Skip to main content

Handling Complexity in System of Systems Projects – Lessons Learned from MBSE Efforts in Border Security Projects

  • Conference paper
Book cover Complex Systems Design & Management

Abstract

Well-established systems engineering approaches are becoming more inadequate as today’s systems are becoming more complex, more global, more COTS/re-use based and more evolving. Increased level of outsourcing, significant amount of subcontractors, more integration than development, reduced project cycles, ecosystem like collaborative developments, software product lines and global development are some of the changes in the project life cycle approaches. By structuring data into views with a common language and format, architecture frameworks can be utilized as tools for managing system complexity. In EADS, both architecture frameworks and MBSE are considered as major areas in the future of contemporary systems engineering practices. In this paper, we share our experiences towards adopting MBSE in border security projects where the role of EADS is the system of systems integrator. From the practitioner’s point of view, lessons learned presented in this paper can help companies to increase the speed of shift from traditional systems engineering approaches to architecture driven, knowledge focused and model-based systems engineering practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, F.P.: No Silver Bullet. IEEE Computer 20(4), 10–19 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Wade, J., Madni, A., Neill, C., Cloutier, R., Turner, R., Korfiatis, P., Carrigy, A., Boehm, B., Tarchalski, S.: Development of 3-Year Roadmap to Transform the Discipline of Systems Engineering. Final Technical Report-SERC-2009-TR-006, Systems Engineering Research Center (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Highsmith, J., Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: the business of innovation. IEEE 34(9), 120–127 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilb, T.: Competitive Engineering. In: Competitive Engineering. Elsevier (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm, B.: Some future trends and implications for systems and software engineering processes. Systems Engineering 9(1), 1–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner, R.: Toward Agile Systems Engineering Processes. CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 11–15 (April 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy, M.R., Umphress, D.A., Ph, D.: An Agile Systems Engineering Process The Missing Link? CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering 4(3), 16–20 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosch, J., Bosch-Sijtsema, P.: From integration to composition: On the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystem. Journal of Systems and Software 83(1), 67–76 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ISO and IEC (International Organisation for Standardisation and International Electrotechnical Commission). ISO/IEC 15288. Systems and software engineering- System life cycle processes (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haskins, C. (ed.): Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. Version 3.2. INCOSE, San Diego (2010), revised by M. Krueger, D. Walden, and R. D. Hamelin.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Asan, E., Bilgen, S.: Agile collaborative systems engineering-motivation for a novel approach to systems engineering. INCOSE, Rome (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maier, M., Emery, D., Hilliard, R.: ANSI/IEEE 1471 and Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering 7(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. INCOSE, Systems Engineering Vision 2020, INCOSE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. NASA, Systems Engineering Handbook (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evans, E.J.: Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison-Wesley Longman (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asan, E., Bilgen, S.: Agility problems in traditional systems engineering – a case study. In: CSDM, Paris, pp. 53–70 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emrah Asan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asan, E., Albrecht, O., Bilgen, S. (2014). Handling Complexity in System of Systems Projects – Lessons Learned from MBSE Efforts in Border Security Projects. In: Aiguier, M., Boulanger, F., Krob, D., Marchal, C. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02812-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02812-5_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02811-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02812-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics