Generator Matrix Approach to Linear Block Codes

  • Giovanni CancellieriEmail author
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)


A linear transformation of a vector is firstly introduced. A linear code, described by means of its generator matrix, turns us to be a generalization of this concept. The right-inverse of such matrix is associated to the inverse vector transformation. The polynomial description of a linear block code is given adopting a proper generator polynomial, factor of a certain binomial. This unique polynomial is the element shifting in the rows of the generator matrix of a strict-sense time-invariant code described in this way. Code shortening, code punctuation, the concatenation of more than one code are discussed. The concept of subcode is introduced. In this framework code extension appears as a particular form of direct serial code concatenation. The class of cyclic codes is widely investigated, starting from the factorization of any type of binomials in a binary field. Many families of cyclic codes are presented. The structure of BCH codes and their design procedure are analysed. The encoder circuits able to construct any type of polynomial code exhibit evolutions which can be displayed in a suitable state diagram. It is useful to distinguish between systematic and nonsystematic encoders. The main properties of a polynomial code are evidenced in its state diagram. Direct product codes are described. Their generator matrix is calculated. Expressions for the minimum distance and the numbers of low-weight code words are derived. Lengthened cyclic codes and modified lengthened cyclic codes are treated, the latter representing a first step towards the concept of convolutional codes. Generalized parity check codes are discussed together with lengthened cyclic codes. Direct product codes are interpreted as a particular class of modified lengthened codes. The above topics are extended to the case of non-binary fields. We can have here cyclic or, more in general, pseudo-cyclic codes. Minimum-distance-separable codes, and in particular Reed-Solomon codes, are described. Finally a generator trellis, representing the temporal evolution of the state diagram, is constructed. The number of states in its stages gives a measure of the decoding computational complexity in a soft-decision decoding algorithm.


  1. Bose RC, Ray-Chaudhuri DK (1960) On a class of error correcting binary group codes. Inf Contr 3:68–79CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossert M (1999) Channel coding for telecommunications. Wiley, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  3. Calderbank AR, Forney GD, Vardy A (1998) Minimal tail-biting trellises: the Golay code and more. In: Proceedings of ISIT 1998, Cambridge, USA, p 255Google Scholar
  4. Cancellieri G, Marchesani R (2000) Transmission method using variable length code. Eur Patent EP 0 998070 A2Google Scholar
  5. Clark GC, Cain JB (1983) Error correcting coding for digital communications. Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. De Bruijn NG (1946) A combinatorial problem. J London Math Soc 21:167–169MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Elias P (1954) Error-free coding. IRE Trans Inf Theor 4:29–37CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Forney GD (1988) Coset codes. Part II: binary lattices and related codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 34:1152–1187CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Golay MJE (1949) Notes on digital coding. Proc IRE 37:657Google Scholar
  10. Gorenstein DC, Zierler N (1961) A class of error correcting codes in p m symbols. J SIAM 9:207–214zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagenauer J, Offer E, Papke L (1996) Iterative decoding of binary block and convolutional codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 42:429–445CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hocquenghem A (1959) Codes correcteurs d’erreurs (Error correcting codes). Chiffres 2:147–156Google Scholar
  13. Krishna A, Sarwate DW (1990) Pseudocyclic maximum-distance separable codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 36:880–884CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuriata E (2008) Creation of unequal error protection codes for two groups of symbols. Int J Appl Mat Comp Sci 18:251–257zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. MacWilliams FJ, Sloane NJA (1977) The theory of error correcting codes. North-Holland Publishing Company, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Muder DJ (1988) Minimal trellises for block codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 34:1049–1053CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Peterson WW, Weldon EJ (1972) Error-correcting codes. MIT Press, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Reed IS, Solomon G (1960) Polynomial codes over certain finite fields. J SIAM 8:300–304zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Vardy A, Be’ery Y (1994) Maximum likelihood soft decision decoding of BCH codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 40:546–554CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Viterbi AJ (1967) Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 13:260–269CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Wicker SB (1995) Error control systems for digital communications and storage. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information EngineeringPolytechnic University of MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations