Skip to main content

The Role of Stability in Cultural Evolution: Innovation and Conformity in Implicit Knowledge Discovery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality ((SIPS,volume 3))

Abstract

One of the defining traits of humanity is our capacity for accumulating innovations. While many authors focus on the innovation process itself, Evolutionary Anthropology has become more interested in the accumulation part of this uniqueness, and in particularly whether something like an evolutionary account of cultural acquisition can explain it. In this chapter I discuss the role and sources of innovation in generating culture, and also the role of norms in preserving it. I demonstrate through two sets of simulation experiments a model of cultural evolution exploring the problem of cultural stability and change. The first models the impact of noisy transmission and modularity on cultural stability. The second looks at the impact on cultural change if a biologically-advantageous variant emerges of a single cultural trait.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more elaborate definitions see e.g. Whiten and Ham (1992) and Bryson (2009).

References

  • Aunger, R., editor (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist, 30:441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (1999). Plasticity, localization and language development. In Broman, S. and Fletcher, J. M., editors, The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders, pages 214–253. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M. L. (1999). How culture can guide evolution: An inquiry into gene/meme enhancement and opposition. Adaptive Behavior, 7(3/4):289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, E. and Krakauer, D. C. (2008). An end to endless forms: Epistasis, phenotype distribution bias, and non-uniform evolution. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(10):e1000202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. (1990). Elephants don’t play chess. In Maes, P., editor, Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back, pages 3–15. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3):139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J. (2000). Making modularity work: Combining memory systems and intelligent processes in a dialog agent. In Sloman, A., editor, AISB’00 Symposium on Designing a Functioning Mind, pages 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J. (2001). Intelligence by Design: Principles of Modularity and Coordination for Engineering Complex Adaptive Agents. PhD thesis, MIT, Department of EECS, Cambridge, MA. AI Technical Report 2001–003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J. (2008). Embodiment versus memetics. Mind & Society, 7(1):77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J. (2009). Representations underlying social learning and cultural evolution. Interaction Studies, 10(1):77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J. (2010). Cultural ratcheting results primarily from semantic compression. In Smith, A. D. M., Schouwstra, M., de Boer, B., and Smith, K., editors, The Evolution of Language 8, pages 50–57, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J., Ando, Y., and Lehmann, H. (2007). Agent-based models as scientific methodology: A case study analysing primate social behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B — Biology, 362(1485):1685–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, N. R. (2000). Physiology of Behavior. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, seventh edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. (2005). The case for massively modular models of mind. In Stainton, R., editor, Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, pages 205–225. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, L., Medina, A., and Toro, M. A. (2004). Hominid cultural transmission and the evolution of language. Biology and Philosophy, 19(5):721–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E. and Kashima, Y. (2007). Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: A situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6):1028–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith, E. (2002). Beating the bounds: Law, identity and territory in the New Europe. In Greenhouse, C., Warren, K., and Merz, E., editors, Ethnography in Unstable Places, pages 249–275. Duke University Press, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1995). Intuition pumps. In Brockman, J., editor, The Third Culture, pages 181–197. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus, A. and Franks, N. R. (2008). Individual and collective cognition in ants and other insects (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 11:215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T. (2005). The evolution of language: A comparative review. Biology and Philosophy, 20(2–3):193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R. and Richardson, T. (2006). Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature, 439(7073):153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1987). Categorial perception: A critical overview. In Harnad, S., editor, Categorial perception: The groundwork of perception. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. E. and Nowlan, S. J. (1987). How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems, 1:495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horswill, I. D. (1993). Specialization of Perceptual Processes. PhD thesis, MIT, Department of EECS, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, L., Range, F., Voelkl, B., Szucsich, A., Virányi, Z., and Miklosi, A. (2009). The evolution of imitation: What do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B — Biology, 364(1485):2299–2309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, B., Rutz, C., Weir, A. A. S., and Kacelnik, A. (2006). Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: Inherited action patterns and social influences. Animal Behaviour, 72(6):1329–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J. and Shennan, S. J. (2009). Innovation in cultural systems: Contributions from evolutionary anthropology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. and Manson, J. H. (2003). Traditions in monkeys. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12:71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. P. N. (1999). An optimal estimation approach to visual perception and learning. Vision Research, 39(11):1963–1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J. and Boyd, R. (2005). Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, R. (1998). Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(4):575–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and Hirschfeld, L. (2006). Culture and modularity. In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S., editors, The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition, volume 2, pages 149–164. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1):40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, L. and Palmer, C. (1997). Myths as instructions from ancestors: The example of Oedipus. Zygon, 32(3):341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. and Belpaeme, T. (2005). Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(4):469–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. and Kaplan, F. (1999). Bootstrapping grounded word semantics. In Briscoe, T., editor, Linguistic Evolution Through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., Singleton, I., Suzuki, A., Utami, S. S., and Merrill, M. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299(5603):102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, S. R. and Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3):257–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2002). Modes of religiosity: Towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 14(3–4):293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., and Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399:682–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A. and Ham, R. (1992). On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: Reappraisal of a century of research. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 21:239–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A. and van Schaik, C. P. (2007). The evolution of animal ‘cultures’ and social intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B — Biology, 362(1480):603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (2011). NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.

  • Wilkinson, A., Kuenstner, K., Mueller, J., and Huber, L. (2010). Social learning in a non-social reptile (geochelone carbonaria). Biology Letters, 6(5):614–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. C. (2009). Memetics does not provide a useful way of understanding cultural evolution. In Ayala, F. J. and Arp, R., editors, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology, pages 273–292. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. H. (1996a). The existence of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 8(7):1391–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. H. (1996b). The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 8(7):1341–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. A. (2008). An Agent-Independent Task Learning Framework. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was inspired by an informal talk by Dan Sperber in the Spring of 2008 at the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, where I was supported by the institute as the Hans Przibram Fellow with sabbatical assistance from the University of Bath. Thanks to Christophe Heintz for his discussion and comments on the original version of this paper, which was also presented to The Fall AAAI Symposium on Adaptive Agents in Cultural Contexts (AACC’08), and appeared in its informal proceedings (A. Davis and J. Ludwig, eds). Thanks to that symposium also for their comments. Effort on completing the final version was sponsored by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF, under grant number FA8655-10-1-3050.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna J. Bryson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryson, J.J. (2014). The Role of Stability in Cultural Evolution: Innovation and Conformity in Implicit Knowledge Discovery. In: Dignum, V., Dignum, F. (eds) Perspectives on Culture and Agent-based Simulations. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01952-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics