Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Mathematics ((BRIEFSMATH))

  • 1323 Accesses

Abstract

With the creation of distribution theory, around 1950, a systematic study of properties of linear PDEs with smooth coefficients started. In this context, two basic concepts are those of solvability and hypoellipticity of an operator. Looking for a characterization of linear second order hypoelliptic operators with real coefficients, Hörmander’s proved in 1967 a fundamental result which opened the way to the study of what are now called “Hörmander’s operators”. The chapter describes this circle of ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An interesting account of the early impact of the theory of distributions on the mathematical environment is given by Lars Gårding in [6, Chap. 12].

  2. 2.

    Lewy’s paper appeared on “Annals of Math.”. In its review on the Math. Rev. we read: “Experience with linear partial differential equations has shown that they generally possess smooth local solutions provided the equations are sufficiently smooth. This paper produces the first example of a system with coefficients in \(C^{\infty }\) having no smooth solutions in any domain”.

  3. 3.

    Analogously, one can introduce the notion of Gevray-hypoellipticity, replacing \(C^{\omega }\) with Gevray classes. See [5, pp. 91–92].

  4. 4.

    Think to the fundamental solution of the heat equation, which vanishes identically for \(t<0\) but not for \(t>0\), hence is not analytic.

  5. 5.

    To be more precise, the statement “\(L\) cannot be hypoelliptic” is correct if the operator, after the change of variables, does not possess a zero order term, for in that case any rough function of the variables which are not involved in the derivatives is a solution to the equation. In the general case one can say that if the equation \(Lu=0\) admits a nontrivial solution \(u\), then one can modify \(u\) in a suitable halfspace (normal to one of the direction of the variables not involved in the equation), getting a discontinuous function which is still a distributional solution to the equation \(Lu=0\). Hence \(L\) is not hypoelliptic.

  6. 6.

    We will explain what is the Heisenberg group in Sect. 2.2.4. For the moment, just consider this operator as defined in \(\mathbb {R}^{3}\).

  7. 7.

    In Sect. 2.2.4 we will say more about this.

  8. 8.

    In particular, the first half of that book is devoted to boundary value problems for these elliptic-parabolic degenerate operators, a topic we will not touch here.

  9. 9.

    Besides the original paper by Kohn [10], more detailed and readable expositions of this proof can be found for instance in: [14, Chap. II, Sect. 5], [2, Sect. 8.2] or [15, Appendix] (this last reference only deals the case \(X_{0}=0\)).

References

  1. Beals, R., Fefferman, C.: On local solvability of linear partial differential equations. Ann. Math. 97(2), 482–498 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, S.C., Shaw, M.C.: Partial differential equations in several complex variables. AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; International Press, Boston, MA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christ, M.: Hypoellipticity in the infinitely degenerate regime. In: McNeal J.D. (ed.) Complex Analysis and Geometry (Columbus, OH, 1999), Ohio State University Mathematical Research Institute Publications, vol. 9, pp. 59–84. de Gruyter, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Egorov, Y.V., Shubin, M.A.: Partial Differential Equations. I: Foundations of the Classical Theory of Partial Differential Equations. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 30. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Egorov, Y.V.: Microlocal analysis. In: Egorov, Y.V., Shubin, M.A. (eds.) Partial Differential Equations IV. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 33. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gårding, L.: Some Points of Analysis and Their History. University Lecture Series, vol. 11. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hörmander, L.: Linear Partial Differential Operators. Springer, Berlin (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hörmander, L.: Hypoelliptic second order differential equations. Acta Math. 119, 147–171 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kannai, Y.: An unsolvable hypoelliptic differential operator. Israel J. Math. 9, 306–315 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohn, J.J.: Pseudo-differential operators and hypoellipticity. In: Partial Differential Equations. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. XXIII, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1971, pp. 61–69. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolmogorov, A.N.: Zufällige Bewegungen (zur Theorie der Brownschen Bewegung). Ann. Math. (2) 35(1), 116–117 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krantz, S.G.: Partial Differential Equations and Complex Analysis. Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC press, Boca Raton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewy, H.: An example of a smooth linear partial differential equation without solution. Ann. Math. (2) 66, 155–158 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oleĭnik, O.A., Radkevič, E.V.: Second Order Equations with Nonnegative Characteristic Form. Plenum Press, New York (1973)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci, F.: Sub-Laplacians on Nilpotent Lie Groups. Notes for a course held in 2002/2003 at S.N.S. Pisa. Downloadable at: http://homepage.sns.it/fricci/papers/sublaplaciani.pdf

  16. Schwartz, L.: Théorie des distributions. Tome I. Actualités Sci. Ind., no. 1091 = Publ. Inst. Math. Univ. Strasbourg 9. Hermann & Cie., Paris (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz, L.: Théorie des distributions. Tome II. Actualités Sci. Ind., no. 1122 = Publ. Inst. Math. Univ. Strasbourg 10. Hermann & Cie., Paris (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Treves, F.: Basic Linear Partial Differential Equations. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bramanti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bramanti, M. (2014). Hörmander’s Operators: What they are. In: An Invitation to Hypoelliptic Operators and Hörmander's Vector Fields. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02087-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics