Skip to main content

Families as Coordinated Symbiotic Systems: Making use of Nonlinear Dynamic Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Methods in Family Research

Abstract

Family and dynamic systems theories have emerged from basic principles of general systems theory (von Bertalanffy General systems theory. George Braziller. New York, 1968). In this chapter, we illustrate how one of the modeling frameworks being used in ecology (nonlinear dynamic models) can be used to study family systems. First, we review some of the theoretical principles at the core of dynamic systems theory that can be applied to the study of families. Second, we briefly summarize how the taxonomies used in biological ecology to describe interspecies interactions (e.g., symbiosis) have been articulated using the general mathematical framework for nonlinear dynamic models. Third, we consider how this ecological framework is being applied in the study of family systems. Fourth, we introduce an example with data collected from a married couple around the birth of their first child using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) multiple-burst design. Finally, we indicate what we anticipate will be fruitful pursuits for future thinking and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Begon, M., Harper, J. L., & Townsend, C. R. (1996). Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities, Third edition. Cambridge: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Wall, & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 195–218). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butner, J., Amazeen, P. G., & Mulvey, G. M. (2005). Multilevel modeling of two cyclical processes: Extending differential structural equation modeling to nonlinear coupled systems. Psychological Methods, 10, 159–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butner, J., Diamond, L. M., & Hicks, A. M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 431–455. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00164.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S.-M., Haltigan, J. D., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). Dynamic infant-parent affect coupling during face-to-face/still-face. Emotion , 10, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S.-M., Zu, J., Shifren, K., & Zhang, G. (2011). Dynamic factor analysis models with time-varying parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 303–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdman, D., & Morelock, M. M. (1996). A study of kinetics: The estimation and simulation of systems of first-order differential equations. Proceedings of the 21st Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, 1407–1414. http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/papers/kinetics.pdf.

  • Felmlee, D. H. (2007). Application of dynamic systems analysis to dyadic interactions. In A. D. Ong & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 409–422). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D. H., & Greenberg, D. F. (1999). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23, 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations using dynamic factor analysis. Emotion , 3, 344–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, E., & Steele, J. (2012). Dynamic systems analysis of affective processes in dyadic interactions using differential equations. In G. R. Hancock & J. R. Harring (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 111–134). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, A. (1993). Two principles of communication: Co-regulation and framing. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 9–22). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Lerner, R. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., & Ciarrochi, J. V. (2002). On managing moods: Evidence for the role of homeostatic cognitive strategies in affect regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 336–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. (1997). Commentary: A systems view of psychobiological development. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), The lifespan development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological, and psychosocial perspectives: A synthesis (pp. 76–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Murray, J. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: Dynamic mathematical nonlinear modeling of newlywed marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002a). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2002b). A general systems theory of marriage: Nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granic, I. (2005). Timing is everything: Developmental psychopathology from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Review, 25, 386–407. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2005). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Prizmic, Z. (2005). Affect regulation. In L. F. Barrett, P. M. Niedenthal, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion and consciousness (pp. 40–61). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. D., Zimmerman, S., Hollenstein, T., & Lamey, A. V. (2004). Reorganization in coping behavior at 1½ years: Dynamic systems and normative change. Developmental Science, 7, 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitch, L. S., Vallacher, R. R., & Michaels, J. (2010). Dynamics of cooperation-competition interaction models. Peace and Conflict, 16, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunkenheimer, E. S., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). Developmental psychopathology: Maladaptive and adaptive attractors in children’s close relationships. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Recent advances and future directions in the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems psychology (pp. 282–306). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunkenheimer, E. S., Hollenstein, T., Wang, J., & Shields, A. M. (2012). Flexibility and attractors in context: Family emotion socialization patterns and children’s emotion regulation in late childhood. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 269–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. C. M., & Ram, N. (2010). Dynamic modeling and optimal control of intra-individual variation: A computational paradigm for non-ergodic psychological processes. In S. M. Chow, E. Ferrer, & F. Hsieh (Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 13–35). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. D. (2002). Mathematical biology: I. An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Downs, L. Liben, & D. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of development, the environment, and aesthetics: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213–240). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noone, R. J. (1988). Symbiosis, the family, and natural systems. Family Process, 27, 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paracer, S., & Ahmadjian, V. (2000). Symbiosis: An introduction to biological association (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, N., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2007). Modeling intraindividual and intracontextual change: Operationalizing developmental contextualism. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 325–342). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, N., & Pedersen, A. B. (2008). Dyadic models emerging from the longitudinal structural equation modeling tradition: Parallels with ecological models of interspecifc interactions. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 87–105). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O., Hooker, G., Cao, J., & Campbell, D. (2007). Parameter estimation in ordinary differential equations: A generalized smoothing approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69, 741–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. O., Hooker, G., & Graves, S. (2009). Functional data analysis with R and Matlab. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology Vol. 1: History, theory and methods (4th ed., pp. 237–294). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. (1994). Developmental systems and family functioning. In R. D. Parke & S. G. Kellman (Eds.), Exploring family relationships with other social contexts. (pp. 199–214). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbarra, D. A., & Ferrer, E. (2006). The structure and process of emotional experience following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Dynamic factor analyses of love, anger, and sadness. Emotion , 6, 224–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneirla, T. C. (1957). The concept of development in comparative psychology. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 78–108). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiyko, M. P., & Ram, N. (2011). Conceptualizing and estimating process speed in studies employing ecological momentary assessment designs: A multilevel variance decomposition approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 875–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, R. H., & Stoffer, D. S. (2006). Time series analysis and its applications: With R examples (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, B., & Dixon, T. (2008). Mutualism: Ants and their insect partners. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J. S., & Ferrer, E. (2011). Latent differential equation modeling of self-regulatory and coregulatory affective process. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 956–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J. S., Ferrer, E. & Nesselroade, J.R. (in press). An idiographic approach to estimating models of dyadic interactions with differential equations. Psychometrika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A., Shiffman, S., Atienza, A. A., & Nebeling, L. (2007). The Science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, X., Shiyko, M. P., Li, R., Li, Y., & Dierker, L. (2011). Intensive longitudinal data and the time-varying effects model. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563–633). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(1), 1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16, 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105(4), 634–677. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.634-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 118, 558–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbel, J., & Walter, M. H. (2002). Changing views of work and family roles: A symbiotic perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J. F. (1991). Relations between method and theory in developmental research: A partial-isomophism view. In P. Van Geert & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 91–138). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yieh, K., Tsai, Y.-F., & Kuo, C.-Y. (2004). An exploratory study of “parasites” in Taiwan. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 527–539.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support provided by the National Institute of Health (Grants RC1-AG035645, R21-AG032379, R21-AG033109, R03-CA171809) and the Penn State Social Science Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilam Ram PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ram, N., Shiyko, M., Lunkenheimer, E., Doerksen, S., Conroy, D. (2014). Families as Coordinated Symbiotic Systems: Making use of Nonlinear Dynamic Models. In: McHale, S., Amato, P., Booth, A. (eds) Emerging Methods in Family Research. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics