Skip to main content

The Dangers of Using Intention as a Surrogate for Retention in Brand Positioning Decision Support Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the dangers of using intention as a surrogate for retention in a decision support system (DSS) for brand positioning. An empirical study is conducted, using structural equations modeling and both data from the internal transactional database and a survey. The study is aimed at evaluating whether the DSS recommends different product benefits for brand positioning when intention is used as opposed to retention as a criterion variable. The results show that different product benefits are recommended contingent upon the criterion variable (intention vs. retention). The findings also indicate that the strength of the structural relationships is inflated when intention is used. This study is limited in that it investigates only one industry; the newspaper industry. This research provides guidance for brand managers in selecting the most appropriate benefit for brand positioning and advices against the use of intention as opposed to retention in DSSs. To the best of our knowledge this study is the first to challenge and refute the commonly held belief that intention is a valid surrogate for retention in a DSS for brand positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buckinx, W., Verstraeten, G., & Van den Poel, D. (2007). Predicting customer loyalty using the internal transactional database. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris, S. P. (2005). Trust and commitment influences on customer retention: Insights from business-to-business services. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1997). From marketing mix to relationship marketing towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 35(4), 839–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. D., & Roos, I. (2005). The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., & Klee, A. (1997). The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development. Psychology & Marketing, 14(8), 737–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (2005). Culture and consumption II: Markets, meaning, and brand management. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., Duckitt, J., & Wagner, C. (2010). A cross-cultural test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2791–2813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V. G. (1997). Why consumers don’t always accurately predict their own future behavior. Marketing Letters, 8(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. W., & Werbe, R. A. (1973). Multivariate analysis of brand loyalty for major household appliances. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, M., Hennig-Thurau, T., Gremler, D. D., Gwinner, K. P., & Wiertz, C. (2009). Toward a theory of repeat purchase drivers for consumer services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The loyalty effect. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, T. J., Dethloff, C., & Westberg, S. J. (2001). Advancements in laddering. In T. J. Reynolds & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Understanding consumer decision making, the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy (pp. 92–118). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L. J., & Czepiel, J. A. (1984). A marketing approach to customer retention. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 230–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S., & Eastlick, M. A. (1998). The hierarchical influence of personal values on mall shopping attitude and behavior. Journal of Retailing, 74(1), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, A., & Sverke, M. (2000). The interactive effect of job involvement and organizational commitment on job turnover revisited: A note on the mediating role of turnover intention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory – Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Ballings .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ballings, M., Van den Poel, D. (2014). The Dangers of Using Intention as a Surrogate for Retention in Brand Positioning Decision Support Systems. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Janning, R. (eds) Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01595-8_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics