Skip to main content

Enablers and Inhibitors of Learning Transfer from Theory to Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transfer of Learning in Organizations

Abstract

The present chapter aims at investigating the role of learning transfer in training effectiveness. More precisely, the purpose is to determine the factors that enable and/or inhibit learning transfer. The focus on enablers and inhibitors stems from the concept itself which implies whether learning acquired is applied or otherwise fails to be applied.

On the theoretical level, the analysis focuses on the underlying assumptions governing the phenomenon and yields to the development of a learning transfer cycle. On the empirical level, learning transfer is a worldwide issue particularly in emerging economies. Research in the Tunisian context shows a widening gap between theory and real practices contributing to some deficiencies in learning transfer. The results of a survey and a case study provide evidence that even though there is an apparent policy for learning transfer, organizational practices reveal an informal dynamic in transmitting and sharing learning. Implications for managers and employees in postrevolutionary firms are delivered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The same conclusion was inferred in a previous study on the same company pertaining to the role of management by objectives and the success of total quality management.

References

  • Agency of industrial promotion API. (2013). www.tunisieindustrie.nat.tn. Accessed May 2013.

  • Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2006). Stratégie de sous-traitance et performance de l’entreprise: Essai de rationalisation. Paper presented at the international symposium on Financement des entreprises et stratégie de développement dans les PME, Sousse, Tunisia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2007). Le management par la qualité et performance des organisations publiques: Spécificités, enjeux et effet de mode. Paper presented at the international symposium on Modèles et pratiques de management entre convergence et contingence, Fès–Morocco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2010). Le management de la qualité: Affaire d’acteurs (cas de la CPG). Paper presented at the 6èmes Journées d’Ingénierie Industrielle (J2I’10) & Les 5èmes Journées de Rencontre Interdisciplinaire sur le Management de la Qualité (RIMAQ’10), Sfax, Tunisia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2012). Vers l’intégration de la gestion par objectifs et du management de la qualité totale: Etude de cas d’un organisme public. Revue Tunisienne d’Administration Publique (SERVIR), (39–40), 23–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citeau, J. P. (2002). Gestion des ressources humaines: Principes généraux et cas pratiques. Paris: Editions Dalloz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunberry, A., & Péchard, C. (2007). L’évaluation de la formation dans l’entreprise. Etat de la question et perspectives (Rapport UQAM/CIRDEP). Retrieved from www.cpmt.gouv.qc.ca.

  • Galbraith, J. (1995). Designing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gérard, F. M. (2003). L’évaluation de l’efficacité d’une formation. Gestion 2000, 20(3), 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. A. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heraty, N., & Morley, M. J. (2003). Management development in Ireland: The new organizational wealth? The Journal of Management Development, 22(1), 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, E. F. (2005). Holton’s evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, E. F. (1996). The flawed four level evaluation model. Human Resources, Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, C. R. (2003). Designing learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 32(1), 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training. Human Factors, 37(4), 804–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of ASTD, 11, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training and Development Journal, 33(6), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1983). La structure des révolutions scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimbach, M., & Maringka, J. (2009). Learning transfer model: A research driven approach to enhancing learning effectiveness (Research Report). Retrieved from www.wilsonlearning.com.

  • Le Louarn, J. Y., & Wils, T. (2001). L’évaluation de la gestion des ressources humaines. Paris: Editions Liaisons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. H., & Wu, C. C. (2009). The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louati, H., Boudabbous, S., & Bouzguenda, K. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of E-learning: A case study of two companies in Tunisia. Paper presented at the International Conference on E-Learning, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Leahy, B. (2005). Learning transfer: A review of the research in adult education and training. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 14, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of employment and continued education. (2013). www.edunet.tn. Accessed May 2013.

  • Ministry of higher education. (2013). www.mes.tn. Accessed May 2013.

  • Nadler, D., Gerstein, M., & Shaw, R, and associates. (1992). Organizational architecture: designs for changing organizations. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada-Pallares, C. (2012). Training transfer evaluation in the publication administration of Catalonia: The MEVIT factors model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1751–1755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M. (1978). Theories of learning transfer (Tech. Rep. No 79). Illinois: University of Illinois, Center of the study of reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savall, H., & Zardet, V. (1995). Maîtriser les coûts et les performances cachés: Le contrat d’activité périodiquement négociable. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.R. (1999). Transfer of learning: Paradoxes for learners-Learning, memory and cognition. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 577–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). Transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. (1998). Delivering results: A new mandate for human resource professionals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (1991). Developing and training human resources in organizations. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karima Bouzguenda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouzguenda, K. (2014). Enablers and Inhibitors of Learning Transfer from Theory to Practice. In: Schneider, K. (eds) Transfer of Learning in Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02093-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics