Skip to main content

The Topology of Spatial Scenes in ℝ2

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8116))

Abstract

Spatial scenes are abstractions of some geographic reality, focusing on the spatial objects identified and their spatial relations. Such qualitative models of space enable spatial querying, computational comparisons for similarity, and the generation of verbal descriptions. A specific strength of spatial scenes is that they offer a focus on particular types of spatial relations. While past approaches to representing spatial scenes, by recording exhaustively all binary spatial relations, capture accurately how pairs of objects are related to each other, they may fail to distinguish certain spatial properties that are enabled by an ensemble of objects. This paper overcomes such limitations by introducing a model that considers (1) the topology of potentially complexly structured spatial objects, (2) modeling applicable relations by their boundary contacts, and (3) considering exterior partitions and exterior relations. Such qualitative scene descriptions have all ingredients to generate topologically correct graphical renderings or verbal scene descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, C., Franzosa, R.: Introduction to Topology: Pure and Applied. Pearson Prentice Hall (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aktouf, Z., Bertrand, G., Perroton, L.: A Three-Dimensional Holes Closing Algorithm. Pattern Recognition Letters 23(5), 523–531 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruns, T., Egenhofer, M.: Similarity of Spatial Scenes. In: Kraak, M., Molenaar, M. (eds.) Seventh International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, pp. 31–42 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cassati, R., Varzi, A.: Holes and Other Superficialities. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, S.K., Shi, Q., Yan, C.: Iconic Indexing by 2-D Strings. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 9(3), 413–428 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: Topological Invariants for Lines. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engingeering 10(1), 38–54 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: A Model for Representing Topological Relationships between Complex Geometric Features in Spatial Databases. Information Sciences 90(1-4), 121–136 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P., Califano, G.: Composite Regions in Topological Queries. Information Systems 20(7), 579–594 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn, A., Bennett, B., Gooday, J., Gotts, N.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning with the Region Connection Calculus. GeoInformatica 1(3), 275–316 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohn, A., Hazarika, S.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning: An Overview. Fundamenta Informaticae 46(1-2), 2–32 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn, A., Renz, J.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning. In: van Hermelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Handbook of Knowledge Representation, pp. 551–596 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cohn, A., Varzi, A.: Mereotopological Connection. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32(4), 357–390 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Egenhofer, M.: A Model for Detailed Binary Topological Relationships. Geomatica 47(3), 261–273 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Egenhofer, M., Franzosa, R.: Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2), 161–174 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Egenhofer, M., Herring, J.: Categorizing Binary Topological Relationships Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases. Department of Surveying Engineering. University of Maine, Orono (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Egenhofer, M.J.: A Reference System for Topological Relations between Compound Spatial Objects. In: Heuser, C.A., Pernul, G. (eds.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5833, pp. 307–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Egenhofer, M.: Query Processing in Spatial-Query-by-Sketch. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 8(4), 403–424 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Egenhofer, M.: Deriving the Composition of Binary Topological Relations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 5(2), 133–149 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Egenhofer, M., Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: Topological Relations between Regions with Holes. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 8(2), 129–142 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Egenhofer, M., Dube, M.: Topological Relations from Metric Refinements. In: Wolfson, O., Agrawal, D., Lu, C.-T. (eds.) 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, ACM-GIS 2009, pp. 158–167 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Egenhofer, M., Franzosa, R.: On the Equivalence of Topological Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(2), 133–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Egenhofer, M., Herring, J.: A Mathematical Framework for the Definition of Topological Relationships. In: Brassel, K., Kishimoto, H. (eds.) Fourth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, pp. 803–813 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Egenhofer, M., Vasardani, M.: Spatial Reasoning with a Hole. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 303–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Freeman, J.: The Modeling of Spatial Relations. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 4(2), 156–171 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Galton, A.: Spatial and Temporal Knowledge Representation. Earth Science Informatics 2(3), 169–187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Galton, A.: Modes of Overlap. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 9(1), 61–79 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guesgen, H.: Spatial Reasoning Based on Allen’s Temporal Logic. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herring, J.: The Mathematical Modeling of Spatial and Non-Spatial Information in Geographic Information Systems. In: Mark, D., Frank, A. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, pp. 313–350. Kluwer Academic (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li, S., Cohn, A.: Reasoning with Topological and Directional Spatial Information. Computational Intelligence 28(4), 579–616 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Nabil, M., Shephard, J., Ngu, A.: 2D Projection Interval Relationships: A Symbolic Representation of Spatial Relationships. In: Egenhofer, M., Herring, J.R. (eds.) SSD 1995. LNCS, vol. 951, pp. 292–309. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Nedas, K., Egenhofer, M.: Spatial-Scene Similarity Queries. Transactions in GIS 12(6), 661–681 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. OGC: OpenGIS Geography Markup Language (GML) Encoding Standard (2005), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/gml

  33. OGC: OGC Abstract Specifications OpenGIS Consortium (OGC) (1999), http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs.htm

  34. Randell, D., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.: A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connection. In: Third International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Randell, D., Cohn, A., Cui, Z.: Computing Transitivity Tables: A Challenge for Automated Theorem Provers. In: Kapur, D. (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607, Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rodríguez, M.A., Egenhofer, M., Blaser, A.: Query Pre-processing of Topological Constraints: Comparing a Composition-Based with Neighborhood-Based Approach. In: Hadzilacos, T., Manolopoulos, Y., Roddick, J., Theodoridis, Y. (eds.) SSTD 2003. LNCS, vol. 2750, pp. 362–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneider, M., Behr, T.: Topological Relationships between Complex Spatial Objects. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 31(1), 39–81 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma, J.: Integrated Topology- and Direction-Reasoning in GIS. In: Craglia, M., Onsrud, H. (eds.) Second ESF-NSF Summer Institute in Geographic Information, pp. 435–447. Taylor & Francis (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sistla, A., Yu, C.: Reasoning about Qualitative Spatial Relationships. Journal of Automated Reasoning 25(4), 291–328 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Tryfona, N., Egenhofer, M.: Consistency Among Parts and Aggregates: A Computational Model. Transactions in GIS 1(3), 189–206 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Varzi, A.: Parts, Wholes, and Part-Whole Relations: The Prospects of Mereotopology. Data & Knowledge Engineering 20(3), 259–286 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Varzi, A.: Spatial Reasoning and Ontology: Parts, Wholes, and Locations. In: Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I., van Benthem, J. (eds.) Handbook of Spatial Logics, pp. 945–1038 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vasardani, M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Comparing Relations with a Multi-holed Region. In: Hornsby, K.S., Claramunt, C., Denis, M., Ligozat, G. (eds.) COSIT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5756, pp. 159–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Worboys, M., Bofakos, P.: A Canonical Model for a Class of Areal Spatial Objects. In: Abel, D.J., Ooi, B.-C. (eds.) SSD 1993. LNCS, vol. 692, pp. 36–52. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lewis, J.A., Dube, M.P., Egenhofer, M.J. (2013). The Topology of Spatial Scenes in ℝ2 . In: Tenbrink, T., Stell, J., Galton, A., Wood, Z. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01789-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01790-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics