- 2.1k Downloads
Natural facts are often put forward to support conventional views on sexuality and sex roles. Biological sex differences are often depicted as essentially separate and static. Science often underpins popular understandings of female-male sexual difference, but current research in biology also opens up a space for variable and non-static views of sex and gender. Our goal is to question taken-for-granted assumptions about gender, sex, and biology and thereby deepen our readers’ understanding of biology, sex, and gender by going beyond these popular conceptions. In this introduction I discuss what sex and gender are, how culture influences science, and what implications this influence has for our society.
KeywordsGender Identity Parental Leave Popular Conception Cultural Gender Gender Voice
This book has been made possible by the efforts of many people, notably the contributors themselves, a number of reviewers, and Andrew Lee. The Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University, has also provided support. I wish to thank everyone involved.
- 1.Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- 2.Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender, a critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- 3.McCaughey, M. (2007). The Caveman mystique, pop-Darwinism and the debates over sex, violence and science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 4.Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender, biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
- 5.Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender, the real science behind sex differences. New York: W. W. Northon & Company Inc.Google Scholar
- 6.Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storms: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Cameron, D. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 8.Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body, gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
- 10.Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance, animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Ah-King, M. (2009). Queer nature, towards a non-normative perspective on biological diversity. In J. Bromseth, L. Folkmarson Käll, & K. Mattsson (Eds.), Body claims. Uppsala: Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University.Google Scholar