Abstract
Based on cases of Innovators Market Game (IMG), a gamified workshop where each participant plays the role of an inventor who creates and proposes actions in business, or of a consumer who evaluates the quality of those proposals, we investigated how proposed ideas can be, or can be revised to be, acceptable via the workshop. The analysis in this paper has been conducted on the data of players’ log of argumentation - indirectly observable on the game-board where demands of consumers and proposed solutions of inventors are written reflecting the arguments in the workshop. We regard such an argumentation as a process to set the granularity of an argument suitable for putting into action. Based on the original constraint-based representation of classification of conflicts between a consumer and an inventor, that reflects the positions of latent constraints and intentions, we analyzed players’ “written” log of argumentation in order to learn strategies for manipulating intentions and constraints of participants toward the creation of acceptable solutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mohammed, S., Ringseis, E.: Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85(2), 310–335 (2001)
Ohsawa, Y., Nishihara, Y.: Innovators’ Marketplace: Using Games to Activate and Train Innovators. Springer (2012)
Ohsawa, Y., Benson, N.E., Yachida, M.: KeyGraph: Automatic Indexing by Co-occurrence Graph based on Building Construction Metaphor. In: Proc. Advanced Digital Library Conference, IEEE ADL 1998, pp. 12–18 (1998)
Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P.: Chance Discovery. Springer (2003)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–357 (1995)
Walton, D.: Media argumentation – Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press (2007)
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Prakken, H.: Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 247–258 (2006)
Atkinson, K., Bench-capon, T., McBurney, P.: Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152, 157–206 (2006)
Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Argument and Reconciliation. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Legal Reasoning International Symposium on FGCS (1994)
Prakken, H.: Argumentation without arguments. Argumentation 25, 171–184 (2011)
Nishihara, Y., Ohsawa, Y.: Communication Analysis focusing Negative Utterances in Combinatorial Thinking Games. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies 4(2), 31–46 (2010)
Goldratt, E.M.: Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press (1987)
Ohsawa, Y., Akimoto, M.: Unstick Tsugoes for Innovative Interaction of Market Stakeholders. Int’l Journal on Knowledge and Systems Science 4(1), 32–49 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ohsawa, Y., Kido, H., Hayashi, T., Akimoto, M., Fujimoto, M., Tamada, M. (2013). Strategies for Creative Argumentation: Learned from Logs of Innovators Market Game. In: Imamura, K., Usui, S., Shirao, T., Kasamatsu, T., Schwabe, L., Zhong, N. (eds) Brain and Health Informatics. BHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8211. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02752-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02753-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)