Abstract
The present chapter aims at investigating the role of learning transfer in training effectiveness. More precisely, the purpose is to determine the factors that enable and/or inhibit learning transfer. The focus on enablers and inhibitors stems from the concept itself which implies whether learning acquired is applied or otherwise fails to be applied.
On the theoretical level, the analysis focuses on the underlying assumptions governing the phenomenon and yields to the development of a learning transfer cycle. On the empirical level, learning transfer is a worldwide issue particularly in emerging economies. Research in the Tunisian context shows a widening gap between theory and real practices contributing to some deficiencies in learning transfer. The results of a survey and a case study provide evidence that even though there is an apparent policy for learning transfer, organizational practices reveal an informal dynamic in transmitting and sharing learning. Implications for managers and employees in postrevolutionary firms are delivered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The same conclusion was inferred in a previous study on the same company pertaining to the role of management by objectives and the success of total quality management.
References
Agency of industrial promotion API. (2013). www.tunisieindustrie.nat.tn. Accessed May 2013.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105.
Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2006). Stratégie de sous-traitance et performance de l’entreprise: Essai de rationalisation. Paper presented at the international symposium on Financement des entreprises et stratégie de développement dans les PME, Sousse, Tunisia.
Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2007). Le management par la qualité et performance des organisations publiques: Spécificités, enjeux et effet de mode. Paper presented at the international symposium on Modèles et pratiques de management entre convergence et contingence, Fès–Morocco.
Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2010). Le management de la qualité: Affaire d’acteurs (cas de la CPG). Paper presented at the 6èmes Journées d’Ingénierie Industrielle (J2I’10) & Les 5èmes Journées de Rencontre Interdisciplinaire sur le Management de la Qualité (RIMAQ’10), Sfax, Tunisia.
Bouzguenda, K., & Chalghaf, A. (2012). Vers l’intégration de la gestion par objectifs et du management de la qualité totale: Etude de cas d’un organisme public. Revue Tunisienne d’Administration Publique (SERVIR), (39–40), 23–61.
Citeau, J. P. (2002). Gestion des ressources humaines: Principes généraux et cas pratiques. Paris: Editions Dalloz.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MA: MIT Press.
Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper and Row.
Dunberry, A., & Péchard, C. (2007). L’évaluation de la formation dans l’entreprise. Etat de la question et perspectives (Rapport UQAM/CIRDEP). Retrieved from www.cpmt.gouv.qc.ca.
Galbraith, J. (1995). Designing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gérard, F. M. (2003). L’évaluation de l’efficacité d’une formation. Gestion 2000, 20(3), 13–33.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. A. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business Books.
Heraty, N., & Morley, M. J. (2003). Management development in Ireland: The new organizational wealth? The Journal of Management Development, 22(1), 60–82.
Holton, E. F. (2005). Holton’s evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 37–54.
Holton, E. F. (1996). The flawed four level evaluation model. Human Resources, Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5–21.
James, C. R. (2003). Designing learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 32(1), 46–61.
Kraiger, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training. Human Factors, 37(4), 804–816.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of ASTD, 11, 1–13.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training and Development Journal, 33(6), 78–92.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. London: Elsevier.
Kuhn, T.S. (1983). La structure des révolutions scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion.
Leimbach, M., & Maringka, J. (2009). Learning transfer model: A research driven approach to enhancing learning effectiveness (Research Report). Retrieved from www.wilsonlearning.com.
Le Louarn, J. Y., & Wils, T. (2001). L’évaluation de la gestion des ressources humaines. Paris: Editions Liaisons.
Liao, S. H., & Wu, C. C. (2009). The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 64–76.
Louati, H., Boudabbous, S., & Bouzguenda, K. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of E-learning: A case study of two companies in Tunisia. Paper presented at the International Conference on E-Learning, Malaysia.
Merriam, S. B., & Leahy, B. (2005). Learning transfer: A review of the research in adult education and training. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 14, 1–24.
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Ministry of employment and continued education. (2013). www.edunet.tn. Accessed May 2013.
Ministry of higher education. (2013). www.mes.tn. Accessed May 2013.
Nadler, D., Gerstein, M., & Shaw, R, and associates. (1992). Organizational architecture: designs for changing organizations. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford NY: Oxford University Press.
Quesada-Pallares, C. (2012). Training transfer evaluation in the publication administration of Catalonia: The MEVIT factors model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1751–1755.
Royer, J. M. (1978). Theories of learning transfer (Tech. Rep. No 79). Illinois: University of Illinois, Center of the study of reading.
Savall, H., & Zardet, V. (1995). Maîtriser les coûts et les performances cachés: Le contrat d’activité périodiquement négociable. Paris: Economica.
Simons, P.R. (1999). Transfer of learning: Paradoxes for learners-Learning, memory and cognition. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 577–589.
Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). Transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 399–441.
Ulrich, D. (1998). Delivering results: A new mandate for human resource professionals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (1991). Developing and training human resources in organizations. New York: Harper Collins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouzguenda, K. (2014). Enablers and Inhibitors of Learning Transfer from Theory to Practice. In: Schneider, K. (eds) Transfer of Learning in Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02093-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02093-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02092-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02093-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)