Reflections on the Future of Technology-Mediated LSP Research and Education

  • Jorge ArúsEmail author
  • Elena Bárcena
  • Timothy Read
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 19)


In the introduction to this volume, we promised to present a state-of-the-art of technological and methodological innovation in the teaching and processing of specialized linguistic domains. It is our belief that the chapters included in this compilation have not only offered valuable insights into the promised state-of-the-art but also opened a number of approaches that will help to shape the future of CALL and LSP research, teaching and learning.


Methodological Innovation Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) Open Educational Resources Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Large Student Numbers 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arnó, E. 2012. The role of technology in teaching languages for specific purposes courses. The Modern Language Journal 96: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrigo, M., A. Kukulska-Hulme, I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, and G. Kismihok. 2013. Meta-analyses from a collaborative project in mobile lifelong learning. British Educational Research Journal 39(2): 222–247.Google Scholar
  3. Arús-Hita, J., P. Rodríguez-Arancón, and C. Calle-Martínez. 2013. A pedagogic assessment of mobile learning applications. In Proceedings of ICDE 2013, Mobilizing Distance Education, UNED, Madrid.Google Scholar
  4. Barcena, E., E. Martín Monje, and T. Read. 2013. Mobile learning and social networks: A socially sensitive proposal for the development of oral professional English capabilities. In Proceedings of ICDE 2013, Mobilizing Distance Education, UNED, Madrid.Google Scholar
  5. Beetham, H., and R. Sharpe (eds.). 2013. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, S., A. Bishop, B. Dalgarno, J. Waycott, and G. Kennedy. 2012. Implementing Web 2.0 Technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers and Education 59(2): 524–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake, R.J. 2013. Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deterding, S., D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international Academic MindTrek conference, 9–15.Google Scholar
  9. Díaz Vera, J.E. 2012. Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile assisted language learning. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  10. Effective Web 2.0 Tools for the Classroom.
  11. Facer, B.R., and M. Abdous. 2011. Academic podcasting and mobile assisted language learning: Applications and outcomes. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, S. 2012. As it happens: The added value of synchronous web 2.0 communication tools in second language and culture courses. In Proceedings of INTED2012, 4465–4472.Google Scholar
  13. Garrett, N. 2009. Computer assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal 93(s1): 719–740.Google Scholar
  14. Geser, G. 2012. Open educational practices and resources: The OLCOS roadmap 2012. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento 4(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Hilton III, J., D. Wiley, J. Stein, and A. Johnson. 2010. The four ‘R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning 25(1): 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huotari, K., and J. Hamari.2012. Defining gamification – A service marketing perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th international Academic MindTrek conference 2012, 17–22.Google Scholar
  17. Kukulska-Hulme, A. 2012. Language learning defined by time and place: A framework for next generation designs. InLeft to My Own Devices: Learner Autonomy and Mobile Assisted Language Learning. Innovation and Leadership in English Language Teaching, 6, ed. J.E. Díaz-Vera, 1–13. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, T.Y., T.H. Tan, and Y.L. Chu. 2010. QR code and augmented reality-supported mobile English learning system. In Mobile multimedia processing, 37–52. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McAuley, A., B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier. 2010. The MOOC model for digital practice.
  20. Papadima-Sophocleous, S., and C. Yerou. 2013. Using wikis in an English for specific academic purposes (ESAP) context: University students’ perceptions and reflections. Teaching English with Technology 13(2): 23–54.Google Scholar
  21. Pilgrim, J., and C. Bledsoe. 2013. The application of Web 2.0 Tools for literacy education. In Technological tools for the literacy classroom, ed. J. Whittingham, S. Huffman, W. Rickman, and C. Wiedmaier, 27–44. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  22. Read, T., and E. Bárcena. 2013. MOOCs and open higher education: The case of UNED. In Proceedings of Ikasnabar 2013, the 6th International conference on open education and technology, ed. G. Palazio. Leioa: Publishing Service of the University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
  23. Reinders, Hayo. 2012. Digital games in language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sadaf, A., T. Newby, and P.A. Ertmer. 2013. Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 45(2): 171–196.Google Scholar
  25. Saurabh, S., and A.S. Sairam. 2013. Professors – The new YouTube stars: Education through web 2.0 and social network. International Journal of Web Based Communities 9(2): 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Specht, M., S. Ternier, and W. Greller. 2011. Mobile augmented reality for learning: A case study. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 7(1): 117–127.Google Scholar
  27. Sykes, J.M., J.E. Liskin-Gasparro, and M.E. Lacorte. 2012. Language at play: Digital games in second and foreign language teaching and learning. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, S., and C. Vasquez. 2012. Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal 29(3): 412–430.Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, F. 2012. Computer-enhanced and mobile-assisted language learning. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  30. Zichermann, G., and C. Cunningham. 2011. Introduction. In Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media. xiv.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Filología Inglesa IUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Filologías Extranjeras y sus LingüísticasUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaMadridSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas InformáticosUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations