Abstract
Flexicurity is used as a strategy in the Netherlands in order to increase flexibility for the permanent workers and improve the position of the flexible workers. The concept was introduced in the 1990s by the government in a paper and was further elaborated in an agreement of both sides of industry. This involved that the position of temporary agency workers was regulated and improved, and it was made easier to provide contracts for a definite period. This agreement was laid down in an act, thus amending the existing labour code. Important was that the position of the trade unions was reinforced since the Act allowed deviation from the general rules only by a collective labour agreement.
In 2013, again the social partners were asked to negotiate on the flexibilisation of dismissal law and improving the position of flexible workers. This led to an agreement of the social partners and was subsequently laid down in the labour code.
This procedure is relatively successful but leaves some dilemmas untouched, such as it is easier for employers to make use of the flexibilisation of the position of permanent workers than for flexible workers to make use of the rules that are meant as an improvement. Most of them can be escaped, e.g., by employing the workers shorter than the threshold for improving their position. This may sometimes even mean that flexible workers are worse off since they lose their work sooner than they did under the old rules.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Kamerstukken ii (Parliamentary Papers) 1995–1996, 24,543.
- 2.
Flexibiliteit en Zekerheid, The Hague 1996.
- 3.
Act of 14 May 1988, Stb. (Official Journal) 300.
- 4.
Act of 4 June 1996, Stb. (Official Journal) 306.
- 5.
Case C-413/13, FNV Kiem, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2411.
- 6.
http://www.bna.nl/bna-in-de-media-primeur-cao-zzp-architecten/ last visited on 11 July 2016.
References
Pennings F (2015) Exceptie van de mededingingsbepalingen voor (schijn)zelfstandigen: de zaak FNV Kiem. Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, 2015(4)
van Velzen M, Wilthagen T (2006) In search of a balance: flexibility and security strategies in employment protection legislation, temporary work and part-time work. In: Pennings F, Süral N (eds) Flexibilisation and modernisation of the Turkish Labour market. Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 153–182
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pennings, F. (2018). Dilemmas in Organising the Labour Market, Experiences with Flexicurity in the Netherlands. In: Sander, G., Tomljenović, V., Bodiroga-Vukobrat, N. (eds) Transnational, European, and National Labour Relations. Europeanization and Globalization, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02219-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02219-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02218-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02219-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)