Skip to main content

What We Found on Our Way to Building a Classifier: A Critical Analysis of the AHA Screening Questionnaire

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8211))

Abstract

The American Heart Association (AHA) has recommended a 12-element questionnaire for pre-participation screening of athletes, in order to reduce and hopefully prevent sudden cardiac death in young athletes. This screening procedure is widely used throughout the United States, but its efficacy for discriminating Normal from Non-normal heart condition is unclear. As part of a larger study on cardiovascular disorders in young athletes, we set out to train machine-learning-based classifiers to automatically categorize athletes into risk-levels based on their answers to the AHA-questionnaire. We also conducted information-based and probabilistic analysis of each question to identify the ones that may best predict athletes’ heart condition. However, surprisingly, the results indicate that the AHA-recommended screening procedure itself does not effectively distinguish between Normal and Non-normal heart as identified by cardiologists using Electro- and Echo-cardiogram examinations. Our results suggest that ECG and Echo, rather than the questionnaire, should be considered for screening young athletes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corrado, D., et al.: Cardiovascular Pre-Participation Screening of Young Competitive Athletes for Prevention of Sudden Death: Proposal for A Common European Protocol. Consensus statement of the study grp. of Sport Cardiology, of the wrk. grp. of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the wrk. grp. of Myocardial and Pericardial Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart J. 26(5), 516–524 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maron, B.J.: Sudden Death in Young Athletes. New England J. of Medicine 349(11), 1064–1075 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pigozzi, F., Rizzo, M.: Sudden Death in Competitive Athletes. Clinics in Sports Medicine 27(1), 153–181 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wever-Pinzon, O.E., et al.: Sudden Cardiac Death in Young Competitive Athletes Due to Genetic Cardiac Abnormalities. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 9(suppl. 2), 17–23 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corrado, D., et al.: Screening for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Young Athletes. New England J. of Medicine 339(6), 364–369 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maron, B.J., et al.: Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening of Competitive Athletes: A Statement for Health Professionals From the Sudden Death Committee (Clinical Cardiology) and Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee (Cardiovascular Disease in the Young). Circulation 94(4), 850–856 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glover, D.W., Maron, B.J.: Evolution in the Process of Screening United States High School Student-athletes for Cardiovascular Disease. American J. of Cardiology 100(11), 1709–1712 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maron, B.J., et al.: Recommendations and Considerations Related to Preparticipation Screening for Cardiovascular Abnormalities in Competitive Athletes: 2007 Update: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabol. Circulation 115(12), 1643–1655 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanagalingam, J., et al.: Efficacy of the American Heart Association Questionnaire in Identifying Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Abnormalities in Young Athletes During Community-based Screening. Circulation 122(21), A19765 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melgani, F., Bazi, Y.: Classification of Electrocardiogram Signals with Support Vector Machines and Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Trans. on Information Technology in Biomedicine 12(5), 667–677 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Osowski, S., Hoai, L.T., Markiewicz, T.: Support Vector Machine-Based Expert System for Reliable Heartbeat Recognition. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Eng. 51(4), 582–589 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chazal, P.D., et al.: Automatic Classification of Heartbeats using ECG Morphology and Heartbeat Interval Features. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Eng. 51(7), 1196–1206 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, S., Chou, K.: Integration of Independent Component Analysis and Neural Networks for ECG Beat Classification. Expert Systems with Applications 34(4), 2841–2846 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qu, L., et al.: A Naïve Bayes Classifier for Differential Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome in Children. In: Int. Conf. on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, pp. 433–437 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Akay, M.F.: Support Vector Machines Combined with Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications 36(2), 3240–3247 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chhatwal, J., et al.: A Logistic Regression Model Based on the National Mammography Database Format to Aid Breast Cancer Diagnosis. American J. of Roentgenology 192(4), 1117–1127 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Statnikov, A., Wang, L.: A Comprehensive Comparison of Random Forests and Support Vector Machines for Microarray-Based Cancer Classification. BMC Bioinformatics 9(1), 319 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector Networks. Machine Learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, M., et al.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: an Update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walpole, R., et al.: Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Prentice Hall (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rahman, Q.A., Kanagalingam, S., Pinheiro, A., Abraham, T., Shatkay, H. (2013). What We Found on Our Way to Building a Classifier: A Critical Analysis of the AHA Screening Questionnaire. In: Imamura, K., Usui, S., Shirao, T., Kasamatsu, T., Schwabe, L., Zhong, N. (eds) Brain and Health Informatics. BHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8211. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02752-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02753-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics