Skip to main content

1) Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Impossibility in Modern Private Law
  • 864 Accesses

Abstract

Impossibility is a concept dating back to Roman law. Therefore at first sight it seems that there is really not much to write about impossibility anymore. However, the treatment of impossibility in the modern private law and the reactions of national lawmakers (specifically, German, Swiss and Turkish lawmakers) to such treatment show that impossibility is still an item of interest in the study of contemporary private law. The main objective of this book is to analyze the treatment of impossibility in modern private law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Initial subjective impossibility did not cause voidness of the contract. Zimmermann, Law of Obligations, p. 687; Immenhauser, p. 290; Mousourakis, p. 191.

  2. 2.

    The unofficial translation of the provision, which was proposed in the Discussion Draft (Diskussionsentwurf) reads as follows: “If the obligation is not money debt, the debtor may refuse the performance to the extent that and as long as he is unable to provide these with the effort, which he is obliged according to the content and nature of the obligatory relationship. The rights of the creditor are determined in accordance with §§ 280 to 282 and 323.

References

  • Der Bundesminister der Justiz: Diskussionsentwurf eines Schuldrechtsmodernisierungsgesetzes, Der Bundesminister der Justiz, Berlin 2000. (Cited as Discussion Draft)

    Google Scholar 

  • Immenhauser, Martin: Das Dogma von Vertrag und Delikt, Böhlau, Köln 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousourakis, George: Fundamentals of Roman Private Law, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Reinhard: Law of Obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996. (Cited as: Zimmermann, Law of Obligations)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aksoy, H.C. (2014). 1) Introduction. In: Impossibility in Modern Private Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01704-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics