Skip to main content

Developing Technological and Pedagogical Affordances to Support the Collaborative Process of Inquiry-Based Science Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning

Abstract

Collaborative shared inquiry and problem solving mediated by electronic networks are now fundamental to every scientific community. We report on the development and evaluation of an information and communications technology (ICT) tool to support learning how to learn together (L2L2) in science education as part of a European Commission (EC)-funded project called “Metafora” (FP7-ICT-2009.4.2/257872). Through literature review, we isolated some key features of L2L2 and inquiry science processes. We turned these into icons within an ICT environment to support planning and reflection of inquiries stimulated by real-world challenges. In this chapter, we report the design-based research study carried out in secondary schools in Spain in order to gain an understanding about the Metafora’s technological and pedagogical affordances to support students’ awareness of the key aspects of learning together and the key scientific inquiry processes. Our findings suggest that the ICT environment may help raise students’ awareness of key collaborative scientific processes. These findings may contribute to the development of tools to support more web-mediated collaborative learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Metafora”—Learning to learn together: A visual language for social orchestration of educational activities. FP7-ICT-2009.4.2 Technology Enhanced Learning, contract no. 257872.

References

  • Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., & Crook, C. (2009). Personal enquiry: Linking the cultures of home and school with technology mediated science enquiry. In N. Pachler & J. Seipold (Eds.), Mobile learning cultures across education, work and leisure. Proceedings of the 3rd WLE mobile learning symposium, London, 27th March 2009. London: WLE Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 2292–2370). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. J. (1989). The knowledge level reconsidered: Modeling how systems interact. ­Machine Learning, 4(3/4), 2852–2892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G., Hausman, C. S., & Scribner, J. P. (2002). Reshaping the principalship. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge (pp. 1892–1910). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research (pp. 1071–1128).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M. F. (2006). Networked learning. Apeldoorn: Politie Academie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of enquiry. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. (2007). Role of enquiry in school science. Science and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-enquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 1992–2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning communities in the classroom. International Handbook of ­Psychology in Education, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M., & Wiriyapinit, M. (2004). Carrying out research into learning through online discussion: Opportunities and difficulties. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, C. Jones, V. Lally, D. ­McConnel, & C. Steeples (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on ­networked learning 2004 (pp. 4564–4662). Lancaster: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. F., & Adams, S. (2011). Challenge-based learning: The report from the ­implementation project. Austin: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C, Robinson, T, & Clemson, B. (1996). Reflective enquiry: A method for organizatinal learning. The Learning Organization, 3(4), 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kynigos C. (2007). Half-baked logo microworlds as boundary objects in integrated design. ­Informatics in Education, 6(2), 3353–3358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyza, E. A., & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Reflective enquiry: What it is and how can software ­scaffolds help. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research ­Association. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Dong, T., Archodidou, A., Kim, I., et al. (2007). Emergent leadership in children’s discussion groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 751–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Loll, N. Pinkwart, O. Scheuer, B. M. McLaren (2009). Towards a Flexible Intelligent Tutoring System for Argumentation. In I. Adeo, N. Chen, Kinshuk, D. Sampson, L. Zaitseva, eds., Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 647–648). Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of childrenʼs thinking: A ­sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Greeno, J. (1987). Mental models in expert physics problem solving, ONR report GK-2, available from school of education. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharwtz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexibility adaptive instructional design. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 1832–1914). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimoda, T. A., White, B. Y., & Frederiksen J. R. (2002). Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education, 86(2), 2442–2463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge (acting with technology) (Illustrated edition). The MIT Press Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steed, A., Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Tromp, J., & Bullock, A. (1999). Leadership and collaboration in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on virtual reality (Houston, TX, March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., & Oldfather, P. (1995). Enhancing student and teacher engagement in literacy learning: A shared enquiry approach. The Reading Teacher, 49(3), 1922–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 779–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Education, Technology, Research and Development (ETR & D), 53(4), 10421–10629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Wegerif, R., Dragon, T., Mavrikis, M., & McLaren, B. (2013). Learning how to learn together (L2L2): Developing tools to support an essential complex competence for the Internet age. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of ­computer-supported collaborative learning conference. Madison. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by EU-R&D project “Metafora—Learning to Learn Together: A visual language for social orchestration of educational activities” (EC/FP7, Grant agreement: 257872) and partially funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia y tecnología of the Spanish government (project number: EDU2012-32415).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoli Pifarré .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pifarré, M., Wegerif, R., Guiral, A., del Barrio, M. (2014). Developing Technological and Pedagogical Affordances to Support the Collaborative Process of Inquiry-Based Science Education. In: Sampson, D., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J., Isaias, P. (eds) Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02264-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics