Skip to main content

Learning in or with games?

Quality Criteria for Digital Learning Games from the Perspectives of Learning, Emotion, and Motivation Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning

Abstract

This conceptual chapter aims to clarify the theoretical underpinnings of game-based learning (GBL) and learning with digital learning games (DLGs). To do so, it analyzes learning of game-related skills and contents, which occurs constantly during playing conventional entertainment games, from three perspectives: learning theory, emotion theory, and motivation theory. It is assumed that by an analysis of the processes leading to implicit learning in conventional digital games, the underlying principles can be made explicit and subsequently used for designing DLGs effective for curricular learning. Theoretical approaches which are used in the analysis include behaviorism, cognitivism, and individual and social constructivism for the perspective of learning theory. For the perspective of emotion theory, research on learning-related effects of positive and negative emotion is used, and for the perspective of motivation theory constructs and approaches such as self-efficacy, locus of control, interest, and self-determination theory are drawn upon. All of these theoretical perspectives help to understand how players of conventional entertainment games acquire a wide range of skills and contents while playing, and why they do so with immense motivational and emotional involvement. The results of the theoretical analysis are subsequently used to deduct criteria and guidelines for designing and applying DLGs as powerful learning environments. Early experiences derived from the checklist’s application are reported and, in an outlook, related to the agenda of open access to formal and informal learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astleitner, H. (2000). Designing emotionally sound instruction. The FEASP-approach. Instructional Science, 28, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C. P., Anderson, C. A., & Swing, E. L. (2009). Video game effects-confirmed, suspected, and speculative: A review of the evidence. Simulation & Gaming, 40(3), 377–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. M. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. Vol. II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269–292). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (1999). Toward the construction of fun computer games: Differences in the views of developers and players. Personal Technologies, 3(3), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, J. (2004). Video game studies and the emerging instructional revolution. Innovate, 1(1). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article & id=2. Accessed 12 May 2009.

  • Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning. A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning. Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hense, J., & Mandl, H. (2009). Bildung im Zeitalter digitaler Medien—Zur wechselseitigen Verflechtung von Bildung und Technologien (Education in the age of digital media. On the reciprocal interrelation of education and technology). In M. Henninger & H. Mandl (Eds.), Handbuch Medien- und Bildungsmanagement (Handbook of media and education management) (pp. 21–40). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., Hedlund, T., et al. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, C., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., & Chan, G. (2011). Practical, appropriate, empirically-validated guidelines for designing educational games. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’11. New York, NY, USA, pp. 1979–1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantz, R. (2007). Open source, open content und open access. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede (Open source, open content and open access, commonalities and differences). In B. Lutterbeck, M. Bärwolff, & R. Gehring (Eds.), Open Source Jahrbuch 2007. Zwischen freier Software und Gesellschaftsmodell (Open Source Yearbook 2007. Between free software and society model) (pp. 413–426). Berlin: Lehmanns Media. (http://www.opensourcejahrbuch.de/download/jb2007/ osjb2007-06-03-mantz.pdf).

  • McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2013). The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: The effect of open access on cites to science journals across the quality spectrum. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2269040, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2269040. Accessed 24 Feb. 2014.

  • Moreno-Ger, P., Burgos, D., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Sierra, J. L., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2008). Educational game design for online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2530–2540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement. Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Zahedani, S., & Ziemer, A. (Eds.). (2008). Spielend die Zukunft gewinnen. Wachstumsmarkt Elektronische Spiele [Playfully winning the future. The growing market of electronic games]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul: Paragon House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2011). Comments on research comparing games to other instructional methods. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 251–278). Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral & the bazaar. Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Cambridge: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (Ed.). (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (1999). Motivation und Emotion im Lernprozess. Aktuelle Befunde und Forschungsperspektiven (Motivation and emotion in learning processes. Current research results and perspectives). In M. Jerusalem & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion, Motivation und Leistung (Emotion, motivation and performance) (pp. 189–204). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. E., & Wiley, D. (Eds.). (2007). The educational design and use of simulation computer games. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (Eds.). (2011). Computer games and instruction. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne, D. (2008). Sieben Arten der Lernmotivation. Ein Überblick über zentrale Forschungskonzepte (Seven kinds of learning motivation. A review of current research perpectives). Psychologische Rundschau, 59, 150–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Hense PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hense, J., Mandl, H. (2014). Learning in or with games?. In: Sampson, D., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J., Isaias, P. (eds) Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02264-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics