Abstract
This chapter reviews the essential learning outcomes that students develop through a 21st century liberal education, along with principal themes in the literature about higher education in the 21st century. This chapter shows examples of high impact liberal education practices in both European and American colleges and universities. This chapter also discusses the role of emerging technologies and STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) fields in liberal education. Questions to be addressed include the following: What kind of liberal education curriculum and learning environment can better prepare university students for success in the 21st century workplace? Why is liberal education necessary? What is the role of emerging technologies to meet the liberal education learning outcomes? Principle themes in the literature and implications of liberal education are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AAC&U. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U).
AAC&U. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U).
AAC&U. (2011). LEAP vision for learning: Outcomes, practices, impact, and employers’ views. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U).
Adler, M. (1988). Reforming education: The opening of the American mind. Edited by Geraldine Van Doren. New York: Macmillan.
Ahrache, El. S. I., Badir, H., Tabaa, Y., & Medouri, A. (2013). Massive open online courses: A new dawn for higher education? International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 5(5), 323–327.
Arcilla, R. V. (2007). The question of liberal education. Liberal Education, Spring 2007.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press.
Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2011). From gathering to using assessment results. NILOA Occasional. Paper, 8.
Bowen, J. A. (2012). Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your college classroom will improve student learning. San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint.
Bridges, D. (2000). Back to the future: the higher education curriculum in the 21st century. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1)
BU (2013). Brown University (BU) liberal learning goals. http://www.brown.edu/Administration/Registrar/concentrationforms/LiberalLearningGoals.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2014.
Burns, G. (2002). Liberal education at Franklin Pierce. Fall: Franklin Pierce University.
DomÃnguez, J. I. (2004). Liberal education at Harvard in this new century. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic733185.files/Dominguez.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2014.
EQF. (2006). The European qualifications framework (EQF): A new way to understand qualifications across Europe. European Commission. – IP/06/1148 05/09/2006.
Fong, B. (2004). Liberal education in the 21st century. Liberal Education, Winter 2004.
Gore, H. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and their impact on academic library services: Exploring the issues and challenges. Bucks: The Open University.
Guerra, M. (2013). The place of liberal education in contemporary higher education. Symposium: Higher Education and The Challenges of Reform. Soc, 50, 251–256.
Harris, R. (2010). On the purpose of a liberal arts education. http://www.virtualsalt.com/libarted.htm. Accessed 14 March 2014.
Hart Research Associates. (2013). It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U).
Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., Ladd, B., Pearon, J., & Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541–546.
Mehaffy, G. L. (2012). Challenge and change. Educause Review, 45(5).
Nussbaum, M. (2004). Liberal education and global community. Liberal Education, Winter 2004.
QAA. (2008). The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (FHEQ). The Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) for Higher Education 2008, UK.
Riordan, T. (2005). Education for the 21st century: Teaching, learning, and assessment. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(1), 52–56.
Rossing, J. P. (2012). Mobile technology and liberal education. Liberal Education, Winter 2012, p. 70.
Roth, M. (2013). An anti-traditional tradition: The American idea of liberal education. Social Sciences in China, 34(2), 96–104.
Shinn, L. D. (2012). Liberal education in the age of the unthinkable. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(4), 15–21.
Skolnik, M. L. (1998). Higher Education in the 21st century. Perspectives on an emerging body of literature. Futures, 30(7), 635–650.
Stearns, P. (2010). Global education and liberal education. Liberal Education, Summer 2010.
Summit, J. (2013). Global citizenship demands new approaches to teaching and learning: AASCU’s global challenges initiative. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 51–57.
VT. (2013). Curriculum for liberal education: A guide for students, advisors & faculty. Virginia Tech (VT), 2013–2014.
Williams, R. A., Zdravkovich, V., & Engleberg, I. (2002). Liberal education. Why now? Why for all? (pp. 34–41). Fall: Liberal Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gogus, A. (2015). Reconceptualizing Liberal Education in the 21st Century. In: Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. (eds) Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02572-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02573-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)