Skip to main content

Quality of Microcalcification Segmentation in Mammograms by Clustering Algorithms

  • Conference paper
International Joint Conference SOCO’13-CISIS’13-ICEUTE’13

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among women worldwide. Mammography is one of the non-invasive methods to find breast tumors, which is very useful in the detection of cancer. Microcalcifications are one of the anomalies of this disease, and these appear as small white spots on the images. Several computer-aided systems (CAD) have been developed for the detection of anomalies related to the disease. However, one of the critical parts is the segmentation process, as the rate of detection of anomalies in the breast by mammography largely depends on this process. In addition, a low detection endangers women’s lives, while a high detection of suspicious elements have excessive cost. Hence, in this work we do a comparative study of segmentation algorithms, specifically three of them derived from the family of c-Means, and we use the NU (Non-Uniformity) measure as a quality indicator of segmentation results. For the study we use 10 images of the MIAS database, and the algorithms are applied to the regions of interest (ROI). Results are interesting, the novel method of sub-segmentation allows continuous and gradual adjustment, which is better adapted to the regions of micro calcification, and this results in smaller NU values. The NU measure can be used as an indication of quality, which depends on the number of pixels and the homogeneity of the segmented regions, although it should be put in the context of the application to avoid making misinterpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pham, D.L., Xu, C., Prince, J.L.: A Survey of Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2(4), 315–338 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sampat, P.M., Markey, M.K., Bovik, A.C.: Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography. In: Bovik, A.C. (ed.) Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2nd edn., pp. 1195–1217. Academic Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, N., Laine, A.F., Marquez, G., Levsky, J.M., Gohagan, J.K.: Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to improve CT lung cancer screening. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 136–146 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez-Cisnero, R.R., Terashima-Marn, H.: Evolutionary neural networks applied to the classification of microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms. Proc. IEEE Congr. Evol. Comput., 2459–2466 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tang, J., Rangayyan, R.M., Xu, J., El Naga, I., Yang, Y.: Computeraided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: Recent advances. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 13(2), 236–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bocciglione, G., Chainese, A., Picariello, A.: Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Comput. Biol. Med. 30(5), 267–286 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Y.J.: A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation. Pattern Recogn. 29(8), 1335–1346 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proc. 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 281–297. University of California Press, Berkeley (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bezdek, J.C., Keller, J., Krishnapuram, R., Pal, N.R.: Fuzzy models and algorithms for pattern recognition and image processing, Boston, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jain, A.K., Dubes, R.C.: Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Runkler, T.A.: Ant colony optimization of clustering models. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 20(12), 1233–1251 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn, J.C.: A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters. J. Cybernetics 3(3), 32–57 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pal, N.R., Pal, K., Keller, J.M., Bezdek, J.C.: A possibilitic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. 13(4), 517–530 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dengler, J., Behrens, S., Desega, J.F.: Segmentation of Microcalcifications in Mammograms. IEEE T. Med. Imaging 12(4), 634–642 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serra, J.: Images analysis and mathematical morphological. Academic Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pal, N., Pal, S.: A review on image segmentation techniques. IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. 13(4), 517–530 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu, J., Lee, S., Wong, S., Yeh, J., Wang, A., Wu, H.: Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. Med. Imag. Grap. 29(6), 419–429 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ojeda-Magaña, B., Quintanilla-Domínguez, J., Ruelas, R., Andina, D.: Images sub-segmentation with the PFCM clustering algorithm. In: Proc. 7th IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Informatics, pp. 499–503 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramón O. Guardado-Medina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guardado-Medina, R.O., Ojeda-Magaña, B., Quintanilla-Domínguez, J., Ruelas, R., Andina, D. (2014). Quality of Microcalcification Segmentation in Mammograms by Clustering Algorithms. In: Herrero, Á., et al. International Joint Conference SOCO’13-CISIS’13-ICEUTE’13. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 239. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01854-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01854-6_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01853-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01854-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics