Advertisement

Ranking Cricket Teams through Runs and Wickets

  • Ali Daud
  • Faqir Muhammad
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8210)

Abstract

Teams are ranked to show their authority over each other. The International Cricket Council (ICC) ranks the cricket teams using an ad-hoc points system entirely based on the winning and losing of matches. In this paper, adoptions of PageRank and h-index are proposed for ranking teams to overcome the weakness of ICC ad-hoc point system. The intuition is to get more points for a team winning from a stronger team than winning from a weaker team by considering the number of runs and wickets also in addition to just winning and losing matches. The results show that proposed ranking methods provide quite promising insights of one day and test team rankings.

Keywords

indexing ranking cricket teams runs and wickets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey, M.J., Clarke, S.R.: Market inefficiencies in player head to head betting on the 2003 cricket world cup. Economics, Management and Optimization in Sport 11, 185–201 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borooah, V.K., Mangan, J.E.: The “Bradman class”: An exploration of some issues in the evaluation of batsmen for test matches, 1877 - 2006. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 6(3) (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bracewell, P.J., Ruggiero, K.: A parametric control chart for monitoring individual batting performances in cricket. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 5, 1–16 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burrell, Q.L.: Hirsch’s h-index: a stochastic model. Journal of Informetrics 1(1), 16–25Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duch, J., Waitzman, J.S., Amaral, L.A.N.: Quantifying the performance of individual players in a team activity. PLoS One 5, e10937 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Egghe, L.: Theory and Practice of the g-index. Jointly published by Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest and Springer, Dordrecht; Scientometrics 69(1), 131–152 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haveliwala, T.H.: Topic-sensitive PageRank. In: Proc. of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 517–526 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual research output. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 16569–16572 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ivn, G., Grolmusz, V.: When the Web Meets the Cell: Using Personalized Page Rank for Analyzing Protein Interaction Networks. Biofinformatics 27(3), 405–407 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manaskasemsak, B., Rungsawang, A., Yamana, H.: Time-weighted web authoritative ranking. Information Retrieval Journal 14(2), 133–157 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mukherjee, S.: Identifying the greatest team and captain: A complex network approach to cricket matches. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391(23), 6066–6076 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Libraries SIDL-WP-1999-0120 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xing, W., Ghorbani, A.: Weighted PageRank Algorithm. In: Proc. of 2nd Annual Conference on Communication Networks and Services Research, pp. 305–314 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Daud
    • 1
  • Faqir Muhammad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & Software EngineeringIIUIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationAUIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations