Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 59))

  • 1920 Accesses

Abstract

The terms of art and science referred to the title of this third part reflect the coexistence, integration and harmony of seemingly opposing extremes: the particular and the general, subjectivity and objectivity, the individual and the social context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Online test-version available from: http://inqueritos.fmh.utl.pt/index.php?lang=pt&sid=35883&token=v6cvw4ew3ycqbw2.

References

  • Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33–60). Canada: Athabasca University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C., Kim, K. J., & Zeng, T. (2005). Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2005 (pp. 3644–3649). Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, J. (1996). Statistical techniques. In R. Sapsford & V. Jupp (Eds.), Data collection and analysis (pp. 225–254). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1992). Experimental designs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchateâu, C. (1996). Pourquoi l’école ne peut intégrer les nouvelles technologies. http://www.det.fundp.ac.be/cefis/publications/charles/Pourquoi-5-44.pdf.

  • Franklin, T., & Van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: JISC http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/148/1/web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf.

  • Freire, L. L., Arezes, P. M., & Campos, J. C. (2012). A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms. Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 1038–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. D., & Kinnear, P. R. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 19 made simple. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organization (ISO), (2013). International standards for HCI and usability. Norma ISO/IEC 9126. http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/r_international.html.

  • Lancaster, G., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. (2004). Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz, M. I. P. A., & Moraes, A. (2012). Usability issues in learning management systems (LMS). Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 832–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. New Jersey: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Osguthorpe R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3), 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The impact of web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/Learning-2.0.html.

  • Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B. (1991). Human factors and usability. In J. Preece & L. Keller (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Selected readings (pp. 27–41). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social research update, 35, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia B. Dias .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dias, S.B., Diniz, J.A., Hadjileontiadis, L.J. (2014). On Approaching Usability Issues in an OLE. In: Towards an Intelligent Learning Management System Under Blended Learning. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02078-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02078-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02077-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02078-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics