Abstract
Family and dynamic systems theories have emerged from basic principles of general systems theory (von Bertalanffy General systems theory. George Braziller. New York, 1968). In this chapter, we illustrate how one of the modeling frameworks being used in ecology (nonlinear dynamic models) can be used to study family systems. First, we review some of the theoretical principles at the core of dynamic systems theory that can be applied to the study of families. Second, we briefly summarize how the taxonomies used in biological ecology to describe interspecies interactions (e.g., symbiosis) have been articulated using the general mathematical framework for nonlinear dynamic models. Third, we consider how this ecological framework is being applied in the study of family systems. Fourth, we introduce an example with data collected from a married couple around the birth of their first child using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) multiple-burst design. Finally, we indicate what we anticipate will be fruitful pursuits for future thinking and research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Begon, M., Harper, J. L., & Townsend, C. R. (1996). Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities, Third edition. Cambridge: Blackwell Science.
Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Wall, & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 195–218). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.
Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
Butner, J., Amazeen, P. G., & Mulvey, G. M. (2005). Multilevel modeling of two cyclical processes: Extending differential structural equation modeling to nonlinear coupled systems. Psychological Methods, 10, 159–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.159.
Butner, J., Diamond, L. M., & Hicks, A. M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 431–455. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00164.x.
Chow, S.-M., Haltigan, J. D., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). Dynamic infant-parent affect coupling during face-to-face/still-face. Emotion , 10, 101–114.
Chow, S.-M., Zu, J., Shifren, K., & Zhang, G. (2011). Dynamic factor analysis models with time-varying parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 303–339.
Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528.
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267.
Erdman, D., & Morelock, M. M. (1996). A study of kinetics: The estimation and simulation of systems of first-order differential equations. Proceedings of the 21st Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, 1407–1414. http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/papers/kinetics.pdf.
Felmlee, D. H. (2007). Application of dynamic systems analysis to dyadic interactions. In A. D. Ong & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 409–422). New York: Oxford University Press.
Felmlee, D. H., & Greenberg, D. F. (1999). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23, 155–180.
Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations using dynamic factor analysis. Emotion , 3, 344–360.
Ferrer, E., & Steele, J. (2012). Dynamic systems analysis of affective processes in dyadic interactions using differential equations. In G. R. Hancock & J. R. Harring (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 111–134). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Fogel, A. (1993). Two principles of communication: Co-regulation and framing. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 9–22). London: Routledge.
Ford, D., & Lerner, R. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park: Sage.
Forgas, J. P., & Ciarrochi, J. V. (2002). On managing moods: Evidence for the role of homeostatic cognitive strategies in affect regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 336–345.
Gottlieb, G. (1997). Commentary: A systems view of psychobiological development. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), The lifespan development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological, and psychosocial perspectives: A synthesis (pp. 76–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Murray, J. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: Dynamic mathematical nonlinear modeling of newlywed marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 3–19.
Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002a). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2002b). A general systems theory of marriage: Nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 326–340.
Granic, I. (2005). Timing is everything: Developmental psychopathology from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Review, 25, 386–407. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.005.
Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606–617.
Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2005). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.
Larsen, R. J., & Prizmic, Z. (2005). Affect regulation. In L. F. Barrett, P. M. Niedenthal, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion and consciousness (pp. 40–61). New York: Guilford Press.
Lewis, M. D., Zimmerman, S., Hollenstein, T., & Lamey, A. V. (2004). Reorganization in coping behavior at 1½ years: Dynamic systems and normative change. Developmental Science, 7, 56–73.
Liebovitch, L. S., Vallacher, R. R., & Michaels, J. (2010). Dynamics of cooperation-competition interaction models. Peace and Conflict, 16, 175–188.
Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co.
Lunkenheimer, E. S., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). Developmental psychopathology: Maladaptive and adaptive attractors in children’s close relationships. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Recent advances and future directions in the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems psychology (pp. 282–306). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lunkenheimer, E. S., Hollenstein, T., Wang, J., & Shields, A. M. (2012). Flexibility and attractors in context: Family emotion socialization patterns and children’s emotion regulation in late childhood. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 269–291.
Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 292–300.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289–302.
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Ram, N. (2010). Dynamic modeling and optimal control of intra-individual variation: A computational paradigm for non-ergodic psychological processes. In S. M. Chow, E. Ferrer, & F. Hsieh (Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 13–35). New York: Routledge.
Murray, J. D. (2002). Mathematical biology: I. An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Downs, L. Liben, & D. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of development, the environment, and aesthetics: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213–240). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Noone, R. J. (1988). Symbiosis, the family, and natural systems. Family Process, 27, 285–292.
Paracer, S., & Ahmadjian, V. (2000). Symbiosis: An introduction to biological association (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791.
Ram, N., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2007). Modeling intraindividual and intracontextual change: Operationalizing developmental contextualism. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 325–342). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ram, N., & Pedersen, A. B. (2008). Dyadic models emerging from the longitudinal structural equation modeling tradition: Parallels with ecological models of interspecifc interactions. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 87–105). New York: Routledge.
Ramsay, J. O., Hooker, G., Cao, J., & Campbell, D. (2007). Parameter estimation in ordinary differential equations: A generalized smoothing approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69, 741–796.
Ramsey, J. O., Hooker, G., & Graves, S. (2009). Functional data analysis with R and Matlab. New York: Springer.
Sameroff, A. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology Vol. 1: History, theory and methods (4th ed., pp. 237–294). New York: Wiley.
Sameroff, A. (1994). Developmental systems and family functioning. In R. D. Parke & S. G. Kellman (Eds.), Exploring family relationships with other social contexts. (pp. 199–214). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Sbarra, D. A., & Ferrer, E. (2006). The structure and process of emotional experience following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Dynamic factor analyses of love, anger, and sadness. Emotion , 6, 224–238.
Schneirla, T. C. (1957). The concept of development in comparative psychology. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 78–108). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shiyko, M. P., & Ram, N. (2011). Conceptualizing and estimating process speed in studies employing ecological momentary assessment designs: A multilevel variance decomposition approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 875–899.
Shumway, R. H., & Stoffer, D. S. (2006). Time series analysis and its applications: With R examples (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Stadler, B., & Dixon, T. (2008). Mutualism: Ants and their insect partners. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Steele, J. S., & Ferrer, E. (2011). Latent differential equation modeling of self-regulatory and coregulatory affective process. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 956–984.
Steele, J. S., Ferrer, E. & Nesselroade, J.R. (in press). An idiographic approach to estimating models of dyadic interactions with differential equations. Psychometrika.
Stone, A., Shiffman, S., Atienza, A. A., & Nebeling, L. (2007). The Science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tan, X., Shiyko, M. P., Li, R., Li, Y., & Dierker, L. (2011). Intensive longitudinal data and the time-varying effects model. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 61–77.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563–633). New York: Wiley.
Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(1), 1–103.
van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16, 7–33.
van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105(4), 634–677. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.634-677.
von Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller.
Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 118, 558–560.
Werbel, J., & Walter, M. H. (2002). Changing views of work and family roles: A symbiotic perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 293–298.
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wohlwill, J. F. (1991). Relations between method and theory in developmental research: A partial-isomophism view. In P. Van Geert & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 91–138). New York: Plenum Press.
Yieh, K., Tsai, Y.-F., & Kuo, C.-Y. (2004). An exploratory study of “parasites” in Taiwan. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 527–539.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support provided by the National Institute of Health (Grants RC1-AG035645, R21-AG032379, R21-AG033109, R03-CA171809) and the Penn State Social Science Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ram, N., Shiyko, M., Lunkenheimer, E., Doerksen, S., Conroy, D. (2014). Families as Coordinated Symbiotic Systems: Making use of Nonlinear Dynamic Models. In: McHale, S., Amato, P., Booth, A. (eds) Emerging Methods in Family Research. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01561-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01562-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)