Skip to main content

Role of Flexibility in Sustainable Port Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infranomics

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 24))

Abstract

Sustainability has become a high profile objective in all aspects of our lives, including the development of our infrastructures. Flexibility can enhance sustainability endeavors, yet its contribution is not clear to most. In this chapter, authors investigate the role of flexibility in sustainable port development in order to promote its incorporation in port projects. We establish that the greatest payoffs from flexibility are achieved through initiating new life cycle for a capital-intensive port infrastructure, though reuse of the elements and materials also contributes to flexibility . Reuse concurrently optimizes use of natural resources, limits waste and pollution in the environment, conserves energy, and thus limits the overall negative ecological impact. It also results in significantly lowers lifecycle costs. Thus, flexibility helps achieve (long-term) financial viability in face of economic uncertainty, while reducing environmental and social impacts. Therefore, flexibility considerations are important during design, procurement, and contracting of engineering projects. The best way to redirect the choice of decision-makers towards flexibility is to make visible its long-term benefits, and its contribution to sustainability . We discuss some evaluation methods and propose that the quantitative methods are more likely make a case for flexibility .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.civ.utoronto.ca/sir/default.htm.

  2. 2.

    Economisch meest voordelige inschrijving.

  3. 3.

    http://www.oecdguidelines.nl/guidelines/general-humanrights/.

References

  1. Flint RW (2010) Symbolism of sustainability: means of operationalizing the concept, synesis. J Sci Technol Ethics Policy 1(1):T25–T37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Willard B (2002) The sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line (Conscientious Commerce). New Society Publishers, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greden LV (2005) Flexibility in building design: a real options approach and methodology to address risk. Phd Thesis, Massachusetts institute of Technology (MIT)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Neufville R (2006) Valuing options by spreadsheet: parking garage case example. ASCE J Infrastruct Syst 12(2):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sullivan A, Sheffrin SM (2003) Economics: principles in action, vol 07458. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 474

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hinds AA (2008) Sustainability—an imperative for the port and maritime industries, AAPA port sustainability task force. Doing well by doing good: ports and the sustainability challenge. AAPA port finance seminar, 10–12 June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Bank and IBRD (2007) Port reform toolkit: effective support for policymakers and practitioners (2nd edn). Available http://www.ppiaf.org/documents/toolkits/Portoolkit/. Accessed 1 Apr 2008

  8. Transnet (2010) Port sustainability and environmental challenge: a South African perspective. In: The 1st eastern and southern ports environmental mangers working conference, 20–22 Sept 2010, Mombasa, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moses J (2004) Foundational issues in engineering systems: a framing paper. Available http://esd.mit.edu/symposium/pdfs/monograph/framing.pdf. accessed on 1 Apr 2008

  10. Dovers SR, Handmer JW (1992) Uncertainty, sustainability and change. Glob Environ Change. Available http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959378092900448. Accessed 1 Apr 2012

  11. Sanchez RJ, Wilmsmeier G (2005) Short sea shipping in Central America to bridge infrastructural gaps. Marit Policy Manage 32(3):227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bettis RA, Hitt MA (1995) The new competitive landscape. Strateg Manag J 16:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dovers S (1991) Diverse and resilient approaches to sustainable development. In: Harding R (ed) Proceedings. Ecopolitics V Conference, Sydney, 4–7 Apr 1991, University of New South Wales, Sydney, pp 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scholtes S (2007) Flexibility: the secret to transforming risk into opportunities. Bus Dig 174:6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cutcher-Gershenfield JF, Field F, Hall R, Kirchain R, Marks D, Oye K, Sussman J (2004) Sustainability as an organizing design principle for large-scale engineering systems. Paper presented at the MIT Engineering Systems Symposium, 29–31 Mar 2004. MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Available http://esd.mit.edu/symposium/monograph, Accessed 1 Apr 2008

  16. Taneja P, Aartsen ME, Annema JA, Ligteringen H (2010) Investment appraisal for sustainable ports. In: Proceedings of 3e international conference on next generation infrastructure systems for eco-cities, 11–13 Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sijtsma FJ (2006) Project evaluation, sustainability and accountability: combining cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and multi-criteria analysis (MCA). PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  18. van den Dobbelsteen A, Alberts K (2001) Milieueffecten van bouwmaterialen: duurzaam omgaan met grondstoffen. Available http://www.wegwijzerduurzaambouwen.be/pdf/174.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2009

  19. Willcocks L (1994) Information management: the evaluation of information systems investments. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Milis K, Snoeck M, Haesen R (2009) Evaluation of the applicability of investment appraisal techniques for assessing the business value of IS services. Available https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/247210. Accessed 1 Apr 2009

  21. Ros R (2011) Flexible Infrastructures for Maasvlakte 2. MSc thesis, Delft University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taneja P, van Turnhout B, Aartsen ME (2011) Infrastructure planning under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 4e international conference on next generation infrastructure systems for eco-cities, 16–18 Nov 2011, Norfolk, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is carried out within the framework of Port Research Centre Rotterdam-Delft and Next Generation Infrastructures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poonam Taneja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taneja, P., Vellinga, T., Ros, R. (2014). Role of Flexibility in Sustainable Port Development. In: Gheorghe, A., Masera, M., Katina, P. (eds) Infranomics. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02493-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02493-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02492-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02493-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics