Abstract
This conceptual chapter aims to clarify the theoretical underpinnings of game-based learning (GBL) and learning with digital learning games (DLGs). To do so, it analyzes learning of game-related skills and contents, which occurs constantly during playing conventional entertainment games, from three perspectives: learning theory, emotion theory, and motivation theory. It is assumed that by an analysis of the processes leading to implicit learning in conventional digital games, the underlying principles can be made explicit and subsequently used for designing DLGs effective for curricular learning. Theoretical approaches which are used in the analysis include behaviorism, cognitivism, and individual and social constructivism for the perspective of learning theory. For the perspective of emotion theory, research on learning-related effects of positive and negative emotion is used, and for the perspective of motivation theory constructs and approaches such as self-efficacy, locus of control, interest, and self-determination theory are drawn upon. All of these theoretical perspectives help to understand how players of conventional entertainment games acquire a wide range of skills and contents while playing, and why they do so with immense motivational and emotional involvement. The results of the theoretical analysis are subsequently used to deduct criteria and guidelines for designing and applying DLGs as powerful learning environments. Early experiences derived from the checklist’s application are reported and, in an outlook, related to the agenda of open access to formal and informal learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.
Astleitner, H. (2000). Designing emotionally sound instruction. The FEASP-approach. Instructional Science, 28, 169–198.
Barlett, C. P., Anderson, C. A., & Swing, E. L. (2009). Video game effects-confirmed, suspected, and speculative: A review of the evidence. Simulation & Gaming, 40(3), 377–403.
Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. M. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. Vol. II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269–292). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Choi, D., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (1999). Toward the construction of fun computer games: Differences in the views of developers and players. Personal Technologies, 3(3), 92–104.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Foreman, J. (2004). Video game studies and the emerging instructional revolution. Innovate, 1(1). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article & id=2. Accessed 12 May 2009.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning. A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441–467.
Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning. Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39–47.
Hense, J., & Mandl, H. (2009). Bildung im Zeitalter digitaler Medien—Zur wechselseitigen Verflechtung von Bildung und Technologien (Education in the age of digital media. On the reciprocal interrelation of education and technology). In M. Henninger & H. Mandl (Eds.), Handbuch Medien- und Bildungsmanagement (Handbook of media and education management) (pp. 21–40). Weinheim: Beltz.
Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., Hedlund, T., et al. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961.
Linehan, C., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., & Chan, G. (2011). Practical, appropriate, empirically-validated guidelines for designing educational games. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’11. New York, NY, USA, pp. 1979–1988.
Mantz, R. (2007). Open source, open content und open access. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede (Open source, open content and open access, commonalities and differences). In B. Lutterbeck, M. Bärwolff, & R. Gehring (Eds.), Open Source Jahrbuch 2007. Zwischen freier Software und Gesellschaftsmodell (Open Source Yearbook 2007. Between free software and society model) (pp. 413–426). Berlin: Lehmanns Media. (http://www.opensourcejahrbuch.de/download/jb2007/ osjb2007-06-03-mantz.pdf).
McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2013). The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: The effect of open access on cites to science journals across the quality spectrum. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2269040, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2269040. Accessed 24 Feb. 2014.
Moreno-Ger, P., Burgos, D., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Sierra, J. L., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2008). Educational game design for online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2530–2540.
O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 455–474.
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement. Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 359–376.
Picot, A., Zahedani, S., & Ziemer, A. (Eds.). (2008). Spielend die Zukunft gewinnen. Wachstumsmarkt Elektronische Spiele [Playfully winning the future. The growing market of electronic games]. Berlin: Springer.
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul: Paragon House Publishers.
Prensky, M. (2011). Comments on research comparing games to other instructional methods. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 251–278). Albany: State University of New York.
Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral & the bazaar. Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Cambridge: O’Reilly.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Resnick, L. B. (Ed.). (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Rheinberg, F. (1999). Motivation und Emotion im Lernprozess. Aktuelle Befunde und Forschungsperspektiven (Motivation and emotion in learning processes. Current research results and perspectives). In M. Jerusalem & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion, Motivation und Leistung (Emotion, motivation and performance) (pp. 189–204). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Shelton, B. E., & Wiley, D. (Eds.). (2007). The educational design and use of simulation computer games. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (Eds.). (2011). Computer games and instruction. Albany: State University of New York.
Urhahne, D. (2008). Sieben Arten der Lernmotivation. Ein Überblick über zentrale Forschungskonzepte (Seven kinds of learning motivation. A review of current research perpectives). Psychologische Rundschau, 59, 150–166.
Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology. Boston: Pearson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hense, J., Mandl, H. (2014). Learning in or with games?. In: Sampson, D., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J., Isaias, P. (eds) Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02264-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02264-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02263-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02264-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)