A Comment on the Question of Degeneracies in Quantum Mechanics

  • Michal SvrčekEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics book series (PTCP, volume 27)


The problem of degeneracies, descending from the Born-Oppenheimer (B-O) approximation serves as a “comeback backdoor” of the principle of complementarity, but on a much more subtle level. Quantum mechanics incorporates both mechanical and field theory features, which results in the well-known particle-wave aspects of complementarity. The degeneracy problem, however, prompts a new type of “property-object” complementary phenomena. This leads to serious consequences: Field theoretical methods, unlike mechanical ones, are incapable of separating the internal and the external degrees of freedom with respect to the centre of gravity, but on the other hand adapt relativistically in a natural manner very similar to the space-time formulas of Maxwell’s equations. The solutions of the quantum field equations, relativistic in the mentioned specific sense, yield singularities at symmetric points that correspond to the well-known B-O degeneracies giving the latter in actual fact a metaphysical attribute. However, Nature has in this case a more sophisticated method or modus operandi to avoid degenerations and to instigate symmetry violations.


Quantum Mechanic Translational Symmetry Degenerate State External Degree Field Theoretical Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author wishes to express his gratitude to E. Brändas for a very careful reading of the manuscript and improvements of many linguistic and stylistic formulations.


  1. 1.
    Born M, Oppenheimer R (1927) Ann Phys (Leipzig) 84:457 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jahn HA, Teller E (1937) Proc R Soc London A 161:220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Köppel H, Domcke W, Cederbaum LS (1984) Adv Chem Phys 57:59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bersuker IB (2006) The Jahn-Teller effect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogoliubov NN (1958) Nuovo Cim 10 Ser 7:794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR (1957) Phys Rev 108:1175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monkhorst HJ (1987) Phys Rev A 36:1544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cafiero M, Adamowicz L (2004) Chem Phys Lett 387:136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Born M, Huang K (1954) The dynamical theory of crystal lattices. Oxford University Press, London Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Handy NC, Lee AM (1996) Chem Phys Lett 252:425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kutzelnigg W (1997) Mol Phys 90:909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fröhlich H (1950) Phys Rev 79:845 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fröhlich H (1952) Proc R Soc Lond A 215:291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svrček M, Baňacký P, Biskupič S, Noga J, Pelikán P, Zajac A (1999) Chem Phys Lett 299:151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Svrček M (2012) In: Progress in theoretical chemistry and physics, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, pp 511–552. Part 7 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Svrček M (2012). arXiv:1207.0711 [physics.gen-ph]
  17. 17.
    Svrček M (1992) In: Molecular vibrations. Methods in computational chemistry, vol 4. Plenum, New York, pp 150–202 (Chap 2-6.2) & pp 204–229 (Chap 7) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brändas E (2009) Frontiers in quantum systems. In: Russo N, Antonchenko VYa, Kryachko E (eds) Chemistry and physics. NATO science for peace and security series A: chemistry and biology, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 49–87 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Mécanique Ondulatoire AppliquéeCMOA Czech BranchCarlsbadCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations