Skip to main content

Image Quality Online

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Image Quality in Medicine

Part of the book series: Understanding Medical Informatics ((UMI))

  • 1042 Accesses

Abstract

If you happen to be in medical imaging for some time, you might recall those wonderful scholastic battles of the 1990s: can computer monitors provide the same diagnostic display quality as printed film? As with anything else asked from your IT department, the original answer was “No”, or rather “No!!!”, multiplied by the imperfections of the early computer monitors, and raised to the power of notorious clinical conservatism. And while most kept printing and arguing, others preferred to invest the intervening years in perfecting the digital display technology – eventually winning the market and the dispute. Oh those acid-smelling printing monsters of the old days… “Where are the snows of yesteryear?”

To prepare asparagus, you will need to rinse the spears and break off the tough ends.

After that, how you cook asparagus is up to you.

Online recipe for cooking asparagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    François Villon.

  2. 2.

    This is the most common requirement in what is known as REST architecture. REST stands for REpresentational State Transfer; read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_state_transfer

  3. 3.

    So a link like http://MeWebPACSServer?PatName=JoeSmith&PatID=123456, entered by hand or generated by another third-party application, will launch the web viewer with Joe Smith’s images already loaded into it.

  4. 4.

    Making the ironic “Write Once, Debug Everywhere” a new Java slogan.

  5. 5.

    Lossy JPEG is used more frequently as it is natively supported by all web browsers – which is not the case for JPEG2000 and other advanced compression algorithms. Nevertheless, a good diagnostic thin client should always have a lossless compression option.

  6. 6.

    Such as Motion C5t from www.motioncomputing.com

  7. 7.

    www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=rca&sub=rsna_2011&pag=dis&ItemID=97689

  8. 8.

    Part 18 of DICOM standard, ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/2006/06_18pu.pdf

  9. 9.

    Medical Imaging Network Transport, https://code.google.com/p/medical-imaging-network-transport/

  10. 10.

    We’ll discuss W/L more in the final part of this book.

  11. 11.

    I’d like you to note this very important thing, which we touched upon in passing: with web viewing in particular, the choice of functionality may completely define the choice of implementation. This is why it’s so hard to improve an ill-designed web viewer: it may be easier to rewrite it from scratch, changing the underlying implementation.

  12. 12.

    Some web viewers are smart enough to sense the size of the browser memory, so they know how many high-quality images can be prefetched.

  13. 13.

    Never underestimate the inertia of hospital IT departments, which just love to run systems several years behind the market. The dinosaur computers you might find in the hospital’s “Jurassic Parks” may be extinct anywhere else.

References

  • Abboud, S., Weiss, F., Siegel, E. & Jeudy, J., 2013. TB or Not TB: Interreader and Intrareader Variability in Screening Diagnosis on an iPad versus a Traditional Display. Journal of the American College of Radiology, pp. 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, L. et al., 2012. Enhancing low-dose CT images in the EHR based on HTML5. s.l., s.n., pp. 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. G., French, T. & Segovis, C., 2011. TCP/IP Optimization over Wide Area Networks: Implications for Teleradiology. J Digit Imaging, pp. 314–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. G. et al., 2012. Extreme Compression for Extreme Conditions: Pilot Study to Identify Optimal Compression of CT Images Using MPEG-4 Video Compression. J Digit Imaging, 25, pp. 764–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianykh, O. S., 2012. DICOM: A Practical Introduction and Survival Guide. Berlin, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pianykh, O.S. (2014). Image Quality Online. In: Digital Image Quality in Medicine. Understanding Medical Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01760-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01760-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01759-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01760-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics