Skip to main content

Neo-Aristotelian Ethics: Naturalistic or Phenomenological

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 784 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contributions To Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 72))

Abstract

This paper distinguishes four senses of naturalism: (1) reductive physicalism; (2) a naturalism (Foot, Hursthouse) that departs from what Thompson calls “natural-historical judgments”; (3) a naturalism (McDowell) that recognizes that physical nature is located within the space of reasons; and (4) a phenomenological naturalism that shifts the focus to the “natural” experiences of subjects who encounter the world. The paper argues for a “phenomenological neo-Aristotelianism” that accounts both for the internal justification of our first-order moral experience and the need for a broader grounding in a universalistic account of the goods of agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anscombe, E. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 33: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. 1969. The origin of the knowledge of right and wrong. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. 1995. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. 2002a. Does moral subjectivism rest on a mistake? In Moral dilemmas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. 2002b. Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. 2003. Natural goodness. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. 1977. The virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowans, C.W. 2008. Virtue and nature. Social Philosophy and Policy 25(1): 28–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N. 1967. Ethics. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. 1999. On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. 2004. On the grounding of the virtues in human nature. In What is good for a human being? ed. J. Szaif and M. Lutz-Bachmann, 263–275. Berlin: Walter de Gruyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1963. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1970a. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1970b. Logical investigations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1983. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, first book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen: Zweiter Band. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1988. Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre 1908–1914. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 2011. Einleitung in die Ethik: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1920 und 1924. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 1996. The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 2008. The constitution of agency: Essays on practical reason and moral psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 2009. Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. 2002. Two sorts of naturalism. In Virtues and reasons: Philippa foot and moral theory, ed. R. Hursthouse, G. Lawrence, and W. Quinn, 156–157. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1988. Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. In Midwest studies in philosophy 13: Ethical theory: Character and virtue, ed. P.A. French, T.E. Uehling Jr., and H.K. Wettstein, 32–53. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1990. Aristotelian social democracy. In Liberalism and the good, ed. R.B. Douglass, G.M. Mara, and H.S. Richardson, 203–252. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1993. Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. In The quality of life, ed. M. Nussbaum and A. Sen, 242–269. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. 1973. Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. 2008. Life and action: Elementary structures of practice and practical thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hildebrand, D. 1916. Die Idee der sittlichen Handlung. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 3: 126–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hildebrand, D. 1922. Sittlichkeit and ethische Werterkenntnis. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 5: 462–602.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Drummond .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drummond, J.J. (2015). Neo-Aristotelian Ethics: Naturalistic or Phenomenological. In: Bloechl, J., de Warren, N. (eds) Phenomenology in a New Key: Between Analysis and History. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 72. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02018-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics