The I-AGENT Project: Blended Learning Proposal for Professional English Integrating an AI Extended Version of Moodle with Classroom Work for the Practice of Oral Skills

  • Elena Martín-MonjeEmail author
  • Noa Talaván
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 19)


I-AGENT is an online Business English environment developed by the ATLAS research group. Its main innovative feature is the use it makes of blended learning methodology and how it integrates and enhances the practice of oral skills, through an original combination of online and face-to-face sessions. It is common to have the online course as support for the face-to-face classes, but I-AGENT proposes the reverse sequencing: the main content of the course is practised online (via an extended version of Moodle that uses an intelligent agent to adapt course content to student progress) and the face-to-face class is used to reinforce and practise oral comprehension, production and interaction. Besides, the introduction of scaffolded online activities enables the student to be supported in the learning process, ensuring the consolidation of language learning. This way, I-AGENT gets to balance and integrate traditional and modern methodologies at the same time it focuses on oral skills, so often unattended in Computer Assisted Language Learning.


Language Learning Listen Comprehension Language Teaching Learn Management System Blended Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bárcena, E., and T. Read. 2003. Los sistemas de enseñanza de inglés para fines específicos basados en el aprendiente. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia 6(2): 41–54.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, B., and P. Sharma. 2007. Blended learning. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bax, S. 2003. CALL – Past, present and future. System 31: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bax, S. 2011. Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT) 1(2): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bent, M. 2001. MLE or VLE – Is that the question? Accessed 22 Feb 2013.
  6. Brandl, K. 2005. Are you ready to “Moodle”? Language Learning & Technology 9(2): 16–23. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  7. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA). 2004. What the research says about Virtual Learning Environments in teaching and learning. Accessed 25 Feb 2011.
  8. Brown, G. 1995. Speakers, listeners and communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, H. 2007. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  10. Buck, G. 2001. Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campos, V. 2007. Moodle-Quaderns digitals, una herramienta colaborativa. Bits 7. view&id=130&Itemid=100. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  12. Candlin, C., and N. Mercer. 2001. English language teaching in its social context: A reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, R., and D. Nunan (eds.). 2007. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, A., and S. Bax. 2006. Making CALL work: Towards normalisation. System 34: 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapelle, C. 2001. Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapelle, C. 2007. Towards adaptive CALL. Accessed 27 Feb 2013.
  17. Claypole, M. 2010. Controversies in ELT. Norderstedt: LinguaBooks.Google Scholar
  18. Cobo, C., and H. Pardo. 2007. Planeta Web 2.0. (Electronic book). Accessed 22 Feb 2013.
  19. Cole, J. 2005. Using Moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Community Press.Google Scholar
  20. Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dalziel, J. 2003. Implementing learning design: The learning activity management system. In Interact, integrate, impact: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), ed. G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, et al., 593–596. Adelaide: ASCILITE.Google Scholar
  22. De Bot, K., W. Lowie, and M. Verspoor. 2005. Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. De la Torre, A. 2005. CMS y LMS. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  24. Dougiamas, M. 1998. A journey into constructivism. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.
  25. Dougiamas, M. 2002. Interpretive analysis of an Internet-based course constructed using a new courseware tool called Moodle. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  26. Felix, U. 2008. The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL 20(2): 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folse, K. 2006. The art of teaching speaking. Research and pedagogy for the ESL/EFL classroom. Michigan: University of Michigan Press/ESL.Google Scholar
  28. Gagné, R.M. 1985. The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  29. Gisbert, M., J. Adell, L. Anaya, and R. Rallo. 2007. Entornos de formación presencial virtual y a distancia. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  30. Godwin-Jones, R. 2012. Emerging technologies. Challenging hegemonies in online learning. Language Learning & Technology 16(2): 4–13.Google Scholar
  31. Hubbard, P. (ed.). 2009. Computer-assisted language learning, vols. I–IV. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, R. 2002. Teaching and researching speaking. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  33. Kim, B. 2001. Social constructivism. In Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, ed. M. Orey. Accessed 13 May 2013.
  34. Kirschner, P. 2001. Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Research dialogue in learning and instruction 2(1): 1–9. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
  35. Kumaravadivelu, B. 2005. Understanding language teaching: From method to post-method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lara, P., and J.M. Duart. 2005. Gestión de contenidos en el e-learning: acceso y uso de objetos de información como recurso estratégico. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC) 2(2). Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  37. Levy, M. 1997. Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Levy, M., and G. Stockwell. 2006. CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. López Meneses, E. 2008. Análisis de los modelos didácticos y estrategias de enseñanza en Teleformación: Diseño y experimentación de un instrumento de evaluación de las estrategias de enseñanza de cursos telemáticos de formación universitaria. PhD dissertation, Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
  40. Luoma, S. 2004. Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martín-Monje, E. 2010. Preparación de la PAU de inglés como lengua extranjera con el apoyo del aula virtual de Moodle. Dissertation, Univeridad nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED).Google Scholar
  42. Molist, M. 2008. Moodle llena la geografía española de campus virtuales. El País. Accessed 25 Feb 2011. December 4.
  43. Mougalian, C., and A. Salazar. 2005. Moodle, the electronic syllabus, lends itself to PrOCALL.]. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  44. Nation, I.S.P., and J. Newton. 2008. Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Neisser, U. 1967. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  46. Neumeier, P. 2005. A closer look at blended learning – parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL 17(2): 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nunan, D. 2000. Language teaching methodology. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  48. Pancorbo, J., T. Read, E. Bárcena, and R. Varela. 2005. Diagnosis de los estados de conocimiento en un sistema tutor inteligente. Revista Iberoamericana de Sistemas, Cibernética e Informática 2(2).$/risci/pdfs/P479745.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
  49. Papert, S. 1991. Situating constructionism. In Constructionism: Research reports and essays,1985–1990, ed. I. Harel and P. Seymour, 1–11. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  50. Peterson, E., and B. Coltrane. 2003. Culture in second language teaching. CAL Digest, EDO-FL-03-09. Accessed 21 Sept 2007.
  51. Piaget, J. 1980. The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In Language and learning, ed. M. Piattelli-Palmarini, 377–384. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Prefume, Y. 2007. Constructivism in foreign language learning. The Free Library. Accessed 12 May 2013.
  53. Read, T., N. Talaván, L. Pomposo, and J. Arús. 2011. Have computers ever assisted language learning? Problems and prospects. In Technological innovation in the teaching and processing of LSPs: Proceedings of TISLID’10, ed. N. Talaván, E. Martín-Monje, and F. Palazón, 132–139. Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
  54. Rice, W. 2006. Moodle. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Richards, J.C. 2001. Beyond methods. In English language teaching in its social context, ed. C.N. Candlin and N. Mercer. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Richards, J.C., and T.S. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Richards, J.C., J. Platt, and H. Platt. 1992. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  58. Robb, T. 2004. Building your own course management system. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  59. Rosen, E., and R. Varela. 2009. Claves para comprender el Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas. Madrid: Enclave-ELE/CLE International.Google Scholar
  60. Rost, M. 2002. Teaching and researching listening. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  61. Scagnoli, N. 2001. El aula virtual: Usos y elementos que la componen. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  62. Sharma, P. 2010. Blended learning. ELT Journal 64(4): 456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharwood, M. 1994. Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  64. Skinner, B.F. 1957. Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steinberg, D.D. 2001. Psycholinguistics: Language, mind, and world. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  66. Stern, H. 1997. Fundamental concepts of language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Suharno, S. 2010. Cognitivism and its implication in the second language learning. Parole 1: 48–63. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
  68. Tsang, P., R. Kwan, and R. Fox. 2007. Enhancing learning through technology. London: World Scientific Co.Google Scholar
  69. Zapata, M. 2008. Un cuarto de siglo de ayuda pedagógica en ordenadores y en redes. Quaderns Digitals 51: 13–32. Accessed 25 Feb 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Filologías Extranjeras y sus LingüísticasUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations