Skip to main content

Holographic Universe: The Ultimate Illusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essays on the Frontiers of Modern Astrophysics and Cosmology

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((POPULAR))

  • 1330 Accesses

Abstract

What distinguishes reality and illusion? We may be able to convince ourselves that we can distinguish between the two. However, on closer analysis, the entire exercise is futile and the process itself is murky. Are we independent and individual observers of the cosmos or just an inseparable part of the universe incapable of making unbiased observations? Can our models of reality become reality itself?

There is a philosophy that says that if something is unobservable – unobservable in principle – it is not part of science. If there is no way to falsify or confirm a hypothesis, it belongs to the realm of metaphysical speculation, together with astrology and spiritualism. By that standard, most of the universe has no scientific reality – it’s just a figment of our imaginations.

– Leonard Susskind (The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics 2008)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • A Penn State electronic Classics Series publication: http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/upanishads/upanishads1.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  • Barbour, I. G. (1974). Myths, models and paradigms. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. J. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘Hidden’Variables I, II. Physical Review, 85, 166–193.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. J. (1953). Reply to a criticism of the causal re-interpretation of quantum theory. Physical Review, 85, 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (2002). Wholeness and the implicate order (Reissue edn.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (1987). Science, order, and creativity. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, J. P., & Peat, F. D. (1984). Looking glass universe: The emerging science of wholeness. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. (1942). The physical interpretation of quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 180, 1–40.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., & Rosen, N. (1935). Physical Review, 48, 73.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. W., & Wheeler, J. A. (1962). Physical Review, 128, 919.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, A. (1995). The self-aware universe. Tarcher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haisch, B. (2009). God theory, the: Universes, zero-point fields, and what’s behind it all. Weiser Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, G. (2002). Routledge philosophy guidebook to descartes and the meditations (Routledge Philosophy GuideBooks). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, C. J., & Jackson, M. G. (2009). Holographic geometry and noise in matrix theory. Physical Review D, 79(12), 8.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto, T., Tatezono, M., Hoshi, T., & Shinoda, H. (2008, August). Airborne ultrasound tactile display. SIGGRAPH 2008 New Tech Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Rees, D. A. (1963). The republic of Plato (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, J. (1985). The ending of time (Dialogue) (1st edn.). Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, R. (2010). Biocentrism: How life and consciousness are the keys to understanding the true nature of the universe (1st edn.). BenBella Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA’s Chandra Finds Youngest Nearby Black Hole - ScienceNewsline. (2010). NASA’s Chandra finds youngest nearby black hole - ScienceNewsline. [ONLINE]. Available at http://www.sciencenewsline.com/articles/2010111602380000.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2012.

  • Nikodem, P. (2010). Radial motion into an Einstein-Rosen bridge. arXiv:0902.1994v3 [gr-qc] 13 Apr 2010 Physics Letters B, 687(2–3), 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, A. (1994). Creation revisited. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, D. (2009). The conscious universe: The scientific truth of psychic phenomena (Reprint edn.). HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, V. J. (1995). The unconscious quantum (1st edn.). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, V. J. (2012). Available at: http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Quantum/QuantumConsciousness.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.

  • Susskind, L. (1995). The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11), 6377–6396.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. (2008). The black hole war: My battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanics. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. (2009). The black hole war: My battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanics (Reprint edn.). Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘T Hooft, G. (2000). The holographic principle. In Z. Antonino (Ed.), Basics and highlights in fundamental physics (pp. 72–100). Erice, Sicily: European Physical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, M. (1993). Mysticism and the new physics (Compass) (Revised ed.). Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, M. (2011). The holographic universe: The revolutionary theory of reality (Reprint edn.). Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, M., & McTaggart, L. (2011). The holographic universe: The revolutionary theory of reality. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedral, V. (2010). Decoding reality: The universe as quantum information (First Thusth ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1958). The computer and the brain. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Burks, A. (1966). Theory of self-reproducing automata. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngest-Ever Nearby Black Hole Discovered – NASA Science. (2011). Available at: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/14nov_babyblackhole/. Accessed 13 Feb 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mathew, S. (2014). Holographic Universe: The Ultimate Illusion. In: Essays on the Frontiers of Modern Astrophysics and Cosmology. Springer Praxis Books(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01887-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics