Skip to main content

xMOF: Executable DSMLs Based on fUML

  • Conference paper
Software Language Engineering (SLE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8225))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The basic ingredients of a domain-specific modeling language (DSML) are its syntax and semantics. For defining the abstract syntax in terms of metamodels, MOF constitutes a standardized language. For specifying the behavioral semantics, however, no standardized language exists, which hampers the emergence of model execution facilities, such as debugging and simulation support. The contribution of this paper is an integrated approach for specifying the abstract syntax and behavioral semantics of DSMLs based exclusively on standardized modeling languages. In particular, we integrate fUML, a standardized executable subset of UML, with MOF leading to a new metamodeling language xMOF. Moreover, we propose a methodology for developing executable DSMLs fostering the separation of abstract syntax and behavioral semantics. To evaluate our approach, we provide an EMF-based implementation and report on lessons learned from performing three case studies in which we implemented executable DSMLs using xMOF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bryant, B.R., Gray, J., Mernik, M., Clarke, P.J., France, R.B., Karsai, G.: Challenges and directions in formalizing the semantics of modeling languages. Computer Science and Information Systems 8(2), 225–253 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, K., Sztipanovits, J., Abdelwalhed, S., Jackson, E.: Semantic anchoring with model transformations. In: Hartman, A., Kreische, D. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3748, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, T., Evans, A., Sammut, P., Willans, J.: Applied Metamodelling: A Foundation for Language Driven Development. Ceteva, Sheffield (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ducasse, S., Gîrba, T.: Using Smalltalk as a Reflective Executable Meta-language. In: Wang, J., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 604–618. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Engels, G., Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Sauer, S.: Dynamic Meta Modeling: A Graphical Approach to the Operational Semantics of Behavioral Diagrams in UML. In: Evans, A., Caskurlu, B., Selic, B. (eds.) UML 2000. LNCS, vol. 1939, pp. 323–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Grönniger, H., Ringert, J.O., Rumpe, B.: System Model-Based Definition of Modeling Language Semantics. In: Lee, D., Lopes, A., Poetzsch-Heffter, A. (eds.) FMOODS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5522, pp. 152–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kats, L.C.L., Visser, E.: The Spoofax language workbench. In: Companion to the 25th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA), pp. 237–238. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: The Epsilon Object Language (EOL). In: Rensink, A., Warmer, J. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4066, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kühne, T.: Matters of (Meta-)Modeling. Software and System Modeling 5(4), 369–385 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kühne, T., Mezei, G., Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H., Wimmer, M.: Explicit Transformation Modeling. In: Ghosh, S. (ed.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 6002, pp. 240–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurtev, I., Bézivin, J., Aksit, M.: Technological Spaces: An Initial Appraisal. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications, DOA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lai, Q., Carpenter, A.: Defining and verifying behaviour of domain specific language with fUML. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Behaviour Modeling - Foundations and Applications (BM-FA) @ ECMFA 2012, pp. 1–7. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Langer, P., Wieland, K., Wimmer, M., Cabot, J.: EMF Profiles: A Lightweight Extension Approach for EMF Models. Journal of Object Technology 11(1), 1–29 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayerhofer, T., Langer, P., Kappel, G.: A runtime model for fUML. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Models@run.time (MRT) @ MoDELS 2012, pp. 53–58. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mayerhofer, T., Langer, P., Wimmer, M.: Towards xMOF: Executable DSMLs based on fUML. In: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM) @ SPLASH 2012, pp. 1–6. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mernik, M., Heering, J., Sloane, A.M.: When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys 37(4), 316–344 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muller, P.-A., Fleurey, F., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Weaving Executability into Object-Oriented Meta-languages. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 264–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group. Action Language for Foundational UML (Alf), Version Beta 1 (October 2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/ALF/1.0/Beta1

  19. Object Management Group. OMG Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, Version 2.4.1 (August 2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.4.1

  20. Object Management Group. Semantics of a Foundational Subset for Executable UML Models (fUML), Version 1.0 (February 2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/FUML/1.0

  21. Paige, R., Brooke, P., Ostroff, J.: Specification-driven development of an executable metamodel in Eiffel. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop in Software Model Engineering (WiSME) @ UML 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rivera, J.E., Durán, F., Vallecillo, A.: On the Behavioral Semantics of Real-Time Domain Specific Visual Languages. In: Ölveczky, P.C. (ed.) WRLA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6381, pp. 174–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheidgen, M., Fischer, J.: Human Comprehensible and Machine Processable Specifications of Operational Semantics. In: Akehurst, D.H., Vogel, R., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMDA-FA. LNCS, vol. 4530, pp. 157–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Soden, M., Eichler, H.: Towards a model execution framework for Eclipse. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Behaviour Modeling - Foundations and Applications (BM-FA) @ ECMFA 2009, pp. 1–7. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sprinkle, J., Rumpe, B., Vangheluwe, H., Karsai, G.: Metamodelling - State of the Art and Research Challenges. In: Giese, H., Karsai, G., Lee, E., Rumpe, B., Schätz, B. (eds.) Model-Based Engineering of Embedded Real-Time Systems. LNCS, vol. 6100, pp. 57–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strembeck, M., Zdun, U.: An approach for the systematic development of domain-specific languages. Software: Practice and Experience 39(15), 1253–1292 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sunyé, G., Guennec, A.L., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Using UML Action Semantics for model execution and transformation. Information Systems 27(6), 445–457 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sunyé, G., Pennaneac’h, F., Ho, W.-M., Le Guennec, A., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Using UML Action Semantics for Executable Modeling and Beyond. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 433–447. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. van den Bos, J., Hills, M., Klint, P., van der Storm, T., Vinju, J.J.: Rascal: From Algebraic Specification to Meta-Programming. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Algebraic Methods in Model-based Software Engineering (AMMSE). EPTCS, vol. 56, pp. 15–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mayerhofer, T., Langer, P., Wimmer, M., Kappel, G. (2013). xMOF: Executable DSMLs Based on fUML. In: Erwig, M., Paige, R.F., Van Wyk, E. (eds) Software Language Engineering. SLE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8225. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02654-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02654-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02653-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02654-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics