Skip to main content

How Did Design Alchemy Emerge?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Alchemy

Part of the book series: Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations ((ECTII,volume 8))

  • 1315 Accesses

Abstract

As presented in Chaps. 1 and 2, the relevance of Design Alchemy is based on integrating the scientific and artistic approaches to design (alchemy), recapturing the engagement potential of computers and learning (magic), rediscovering the value of design traditions (quality) and differentiating design practice for technological innovation (pedagogy). The purpose of this chapter is to introduce five specific areas of research which have informed the development of the Design Alchemy architecture: the art of interactivity, proactive evaluation, three-phase design, design for learning and proactive design for learning. Each of these reveals nascent elements of the framework and explains the evolutionary process from which the main components and elements of Design Alchemy emerged. Together these provide the background for the final section of the chapter, which articulates the major components of Design Alchemy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Sheldrake.

  2. 2.

    In 2001 Creative Commons was formed (http://creativecommons.org/about/history) with the aim of enabling the sharing and use of creativity and knowledge through free legal tools.

  3. 3.

    A search of Google for ‘interview techniques’ revealed 108,000,000 hits and a search for ‘oer interview techniques’ 86,000 hits including open courses.

References

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, M., & Sims, R. (1987). Computer-assisted learning in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34(2), 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irlbeck, S., Kays, E., Jones, D., & Sims, R. (2006). The phoenix rising: Emergent models of instructional design. Distance Education, 27(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (Ed.). (1988). Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays, E. & Sims, R. (2006). Reinventing and reinvigorating instructional design: A theory for emergent learning. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who’s Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 409–412). Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanarca Declaration. (2012). Lanarca declaration on learning design. Available from http://larnacadeclaration.wordpress.com/full-document/. Accessed September 10, 2013.

  • Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C., & O‘Reilly, M. (1999). Assessing open and distance learners. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA). (1998). Stage struck. [CD-ROM]. Australia on CD Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannafino, J. (2012). Interdisciplinary interaction design: A visual guide to basic theories, models and ideas for thinking and designing for interactive web design and digital device experiences. USA: Assiduous Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. (2012). Interactive design: An introduction to the theory and application of user-centered design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, D. M., & Azbell, J. W. (1985). Designing interactive video instruction professionally. Training and Development Journal, 39(12), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwier, R. A., & Misanchuk, E. (1993). Interactive multimedia instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrake, R. (2011). The presence of the past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. London: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (1997). Interactivity: A forgotten art? Computers in Human Behavior, 13(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (2000). Learners as actors: Strategies for computer-enhanced learning encounters. Unpublished Ph.D., thesis, Wollongong University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (2006). Beyond instructional design: Making learning design a reality. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 1–8. (Keynote Paper) Available from http://www.jld.qut.edu.au/. Accessed May 16, 2006.

  • Sims, R. (2009). From three-phase to proactive learning design: Creating effective online teaching and learning environments. In J. Willis (Ed.), Constructivist instructional design (C-ID): Foundations, models, and practical examples (pp. 379–391). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (2012). Reappraising design practice. In D. Holt, S. Segrave, & J. Cybulski (Eds.), Professional education using e-simulations: Benefits of blended learning design. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., Dobbs, G., & Hand, T. (2002). Enhancing quality in online learning: Scaffolding design and planning through proactive evaluation. Distance Education, 23(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Encounter theory: A model to enhancing online communication, interaction and engagement. In C. Jawah (Ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice. London: Routledge Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., & Jones, D. (2003). Where practice informs theory: Reshaping instructional design for academic communities of practice in online teaching and learning. Information Technology, Education and Society, 4(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, J. R. R. (1954). The fellowship of the ring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sims, R. (2014). How Did Design Alchemy Emerge?. In: Design Alchemy. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02423-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics