Advertisement

Introduction: Why a Philosophy of the Economy and Why an Aristotelian Approach?

  • Ricardo F. CrespoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

This first chapter answers the questions in its heading and describes the outline of the book. It also introduces its central ideas: 1) the economy is essentially a human reality; 2) as such, its study should be approached primarily from the perspective of practical reason; 3) economics should recover its practical stance, drawing away from its recent shift to a more technical realm, and, finally, 4) economic activity is human action in society. This is the lens that should enlighten its analysis and practice.

Keywords

Philosophy of the economy Aristotle and economics Theoretical practical and instrumental reason 

References

  1. Ackrill, J.L. 1981. Aristotle the philosopher. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alvey, J.E. 2011. A short history of ethics and economics. Elgar: The Greeks.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1831, 1836, 1870, 1874. Aristoteles opera, edited by August Immanuel Bekker. Berlin: Academia Regia Borusica.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. 1925, 1954. Nicomachean ethics, transl. Sir David Ross. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean ethics. transl. and introduction by Terence Irwin, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. 1941. The basic works of Aristotle, edited and with an Introduction by Richard McKeon. Random house (reprint of the translations prepared under the editorship of W. D. Ross, New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. 1984. The complete works of Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Aristotle. 1958. The politics of Aristotle, ed. and transl. by Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes, J. 1982. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boudon, R. 2004. Théorie du choix rationnel, théorie de la rationalité limitée ou individualisme méthodologique: que choisir? Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 14(1): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boulding, Kenneth E. 1969. Economics as a Moral Science, American Economic Review, LIX/3: 1–12.Google Scholar
  12. Bulgakov, Sergei. 2000. Philosophy of the economy. The world as a household. Ed., transl. and Introduction by Catherine Evtuhov. UK: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bunge, M. 1985. Economía y filosofía. Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar
  14. Collinwood, R.G. 1945. The idea of nature. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coase, R. 1978. Economics and contiguous disciplines. The Journal of Legal Studies 7(2): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crespo, R.F. 2014. A re-assessment of Aristotle’s economic thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, J.B. 2008. The turn in recent economics and the return of orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 32: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Koninck, C. 1964. The hollow universe. Québec : Les Presses de L’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  19. Dow, S. 2002. Economic methodology: An inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frey, B., and M. Benz. 2004. From imperialism to inspiration: a survey of economics and psychology. In The elgar companion to economics and philosophy, ed. J.B. Davis, A. Marciano, and J. Runde, 61–83. Cheltenham and Northampton: Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Halteman, J., and E. Noell. 2012. Reckoning with markets. Moral reflection in economics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1937. Economics and Knowledge. Economica 4/23: 33–54.Google Scholar
  23. Hume, David. 1739–1740, 1968. A treatise of human nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press (reprinted).Google Scholar
  24. Laertius, Diogenes. The lives and opinions of eminent philosophers, http://www.classicpersuasion.org/pw/diogenes/dlaristotle.htm. Accessed 8 Jan 2013.
  25. MacIntyre, A. 2011. Virtue and politics. Alasdair MacIntyre’s revolutionary aristotelianism. In Where we were, where we are, where we need to be, ed. P. Blackledge, and K. Knight, 307–334. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  26. Meikle, S. 1997. Aristotle’s economic thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pack, Spencer J. 2010. Aristotle, Adam Smith and Karl Marx: On some fundamental issues in 21st century political economy. UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Ross, W.D. 1957. Aristotle. A complete exposition of his works and thought. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, B. 1954. Human society in ethics and politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  30. Shiller, Robert J. and Virginia M. Shiller. 2011. Economists as worldly philosophers, Cowles foundation discussion paper (n. 1788, 2011).Google Scholar
  31. Simon, Yves. 1991. Practical knowledge, ed. by Robert J. Mulvaney. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Skidelsky, R., and E. Skidelsky. 2012. How much is enough. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sorabji, R. 1980. Necessity, cause, and blame. Perspectives on Aristotle’s theory. Ithaca (New York): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sugden, R. 1991. Rational choice: A survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. The Economic Journal 101: 751–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Staveren, Irene. 2001. The values of economics: An Aristotelian perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Whitehead, A.N. 1911. An introduction to mathematics. London: William and Norgate.Google Scholar
  37. Yuengert, Andrew. 2004. The boundaries of technique. Ordering positive and normative concerns in economic research. US: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  38. Yuengert, Andrew. 2012. Approximating prudence: Aristotelian practical wisdom and economic models of choice. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversidad Nacional de Cuyo and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasMendozaArgentina

Personalised recommendations