Abstract
The uniformly charged sphere stabilization method has been used to calculate the lowest 1 S resonances of H −. It was shown that this method is sensitive to the choice of basis set and parameters of the stabilization potential. The conclusion on the suitability of this method for calculating resonance energies and widths is based on the analysis of our computational results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Nicolaides CA (2010) Theory and state-specific methods for the analysis and computation of field-free and field-induced unstable states in atoms and molecules. In: Nicolaides CA, Brändas E (eds) Unstable states in the continuous spectra, Part I: analysis, concepts, methods, and results. Advances in quantum chemistry, vol 60. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 163–267, and references therein
Moiseyev N (2011) Non-Hermitian quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nicolaides CA, Brändas E (eds) (2012) Unstable states in the continuous spectra, Part II: interpretation, theory and applications. Advances in quantum chemistry, vol 63. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Sabelli NH, Gislason EA (1984) SCF study of the lowest \(^{2}\varSigma_{u}^{+}\) resonance of \({H}_{2}^{-}\). J Chem Phys 81:4002–4007
DeRose E, Gislason EA, Sabelli NH (1985) A new method for computing properties of negative ion resonances with application to \(^{2}\varSigma_{u}^{+}\) states of \(H_{2}^{-}\). J Chem Phys 82:4577–4584
Chao JS-Y, Falcetta MF, Jordan KD (1990) Application of the stabilization method to the \({N}_{2}^{-} (1^{2}\varPi_{g} )\) and Mg −(12 Π) temporary anion states. J Chem Phys 93:1125–1135
Izmaylov AF, Adamson SO, Zaitsevskii A (2004) Multipartitioning many-body perturbation theory calculations on temporary anions: applications to \({N}_{2}^{-}\) and CO −. J Phys B, Atom Mol Phys 37:2321–2329
Izmaylov AF, Shchegoleva LN, Scuseria GE, Zaitsevskii A (2005) Ab initio study of temporary anions of benzene and fluorobenzenes using the multipartitioning many-body perturbation theory. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:3933–3937
Adamson S et al. (2007) Multiscale multiphysics non-empirical approach to calculation of light emission properties of chemically active non-equilibrium plasma: application to Ga-I3 system. J Phys D, Appl Phys 40:3857–3881
Simons J (2008) Molecular anions. J Phys Chem A 112:6401–6511, and references therein
Adamson SO, Deminskii MA et al. (2010) The role of dissociative electron attachment to metal halides in a low pressure glow discharge. Russ J Phys Chem B 4:1–7
Simons J (2011) Theoretical study of negative molecular ions. Annu Rev Phys Chem 62:107–128, and references therein
Watson RE (1958) Analytic Hartree-Fock solutions for \({O}_{2}^{-}\). Phys Rev 111:1108–1110
Liebman JF, Yeager DL, Simons J (1977) A simple approach to predicting resonance levels. Chem Phys Lett 48:227–232
Hazi AU, Taylor HS (1970) Stabilization method of calculating resonance energies: model problem. Phys Rev A 1:1109–1120
Lefebvre R (1985) Box quantization and resonance determination: the multichannel case. J Phys Chem 89:4201–4206
Kukulin VI, Krasnopolsky VM, Horác̆ek J (1989) Resonances in atomic physics. In: Kukulin VI, Krasnopolsky VM, Horác̆ek J (eds) Theory of resonances. Principles and applications. Academia, Praha, pp 303–340, and references therein
Adamson S, Kharlampidi D, Dementiev A (2008) Stabilization of resonance states by an asymptotic Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 128:024101, and references therein
Kharlampidi DD, Dementiev AI, Adamson SO (2010) Using of stabilization by uniformly charged sphere for resonance states calculations. Russ J Phys Chem A 84:611–616
Adamson SO, Kharlampidi DD, Dement’ev AI (2011) Calculation of the parameters of resonance states using stabilization with non-Coulomb potentials. Russ J Phys Chem B 5:915–920
Jolicard G, Austin E (1986) Optical potential method of calculating resonance energies and widths. Chem Phys 103:295–302
Jolicard G, Leforestier C, Austin E (1988) Resonance states using the optical potential model. Study of Feshbach resonances and broad shape resonances. J Chem Phys 88:1026–1031
Callaway J (1978) The variational method in atomic scattering. Phys Rep 45:89–173, and references therein
Ho YK (1981) Complex-coordinate calculations for doubly excited states of two-electron atoms. Phys Rev A 23:2137–2149
Pathak A, Kingston AE, Berrington KA (1988) Resonances in H − associated with the n=2,3 and 4 hydrogenic thresholds. J Phys B, At Mol Opt Phys 21:2939–2951
Scholz T, Scott P, Burke PG (1988) Electron-hydrogen-atom scattering at intermediate energies. J Phys B, Atom Mol Phys 21:L139–LI45
Ho YK (1990) High-lying doubly excited states of H −. J Phys B, At Mol Opt Phys 23:L71–L78
Botero J, Shertzer J (1992) Direct numerical solution of the Schrodinger equation for quantum scattering problems. Phys Rev A 46:R1155–R1158
Sadeghpour HR (1992) Resonant electron-hydrogen atom scattering using hyperspherical coordinate method. J Phys B, At Mol Opt Phys 25:L29–L35
Shertzer J, Botero J (1994) Finite-element analysis of electron-hydrogen scattering. Phys Rev A 49:3673–3679
Gien TT (1998) Observation of a triplet D-wave resonance below the n=2 H excitation threshold in electron-hydrogen scattering. J Phys B, At Mol Opt Phys 31:L629–L635
Gien TT (1998) Feshbach resonances below the n=2 H excitation threshold in electron—hydrogen scattering. J Phys B, At Mol Opt Phys 31:L1001–L1008
Bylicki M, Nicolaides C (2000) Theoretical resolution of the H − resonance spectrum up to the n=4 threshold. II. States of 1 S and 1 D symmetries. Phys Rev A 61:052509
Zhang SB, Wang JG, Janev RK (2010) Electronhydrogen-atom elastic and inelastic scattering with screened Coulomb interaction around the n=2 excitation threshold. Phys Rev A 81:032707
Warner CD, King GC, Hammond P, Slevin J (1986) Resonance structure in elastic scattering of electrons from atomic hydrogen. J Phys B, At Mol Opt Phys 19:3297–3308
Burke PG, Taylor AJ (1966) Correlation in the elastic and inelastic S-wave scattering of electrons by H and He+. Proc Phys Soc Lond 88:549–562
Burke PG, Seaton MJ (1971) In: Alder B, Frenbach S, Rotenberg M (eds) Methods in computational physics. Atomic and molecular scattering, vol 10. Academic Press, New York. Chap. 1, and references therein
Harris FE, Michels HH (1971) In: Alder B, Frenbach S, Rotenberg M (eds) Methods in computational physics. Atomic and molecular scattering, vol 10. Academic Press, New York. Chap. 4, and references therein
Matese JJ, Oberoi RS (1971) Choosing pseudostates in the close-coupling formalism for electron-atomic-hydrogen system. Phys Rev A 4:569–579
Abramowitz M, Stegun I (eds) (1964) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. NBS app math series, vol 55. Government Printing Office, Washington
Bateman H, Erdlyi A (1953) Higher transcendental functions, vols 1, 2. McGraw-Hill, New-York
O-ohata K, Taketa H, Huzinaga S (1966) Gaussian expansions of atomic orbitals. J Phys Soc Jpn 21:2306–2313
Hehre WJ, Ditchfield R, Stewart RF, Pople JA (1970) Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. IV. Use of Gaussian expansions of Slater-type orbitals. Extension to second-row molecules. J Chem Phys 52:2769–2773
Widmark P-O, Persson BJ, Roos BO (1991) Density matrix averaged atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets for correlated molecular wave functions. Theor Chim Acta 79:419–432
Sadlej AJ (1992) Medium-size polarized basis sets for high-level-correlated calculations of molecular electric properties. Theor Chim Acta 81:339–354
Wallis A, McElwain DLS, Pritchard HO (1969) The variation method and the algebraic eigenvalue problem. Int J Quant Chem 3:711–722
Moncrieff D, Wilson S (2005) Computational linear dependence in molecular electronic structure calculations using universal basis sets. Int J Quant Chem 101:363–371, and references therein
Yoshida T (1995) Computation of Kummer functions U(a,b,x) for large argument x by using the τ-method. Inf Process Soc Jpn 36:2335–2342
Temme NM (1983) The numerical computation of the confluent hypergeometric function U(a,b,z). Numer Math 41:63–82
Maier CH, Cederbaum LS (1980) A spherical-box approach to resonances. J Phys B, Atom Mol Phys 13:L119–L124
Gersbacher R, Broad JT (1990) Resonances in helium photoionisation. J Phys B 23:365–384
Guseinov II, Mamedov BA (2004) Evaluation of incomplete Gamma functions using downward recursion and analytical relations. J Math Chem 36:341–346
Eyring H, Walter J, Kimball GE (1944) Quantum chemistry. Wiley, New York
Holøien E, Midtdal J (1955) On a metastable energy state of the negative helium ion. Proc Phys Soc A 68:815–823
Condon EU, Shortley GH (1959) The theory of atomic spectra, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schwartz C (1962) Importance of angular correlations between atomic electrons. Phys Rev 126:1015–1019
Goldman SP (1997) Accurate modified configuration interaction calculations for many electron systems made easy. Phys Rev Lett 78:2325–2328, and references therein
Acknowledgements
The study has been carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 12-03-00821.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Calculation of Matrix Elements for One- and Two-Electron Operators
Appendix: Calculation of Matrix Elements for One- and Two-Electron Operators
The matrix elements of the one-electron operators can be written as
where \(Q_{n'l'nl}^{m}(x)\) is the auxiliary integral
For the calculation of integrals (5.18)–(5.20) the method based on the recurrence relation for product of Laguerre polynomials has been used [51]. The main relation of this method can be obtained by substituting the recursion \((n+1)L_{n+1}^{k}(z)-(2n+k+1-z)L_{n}^{k}(z)+(n+k)L_{n-1}^{k}(z)=0\) [40] for \(L_{n}^{2l+2}\) or \(L_{n'}^{2l'+2}\) polynomial in (5.21) which gives two different three-term recursions for integrals over the indexes n and n′. Elimination of the integral \(Q_{n'l'nl}^{m+1}(x)\) from the both recursions leads to the new relation
This relation is applied for construction of the ascending recursion which starts from the elements \(Q_{kl0l}^{m}(x)\) with n′−n+1≤k≤n′+n−1 and finishes at \(Q_{n'lnl}^{m}(x)\) (assume that n≤n′). The integrals with m=2l+2 and x=0 can be evaluated directly using the orthogonality relation
For integrals with m<2l+2 and x=0 the recursion (5.22) is initialized by the elements
All elements \(Q_{kl0l}^{m}(0)\) needed for the evaluation of integrals (5.18) and (5.19) are calculated by means of the special three-term recursion \((n'+1)Q_{n'+1l0l}^{m}(x)-(2n'+2l+1)Q_{n'l0l}^{m}(x)+(2n'+2l+1)Q_{n'l0l}^{m+1}(x) +(n'+2l+2)Q_{n'-1l0l}^{m}(x)=0\).
The case of the integrals (5.20) is more complicate. The elements \(Q_{n'l0l}^{m}(x)\) and \(Q_{n'l1l}^{m}(x)\) (m=2l+2 or m=2l+1) needed for the initializing (5.21) can be taken analytically
where \(\varGamma(a,x)=\int_{x}^{\infty}z^{a-1}\mathrm{e}^{-z}dz\)—incomplete gamma function, W t (n′,l,n,l)—coefficient of the term z t in the product of two associated Laguerre polynomials. This coefficient is calculated by the formula
In this formula v=2l+2 and v′=2l′+2. The function Γ(a,x) from expression (5.27) can be derived analytically at the integer values of parameter a. For this purpose the function is represented as the product Γ(a,x)=e−x x a g(a,x), where g(a,x)—the auxiliary function defined for the a=1 as g(1,x)=1/x. This representation allows to use the standard recurrence relation for incomplete gamma function Γ(a+1,x)=aΓ(a,x)+e−x x a by \(g(a+1,x)=\frac{a}{x}g(a,x)+\frac{1}{x}\) with the minimal numerical error [52]. The analytical method of calculation is suitable for integrals with n′≤23, that one can see by the comparison of the values obtained from the formula (5.27) with ones obtained by Gauss-Laguerre integration. For the integrals with n′>23 the quadrature method was applied.
During the calculation of electron-electron repulsion integrals the operator 1/r 12 can be represented by the series
where r <=min(r 1,r 2) and r >=max(r 1,r 2) [53–57]. With this expression the two-electron integral is
where R L —radial integral in the form
in which variables r 1, r 2 and r </> are replaced by x, y and x </>, and \(f_{i}(x)=\mathrm{e}^{-x}x^{l'_{i}+l_{i}+2}L_{n'_{i}}^{2l'_{i}+2}(x)L_{n_{i}}^{2l_{i}+2}(x)\) (i=1,2). The multiplier D LM from the formula (5.30) is
where \(C^{lm}_{l_{1}m_{1},l_{2}m_{2}}\)—Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
Substitution x </> by x and y the integral (5.31) can be represented as
where the integration over variables x,y is realized on the region [0,∞); integrals from the right part correspond to x>y and x<y cases, respectively. As the integration order in this relation is arbitrary, each of integrals from the right part can be taken in two variants [53–57]. For the first integral there is the expression
The second integral from the right part of (5.33) can be obtained from (5.34) by substitution f 2 for f 1 (and vice versa). Using the expressions with the internal integration over the interval x≤y≤∞, the integrals from (5.33) can be modified as
The expansion of Laguerre polynomials from (5.35) over powers of variables x and y permits to present R L as
where \(\alpha=l'_{1}+l_{1}+L+2\), \(\beta=l'_{2}+l_{2}+L+2\), γ=2L+1 and H a,b —integral in the form
By means the integral \(\int_{0}^{\infty}x^{a}\mathrm{e}^{-x}\gamma(b+1,x)\mathrm{d}x=\frac {\varGamma(a+b+2)}{(b+1)2^{a+b+2}}{}_{2}F_{1}(1,a+b+2,b+2;1/2)=H_{b,a}\) it can be shown that H a,b =Γ(a+1)Γ(b+1)−H b,a and H a,a =(Γ(a+1))2/2. Putting the recurrence relation Γ(b+1,x)=bΓ(b,x)+x be−x into integral (5.37), one obtains
To evaluate the H a,b it is useful to introduce the new formula \(h_{a,b}=H_{a,b}\frac{2^{a+b+1}}{\varGamma(a+b+1)}\) (h 0,0=1), which allows to rewrite recursion (5.38) as \(h_{a,b}=\frac{2b}{a+b}h_{a,b-1}+1\).
The numerical tests demonstrated, that the evaluation of the radial integral by formulas (5.36)–(5.38) gives the accuracy up to 12th significant digits for the basis functions with \(\max(n'_{1} ,n_{1} ,n'_{2} ,n_{2}) \le7\), if the 64th bits representation of real numbers is used. The 128th bit representation allows to preserve the same accuracy level for the basis functions with \(\max(n'_{1} ,n_{1} ,n'_{2} ,n_{2}) \le10\). The check of the two-indexes recursion, which is analogous to the (5.22) [51], showed that this one provides a good precision only for integrals with \(\max (n'_{1},n_{1},n'_{2},n_{2}) \le13\) when 128th bit representation of real numbers is used. This is in accord with the remark in [51] about the possibility of using this recursion for integral calculation with a good accuracy \(\max(n'_{1},n_{1},n'_{2},n_{2}) \le14\). As it was not known beforehand if in constructing a wave function one can select polynomials with n≤13 only, the combined scheme was used. Calculations have been done with the formulas (5.36)–(5.38), if \(\max(n'_{1},n_{1},n'_{2},n_{2}) < 11\) and the quadrature integration being used in the opposite case. Using the replacement of u=x and v=y−x, similar to [57], the integral (5.35) can be represented as
Thus, it is possible to use Gauss-Laguerre integration for calculation (5.39). Note, that the relation as \(\sum_{m=0}^{n}L_{m}^{\alpha}(x)L_{n-m}^{\beta}(y)=L_{n}^{\alpha+\beta +1}(x+y)\) [41] allows to factorize the two-dimensional integral completely.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Adamson, S.O., Kharlampidi, D.D., Dementiev, A.I. (2013). Application of the Uniformly Charged Sphere Stabilization for Calculating the Lowest 1 S Resonances of H − . In: Hotokka, M., Brändas, E., Maruani, J., Delgado-Barrio, G. (eds) Advances in Quantum Methods and Applications in Chemistry, Physics, and Biology. Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01529-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01529-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01528-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01529-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)