Skip to main content

Overuse, Scarcity, and the Debate About Sustainable Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development Patterns of Material Productivity

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 585 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter lists five exemplary areas where overuse of natural resources can be observed: those include climate change, the overuse of renewable resources, the use of nonrenewable resources and its consequences, the destruction of ecosystems, species, and landscapes, as well as threats to human health. The economic reasons for an overuse of natural resources are discussed briefly. The most important factors in this context are poorly defined property rights and public good characteristics inherent in some natural resources. Besides economic factors, a variety of other contributing factors such as population growth, economic growth, economic structure, consumption patterns, or technology are mentioned. As a consequence to the overuse of natural resources, sustainability and environmental policies, such as the Flagship Initiative for a Resource Efficient Europe by the European Union as well as “Green Growth” initiatives, for instance by the OECD or the UNEP have been initiated and their main aspects are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more details, see also OECD (2001c).

  2. 2.

    An overview on the arguments regarding the necessity to protect biodiversity can be found, for instance, in Bergstrom and Randall (2010, pp. 380, 400–401).

  3. 3.

    See, e.g., Tietenberg and Lewis (2009, p. 71) for the well-known river example.

  4. 4.

    Especially the aspects discounting of future damages and the role of economic growth play in environmental degradation are discussed extensively. See, e.g., Bergstrom and Randall (2010, Chap. 7) and Neumayer (2010) for the debate on discounting.

  5. 5.

    The question whether economic growth automatically improves environmental quality is at the center in the debate about the environmental Kuznets curve. The environmental Kuznets curve postulates an inverted-U relationship between pollution and economic development. Neumayer (2010) presents an overview on economic growth and the environment as well as the environmental Kuznets curve, and Tietenberg and Lewis (2009) also discuss the Kuznets curve.

  6. 6.

    Measures to examine weak sustainability include Genuine Savings and the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) or Genuine Progress Indicators. The most important indicators for strong sustainability are physical indicators like ecological footprints and material flows as well as hybrid indicators combining physical indicators with monetary valuation, such as the Greened National Statistical and Modelling Procedures (GREENSTAMP), the so-called sustainability gaps, and the sustainable national income according to Hueting (SNI) (Neumayer 2010).

  7. 7.

    An overview over international as well as European environmental policy can be found in von Weizsäcker (2009).

  8. 8.

    See, for example, Dujmovits (2010).

References

  • Bergstrom JC, Randall A (2010) Resource economics. An economic approach to natural resource and environmental policy, 3rd edn. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2006) Umweltbericht 2006 Umwelt – Innovation – Beschäftigung. Edited by Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU) Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujmovits R (2010) Nicht erneuerbare Ressourcen, Grenzen des Wachstums und Fallstricke des technologischen Optimismus. In: Hagemann H (ed) Nachhaltige Entwicklung – das neue Paradigma in der Ökonomie. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 155–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Endres A (2007) Umweltökonomie. Lehrbuch, 3rd edn. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011b) Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2011) 571 final. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2005) Sustainable use and management of natural resources. EEA report. Edited by European Environment Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (2009) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2008. Edited by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rom

    Google Scholar 

  • Faucheux S, Noël J-F (2001) Ökonomie natürlicher Ressourcen und der Umwelt. Metropolis, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Förstner U (2008) Umweltschutztechnik. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. Edited by World Resources Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (2010) Weak versus strong sustainability. Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms, 3rd edn. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001c) OECD environmental outlook. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001d) Sustainable development critical issues. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011b) Tools for delivering on green growth. OECD, Paris. Available at http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/48012326.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2013

  • OECD (2011c) Towards green growth. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D, Atkinson G (1996) Measuring sustainable development. In: Bromley DW (ed) Handbook of environmental economics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 166–181, Reprinted

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey J (1992) Sustainable development concepts. An economic analysis. The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E et al (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogall H (2008) Ökologische Ökonomie. Eine Einführung, 2nd edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (GWV), Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieferle RP (1988) Chemie und Umwelt – Versuch einer historischen Standortbestimmung. In: Held M (ed) Chemiepolitik: Gespräch über eine neue Kontroverse. Beiträge und Ergebnisse einer Tagung der Evangelischen Akademie Tutzing. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Available at http://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz259464333vlg.pdf

  • Tietenberg TH, Lewis L (2009) Environmental and natural resource economics. Pearson, Boston. Available at http://digitool.hbz-nrw.de:1801/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=2627001&custom_att_2=simple_viewer

  • UNEP (2011a) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2011b) Towards a green economy. Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2009) World population prospects: the 2008 revision. Highlights. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.210

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker EU (2009) Factor five. Transforming the global economy through 80 % improvements in resource productivity; a report to the Club of Rome. Earthscan/The Natural Edge Project, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talmon-Gros, L. (2014). Overuse, Scarcity, and the Debate About Sustainable Development. In: Development Patterns of Material Productivity. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02538-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics