonsson, E.K.: Design parameter selection in the presence of noise. Research in Engineering Design 6(4), 234–246 (1994)
Antonsson, E.K., Otto, K.N.: Imprecision in engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design 117(B), 25–32 (1995)
de Neufville, R., Scholtes, S.: Flexibility in Engineering Design, 1st edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Moore, R.E.: Interval analysis, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1966)
Cao, L., Rao, S.S.: Optimum design of mechanical systems involving interval parameters. Journal of Mechanical Design 124(3), 465–472 (2002)
Nikolaidis, E., Chen, S., Cudney, H., Haftka, R.T., Rosca, R.: Comparison of probability and possibility for design against catastrophic failure under uncertainty. Journal of Mechanical Design 126(3), 386–394 (2004)
Mourelatos, Z.P., Zhou, J.: Reliability estimation and design with insufficient data based on possibility theory. AIAA Journal 43(8), 1696–1705 (2005)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory, 1st edn. Plenum Press, New York (1988)
Aughenbaugh, J.M., Paredis, C.J.: The value of using imprecise probabilities in engineering design. Journl of Mechanical Design 128(4), 969–979 (2006)
Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities, 1st edn. Chapmal Hall, London (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fernandes, J., Henriques, E., Silva, A. (2014). A Method for Managing Uncertainty Levels in Design Variables during Complex Product Development. In: Aiguier, M., Boulanger, F., Krob, D., Marchal, C. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02812-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02812-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02811-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02812-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)