Which Factors Favor Betting Related Cheating in Sports? Some Insights from Political Economy

  • Luca RebeggianiEmail author
  • Fatma Rebeggiani


In recent years, cheating scandals connected with betting activity have shown to be a major concern for professional sports. From an economic point of view, such scandals threaten the integrity of sport and put the whole commercialization of this good (regarding e.g. sponsoring, broadcasting) in danger. This chapter the incentives for cheating connected to traditional and new bet types in the sports betting sector and how they might affect the behaviur of sportsmen, coaches, and officials. We develop a simple theoretical model and derive from it some political implications which we recommend, among others, for the ongoing reform of the German sports betting market. Our recommendations should contribute to an effective prevention of scandals like those unveiled in European football in the last years.


Cheat Activity Professional Sport Cheat Behavior Online Gambling Sport Federation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Albers, N. (2008): Die Markenstrategie des Deutschen Lotto-Toto-Blocks unter dem Einfluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Discussion Paper No. 408, University of Hannover, School of Economics and Management.Google Scholar
  2. Bag, P., & Saha, B. (2011). Match-fixing under competitive odds. Games and Economic Behavior 73 (2), 318–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, T., & Barth, D. (2012). Der deutsche Glücksspielmarkt: Eine Schätzung des nicht staatlich regulierten Marktvolumens, Newsletter 02/2012 of the Forschungsstelle Glücksspiel at the University of Hohenheim.Google Scholar
  4. Boeri, T., & Severgnini, B. (2011). Match rigging and the career concerns of referees. Labour Economics 18 (3), 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caruso, R. (2009). The Basic Economics of Match Fixing in Sport Tournaments. Economic Analysis and Policy 39 (3), 355–377.Google Scholar
  6. Clement, R., Goudriaan, A. E.,van Holst, R. J., Molinaro, S., Moersen, C., Nilsson, T., Parke, A., Peren, F. W., Rebeggiani, L., Stoever, H., Terlau, W. & Wilhelm, M. (2012). Measuring and Evaluating the Potential Addiction Risk of the Online Poker Game Texas Hold’em No Limit. Gaming Law Review and Economics 16 (10), 713–728.Google Scholar
  7. Coates, D. & Humphreys, B.R. (2008). Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Subsidies for Sports Franchises, Stadiums, and Mega-Events? Econ Journal Watch 5 (3), 294–315.Google Scholar
  8. Dietl, H., & Weingärtner, C. (2012). Betting scandals and attenuated property rights – How betting related match fixing can be prevented in future. University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics Working Paper No. 154.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrlich, I. (1996). Crime, Punishment, and the Market for Offenses. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1), 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Europol (2013). Update – Results from the largest football match-fixing investigation in Europe. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from
  11. Forrest, D., McHale, I., & McAuley, K. (2008). Risk to the Integrity of Sport from Betting Corruption, Report for the Central Council for Physical Recreation, University of Salford.Google Scholar
  12. Forrest, D. & Simmons, R. (2003). Sport and Gambling. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 (4), 598–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gazzetta dello Sport (2013). Calcioscommesse, Di Martino: “L’inchiesta è un pozzo senza fondo”. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from
  14. Goldmedia (2010). Glücksspielmarkt Deutschland 2015, Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, D. (2009). How gambling corruptors fix football matches. European Sport Management Quarterly 9 (4), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IRIS (Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques) et al. (2012). Sports betting and Corruption, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Preston, I., Ross, S.F., & Szymanski, S. (2001). Seizing the moment: A Blueprint for Reform of World Cricket, Working Paper, University College London.Google Scholar
  18. Preston, I., & Szymanski, S. (2003). Cheating in Contests. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 (4), 612–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rebeggiani, L. (2006). Public vs. private spending for sports facilities – The case of Germany 2006. Public Finance and Management 6 (3), 395–435.Google Scholar
  20. Rebeggiani, L. (2009). The Liga Portuguesa Decision of the European Court of Justice – An Economist’s View. Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello Sport 5 (3), 111–122.Google Scholar
  21. Rebeggiani, L. (2010). Deutschland im Jahr Drei des GlüStV - Reformvorschläge zur Regulierung des deutschen Glücksspielmarktes, Report for the German Lotto-Association (Deutscher Lotto-Verband), Hannover.Google Scholar
  22. Rebeggiani, L. (2011). Die Vorschläge der Länder zur Reform des GlüStV – Eine ökonomische Analyse, Report for the German Lottery Association (Lotterie-Initiative), Hannover.Google Scholar
  23. Rebeggiani, L. (2012). Regulierung des deutschen Sportwettenmarktes in komparativer Perspektive – Glücksspielgesetze in der Europäischen Union. In: M. P. Büch, W. Maennig, & H.-J. Schulke (Eds.), Sport und Sportgroßveranstaltungen in Europa – Zwischen Zentralstaat und Regionen (pp. 51–78), Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Spiegel Online (2013): “Wir brauchen den Straftatbestand des Sportbetrugs”. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from
  25. Sportradar (2013). Die Bekämpfung von wettbezogener Manipulation im Sport, presentation given by A. Krannich (Sportradar) at the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Bonn, 4th February 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Strumpf, K. (2003). Illegal Sports Bookmakers. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Winter, S., & Kukuk, M. (2008). Do Horses Like Vodka and Sponging? - On Market Manipulation and the favourite-longshot bias. Applied Economics, 40 (1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolfers, J. (2006). Point Shaving: Corruption in NCAA Basketball. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 96 (5), 279–283.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Research Institute for Gambling and GamingSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.Bremen International Graduate School of Social SciencesUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations