Advertisement

Excursus: EU Fundamental Rights in EU Gambling Law

  • Simon Planzer
Chapter
Part of the Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation book series (SEELR, volume 1)

Abstract

EU fundamental rights have so far not been dealt with in the gambling jurisprudence; this chapter discusses their potential role. It starts by presenting the development of EU fundamental rights in the case law and the drafting of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

The chapter then identifies the relevant fundamental rights. Gambling activities can fall under the ambit of the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16), the freedom to choose an occupation and the right to engage in work (Article 15) as well the freedom of expression and information (Article 11) in relation to advertising. With regard to the rights’ interpretation and their level of protection, the Charter of Fundamental Rights contains guiding principles, which are discussed.

Importantly, the relationship between EU fundamental rights and EU fundamental freedoms is clarified. Where both ‘rights’ and ‘freedoms’ are applicable, a twofold test applies: Are there measures available that would be less restrictive of both intra-Union trade and EU fundamental rights? Additionally, restrictions must respect the essence of fundamental rights (‘Kerngehalt’).

Finally, the last section examines whether the legal situation changed with the Lisbon Treaty, in particular regarding the scope of application. Prior to that treaty, the Court had expanded the scope in the judgments ERT and Familiapress to include facts that ‘fall within the scope of Community law’. At first sight, the Charter seems to re-diminish the scope as it applies to ‘the Member States only when they are implementing Union law’. However, a thorough analysis of the ‘travaux préparatoires’ illustrates that the situation is much more ambiguous.

Keywords

Member State Advocate General Fundamental Freedom Lisbon Treaty Constitutional Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Gebauer, K. (2007). Parallele Grund- und Menschenrechtsschutzsysteme in Europa? Ein Vergleich der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention und des Strassburger Gerichtshofs mit dem Grundrechtsschutz in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und dem Luxemburger Gerichtshof (Hamburger Studien zum Europäischen und Internationalen Recht, Vol. 45). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  2. Baudenbacher, C. (2008). The goal of homogeneous interpretation of the law in the European Economic Area: Two courts and two separate legal orders, but law that is essentially identical in substance. The European Legal Forum, 8(1), 22–31.Google Scholar
  3. Kombos, C. (2006). Fundamental rights and fundamental freedoms: A symbiosis on the basis of subsidiarity. European Public Law, 12(3), 433–460.Google Scholar
  4. Baudenbacher, C. (2007c). Fundamental rights in EEA law or: How far from Bosphorus is the European Economic Area Agreement? In S. Breitenmoser, B. Ehrenzeller, M. Sassòli, et al. (Eds.), Human rights, democracy and the rule of law: Liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (pp. 59–89). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  5. Hillion, C. (2010). Mixed agreements revisited – The EU and its member states in the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Diaconu, M., & Veuthey, A. (2012). Poker – Game of chance, mind game or sport? Causa Sport, (1), 32–36.Google Scholar
  7. Oesch, M. (2011). Der Schutz kommerzieller Kommunikation im EU-Recht. In A. Heinemann, R. M. Hilty, P. Nobel, et al. (Eds.), Kommunikation: Festschrift für Rolf H. Weber zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 605–620). Bern: Stämplfi Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Lenaerts, K. (2012). Die EU-Grundrechtecharta: Anwendbarkeit und Auslegung. Europarecht, 47(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
  9. Huber, P. M. (2008). The unitary effect of the community’s fundamental rights: The ERT-doctrine needs to be reviewed. European Public Law, 14(3), 323–333.Google Scholar
  10. Eeckhout, P. (2002). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the federal question. Common Market Law Review, 39(5), 945–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frenz, W. (2011). “Annäherung von europäischen Grundrechten und Grundfreiheiten”. Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, 30(16), 961–964.Google Scholar
  12. Drews, C. (2005). Die Wesensgehaltsgarantie des Art. 19 II GG. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  13. Kober, M. (2009). Der Grundrechtsschutz in der Europäischen Union: Bestandsaufnahme, Konkretisierung und Ansätze zur Weiterentwicklung der europäischen Grundrechtsdogmatik anhand der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union (Europäisches und internationales Recht, Vol. 71). Nolte, G., & Streinz, R. (Eds.). Munich: Herbert Utz Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Rosas, A., & Kaila, H. (2011). L’application de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne par la Cour de justice – Un premier bilan. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea, 16(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  15. Lenaerts, K., & Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. (2010). The constitutional allocation of powers and general principles of EU law. Common Market Law Review, 47(6), 1629–1669.Google Scholar
  16. Egger, A. (2006). EU fundamental rights in the national legal order: The obligations of member states revisited. Yearbook of European Law, 25(1), 515–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tridimas, T. (2006). The general principles of EU law (2nd ed.). Oxford/Portland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Brosius-Gersdorf, F. (2005). Bindung der Mitgliedstaaten an die Gemeinschaftsgrundrechte: Die Grundrechtsbindung der Mitgliedstaaten nach der Rechtsprechung des EuGH, der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union und ihre Fortentwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Planzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Lecturer in LawUniversity of St.Gallen HSGSt.GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations