Skip to main content

The Debate Over Social Disparities and the Disparity Discourse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 720 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contributions to Political Science ((CPS))

Abstract

The analysis of spatial disparities has quite a long tradition in human geography and other social sciences; it has been among the major research issues of several disciplines for decades. Browsing the works written by geographers, economists, sociologists, or even experts of political sciences, one can find a great many contributions related to what is called spatial “differentiation”, “disparity”, “inequality”, “injustice” or “unevenness”. In the vast body of literature, however, the exact meaning of these terms, certainly all concerning the inhomogeneity of space and the peculiarity of places, remains unclear, especially as such expressions are often considered as synonymous, either explicitly or implicitly (Hinderink and Sterkenburg 1978). For this reason we find it important to have an overview of the various forms of geographical differences, and to introduce clear terminology first, which we can use in our essay to avoid misunderstandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, this kind of reasoning still exists, even if it has been exiled by now from the domain of science due to changing power geometries in the production of knowledge. After the destructive 2011 earthquake in Japan, Tokyo’s Governor called the disaster a “tembatsu” (divine punishment) for “egoism and populism” tainting Japanese politics and as well as the Japanese people (The Japan Times 2011). US conservative radio host Glenn Beck also interpreted the catastrophe as “a message being sent” by God to follow the Ten Commandments (Hartenstein 2011). Of course it speaks volumes that, unlike would have presumably happened some centuries ago, both persons had to face fierce criticism for their words.

  2. 2.

    It is important to underline a terminological issue at this point for the dualistic meaning of “differentiation” in geographical research. Spatial differentiation is interpreted in our essay as state of unevenness, in line with the approach of Ward (2009a). In the theoretical literature dealing with regionalization, however, spatial differentiation has another meaning. It refers there to the act of “dividing up” space, so of differentiating, distinguishing various parts of the world from each other for analytical or administrative reasons. For the latter use of the term see Entrikin (2011).

  3. 3.

    In countries belonging to the former “Western” and “Eastern” Blocs during the Cold War, the meaning of the term “social and economic disparities” is somewhat different. In the former context, social disparities refer to differences in status and privilege, and to an unequal access to resources. On the contrary, economic disparities embrace the unequal distribution of economy in space through the division of labor and functional differentiation. In post-socialist countries, however, whether one speaks about “social”, “social and economic” or “economic” disparities also has a political relevance and might mirror one’s point concerning issues of the politics of science. This is because in the communist period Marxist-Leninist geography entitled “economic” all issues other than physical (Gyuris and Győri 2013). Such an approach was based on the concept that it was conscious work distinguishing human from animals, which led to an overemphasis of production and the subordination of “society” to “economy”. For the same reason, to keep distance from the Communist system, many researchers began after the post-socialist political shift to argue for defining “social geography” as a “higher category” than “economic geography”, where the latter was claimed only to be a subset of the former (Timár 2006). Although in many cases the hybrid term of “social and economic geography” was to follow Marxist-Leninist “economic geography”, the use of this expression is often exposed to criticism by those firmly rejecting Marxism-Leninism. For such a term is either regarded by them as “logically incorrect” (since, for them, “economic” is a part of “social”), or as the proof of a pseudo-Marxist-Leninist stance (where keeping the adjective “economic” at the same level as “social” reflects an opposition to acknowledging “economy” as subordinate to “society”). In the recent work, we refer to “social and economic disparities” in the Western sense, without any implicit political notions.

  4. 4.

    Although the concept of power itself is also difficult to describe and its definitions in the literature are manifold and highly diverse (for a detailed overview on various notions see Avelino and Rotmans 2009), we use the term here in a broad sense, accepting the definition of Avelino and Rotmans (2009). Their concept is similar to that of Parsons (1963, 1967) to some extent since they define power as the ability of actors to mobilize resources to achieve a certain goal. Differently to Parsons, however, their understanding of resources is rather broad, not only including material resources, but all sorts of human, mental, monetary, artifactual and natural resources.

  5. 5.

    This does not mean that societal systems above a few hundred people cannot come into being at all without a written culture. But the efficiency of communication and, consequently, of coordination here is unavoidably much lower. The number of face-to-face interactions the instructions of the leader need to go through until they can be received by all subordinates dramatically increases, which radically increases the possibility of distortions. (Obviously, the same goes for reactions coming from the subordinates.) Hence, the emergence of a well-organized society and state is not possible without at least a certain fraction of society being literate.

  6. 6.

    It is important to underline that the increase in the division of labor and the complexity of society is barely a balanced process at a permanent pace, but rather a series of rapid shifts with long and relatively “moderate” phases in between. The Neolithic Revolution or the Industrial Revolution, for instance, witnessed a thoroughly rising complexity of society otherwise unprecedented for much longer historical epochs (Meusburger 1998a). Still, although the process is volatile, the continuous increase in the complexity of society is to be regarded as a fact, just as that the amplitude of shifts increases and the duration of moderate periods between these shifts decreases over time.

  7. 7.

    In this work we use the term “social strata” instead of “social class”, which at least in the continental European context usually has a Marxist connotation.

  8. 8.

    Although it is not absolutely zero. One of the few counterexamples was the Treckboers in South Africa. They were descendants of Dutch, German and French Huguenot immigrants, who had been farmers before leaving Europe. In South Africa, however, they were forced by unfavorable climatic conditions in the coastal regions to landlocked areas where their former economic activities were not to sustain any more. Thus, adapting to the aridity of their new land, they shifted to nomadic pastoralism during the eighteenth century (Waibel 1933). In fact, similar changes take place in societies that, after the fall of an empire they belonged to, witness a decline in administration, political uncertainty, and a decreasing complexity of societal structures (e.g. in the former Roman provinces of Britannia and Pannonia after the empire collapsed). Of course, such dramatic changes happen only in exceptional cases under extreme circumstances.

  9. 9.

    Livingstone, actually, focuses on problems which emerge easily while the history of geographical thought is analyzed. From our point of view, however, many of his remarks have relevance for the history of any sorts of thought.

  10. 10.

    In this study, the selection of philosophers mainly focuses on those conventionally regarded in political science, philosophy and history as key thinkers regarding equality and inequality. For this, we have found especially useful the works of Bluhm (2007) in Llanque and Münkler (2007), a broadly-used textbook in the university education of political science and political philosophy. A valuable overview of the history of the concept of equality is also given by Dann (1975) in Brunner et al. (1972). The latter series, which was published again in 2004 without modifications, counts as a much-cited scientific work in the disciplines of history, philosophy and political science.

  11. 11.

    In a remarkable way, growing interest in social disparities did not lead to an increasing attention to spatial inequalities. Although social and spatial disparities are coeval, spatial inequality as a problem was brought into the focus of thinkers more than 2,000 years later than was the case with social disparities. While the debate over social disparities began in ancient Greece, a similarly significant attention was not paid to spatial inequalities until the nineteenth century. Reasons for this are to be discussed in Chap 3.

  12. 12.

    Further criticism is levelled at the concept’s controversies by Karl Popper (1945), who was convinced that Plato’s views would unavoidably lead to tyranny. As Pfetsch (2003) puts it, however, Popper’s critique is also one-sided and tendentious, and a detailed evaluation of his stance does not belong to the aims of the recent work. From our aspect, the main point is that in The Laws Plato was an explicit advocate of social equality instead of disparity, although (or even if) his concept about an ideal state was still not absolutely egalitarian.

  13. 13.

    In this sense, the master and his student had quite similar attitudes regarding real societies under real-world circumstances. Thus, we agree with those researchers who interpret Aristotle as the person continuing and improving the concepts of Plato with a stronger emphasis on real conditions, instead opposing his master (on the debate over the relation of the notions of Aristotle and Plato, see Wiser 1983; Pfetsch 2003).

  14. 14.

    It is worth noting at this point that the United States was a remarkable exception, despite the manifold influence the American philosophical and political tradition exerted on national traditions in Europe concerning the issue of freedom. The 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights, the cornerstone of the newly emerging US legal order, only stated that “all men are by nature equally free and independent” (which was a statement with limited “range”, given that it referred exclusively to white men and in the succeeding decades proved in practice compatible with slavery). Equality is otherwise not mentioned in the bill, neither as equality before the law nor as an equal distribution of properties (Dann 1975).

  15. 15.

    It should be underlined that the philosophical boom in Europe with regard to disparities rather meant the rapid gain of the issue in popularity than the emergence of a brand new topic. Reformation as well as anti-feudal peasants’ revolts had already indicated the importance of the problem, and the slogans propagated by the leaders of Medieval anti-feudal revolts planted the seeds of philosophical debates later on.

  16. 16.

    Landowners, for example, can leave their lands to their children, but employees cannot do the same with their workplace, which is their main source of income.

  17. 17.

    A detailed description of the discourse on equality in Germany from the late eighteenth century on (although with emphases different to those of our paper) is given by Dann (1975). We have to emphasize that neither the democratic idea of political equality nor democratic communities were without predecessors in German speaking territories (for the latter a peculiar example was the Landsgemeinde, an early form of direct democracy in Swiss cantons, and, until the Napoleonic Wars, in the Bregenzerwald Region of Austria). In intellectual debates, however, the topic had attracted little attention until the French Revolution.

  18. 18.

    A more detailed description of the extension of voting rights in various European countries is to be found in Acemoglu and Robinson (2000).

  19. 19.

    On the spatially selective reception of Darwin’s concept and the relevance of the geographical context for which aspects of the Darwinian concept were emphasized or ignored at given places also see Livingstone (2003b, 2006).

  20. 20.

    This does not necessarily mean an absolute lack of inequalities. In Marxist interpretation, certain disparities can exist even within classless societies. Senior members of tribes, for instance, can have more influence on decision-making over the life of tribe due to the respect they enjoy. However, the forces of production are owned by the community, which, in the Marxist approach, means that nobody can be excluded from their use. In consequence, such deep and stable inequalities cannot emerge as those in class societies (see Niedermaier 2009).

  21. 21.

    This is the stance usually described as “social Darwinism” in the literature (Paul 2009). Yet, I do not use this term in the text since this extreme laissez-faire conservatism was basically not rooted in Darwin’s ideas, from which they utilized many slogans. Instead, they could rather be traced back to some concepts of the “neo-Lamarckians” (Paul 2009; cf. Bowler 1990; Hofstadter 1944; Moore 1985). They followed the pre-Darwinian French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in thinking that organisms acquire new characteristics as the result of a process of active adaptation to their environments (Paul 2009). It was their conviction that, as formulated by the British philosopher Herbert Spencer, “the whole effort of nature is to get rid of such [the “unfit”], to clear the world of them, to make room for better” (Spencer 1970[1851], p. 379; cited by Paul 2009, p. 232). The quick spread of this idea was partly thanks to the skyrocketing popularity of Darwin’s works, which, although not “neo-Lamarckian”, opened the way for other evolutionary concepts as well. That is why many superficial observers identified Darwinism with evolutionism (Paul 2009).

  22. 22.

    The following five paragraphs are generally based on a more detailed overview in Marxhausen (2010, pp. 40–45).

  23. 23.

    In contrast to social identity, personal identity is related to “specific attributes of the individual” (Turner 1982, p. 18.). Such attributes can be “competence, bodily attributes, ways of relating to others, psychological characteristics, intellectual concerns, personal tastes” etc. (ibid.).

  24. 24.

    The possible evaluation of “consolidated” and “emerging” discourses is thoroughly different if the question is to what extent they enable one to express one’s own opinion without constraints. This is for at least two reasons. First, since “consolidated” discourses offer prefabricated slogans, newcomers are constrained to use these, although maybe none of these slogans is feasible in exactly grasping one’s point of view. Second, in “consolidated” discourses slogans are so strongly and directly linked to characteristic underlying positions that using a slogan automatically pushes one into a characteristic political category. Thus, articulating sophisticated views and avoiding black-and-white thinking is very difficult or even impossible within these “consolidated” discourses.

  25. 25.

    According to its official website, Captus is an “independent…free-market think tank that promotes the ideas of liberty such as free enterprise, low taxes and individual liberty” (Captus 2011).

References

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2000) Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. Q J Econ 115:1167–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson CA (1968) Education and society. In: Sills DL (ed) International encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol 4. Macmillan, New York, NY, pp 517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H (1961) Between past and future: six exercises in political thought. Viking, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1998) Politics (Translated, with Introduction and Notes, by Reeve CDC). Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (2004) Nicomachean ethics (Translated and Edited by Crisp R). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann J (2000) Herrschaft und Heil. Politische Theologie in Altägypten, Israel und Europa [rule and salvation. Political theology in ancient Egypt, Israel and Europe]. Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Avelino F, Rotmans J (2009) Power in transition. An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory 12:543–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Babeuf G (1796) Manifesto of the equals (trans: Abidor M). Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/history/france/revolution/conspiracy-equals/1796/manifesto.htm

  • Badiou A (2010) The communist hypothesis. Verso, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes TJ (2004) Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Prog Hum Geogr 28:565–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer HH (1992) Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2010). Cameron announces audit of ‘crazy’ Labour spending. Retrieved 14 May 2011, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8685125.stm

  • Berreman GD (2001) Inequality: comparative aspects. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 7377–7382

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass T (vol ed) (2000) Obedience to authority: current perspectives on the milgram paradigm. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluhm H (2007) Freiheit und Gleichheit [Freedom and equality]. In: Llanque M, Münkler H (eds) Politische theorie und ideengeschichte [Political theory and philosophy]. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 372–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm C (1997) Impact of the human egalitarian syndrome on Darwinian selection mechanics. Am Nat 150(Suppl):100–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman J (1996) Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolte KM (1979) Leistung und Leistungsprinzip. Zur Konzeption, Wirklichkeit und Möglichkeit eines gesellschaftlichen Gestaltungsprinzips [Achievement and the achievement principle. To the concept, reality and possibility of a formal principle of society]. Leske und Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason. On the theory of action. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2004) Science of science and reflexivity (trans: Nice R). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P, Passeron JC (1990) Reproduction in education, society and culture (translated from the French by Nice R). SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler PJ (1990) Charles Darwin: the man and his influence. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand U, Sekler N (2009) Postneoliberalism: catch-all word or valuable analytical and political concept? – Aims of a beginning debate. Dev Dialogue 51:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell G (1986) Coping with threatened identities. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell G (2004) Identity change in the context of the growing influence of European Union institutions. In: Herrmann RK, Risse T, Brewer MB (eds) Transnational identities. Becoming European in the EU. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Brie M (2009) Ways out of the crisis of neoliberalism. Dev Dialogue 51:15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg A, Morrow GD, Pfeiffer D (2007) Editorial note: why spatial justice? Crit Plan 14:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner O, Conze W, Koselleck R (eds) (1972–1997) Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland [Key concepts in history. A historical dictionary of political and social language in Germany], 7 vols. Ernst Klett, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt J (1860) Die Cultur der Renaissance in Italien [The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy]. Schweighauser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke E (1910[1790]) Reflections on the French revolution. J. M. Dent & Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (2002) The hand of Cicero. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron D (2009) The big society. Retrieved 12 Apr 2011, from http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/11/David_Cameron_The_Big_Society.aspx

  • Captus (2011) Captus in English. Retrieved 31 May 2011, from http://www.captus.nu/english.shtml

  • Castel R (1994) “Problematization” as a mode of reading history. In: Goldstein J (ed) Foucault and the writing of history. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp 237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochou X (1996) How group membership is formed: self categorization or group beliefs? The construction of European identity in France and Greece. In: Breakwell G, Lyons E (vol eds) Changing European identities: social psychological analyses of social change. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, p 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini RB (2008) Turning persuasion from an art into a science. In: Meusburger P, Welker M, Wunder E (eds) Knowledge and space, vol 1, Clashes of knowledge. Orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 199–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero (1999) On the commonwealth and on the laws. In: Zetzel EG (ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, Sabine GH (1929) On the commonwealth. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins R (1988) Theoretical sociology. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover PJ, Searing DD, Crewe IM (2002) The deliberative potential of political discussion. Br J Polit Sci 32:21–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Csányi V (2003) Az emberi természet. Humánetológia [Human nature. Human ethology]. Vince, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis P (2010) Spin doctor Andy Coulson earns more than Nick Clegg. guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 14 May 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jun/10/spin-doctor-andy-coulson

  • Dahl R (1989) Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann O (1975) Gleichheit [equality]. In: Brunner O, Conze W, Koselleck R (eds) Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Band 2 [Key concepts in history. A historical dictionary of political and social language in Germany]. Ernst Klett, Stuttgart, pp 997–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, 2 vols. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies B (1968) Social needs and resources in local services. Michael Joseph, London

    Google Scholar 

  • de Condorcet M (1796[1795]) Outlines of an historical view of the progress of the human Mind. Lang and Ustick, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A (2003) Health, inequality, and economic development. J Econ Lit 41:113–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis R (1987) Faith in the city? (Review article.). J Hist Geogr 13:310–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Devichand M (2010) The spirit level: Britain’s new theory of everything? BBC News. Retrieved 12 Apr 2011, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11518509

  • Dryzek JS, Honig B, Phillips A (eds) (2006) The Oxford handbook of political theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil G, Lévy D (2011) The crisis of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels F (1976[1878]) Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring’s revolution in science. Foreign Languages Press, Peking

    Google Scholar 

  • Entrikin JN (2011) Region and regionalism. In: Agnew JA, Livingstone DN (eds) The SAGE handbook of geographical knowledge. SAGE, London, pp 344–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans RJ (1997) In search of German social Darwinism: the history and historiography of a concept. In: Berg M, Cocks G (eds) Medicine and modernity: public health and medical care in 19th and 20th-century Germany. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassmann H, Meusburger P (1997) Arbeitsmarktgeographie [Geography of labor market]. Teubner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny D, Berkes F, McCay BJ, Acheson JM (1990) The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Hum Ecol 18:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P (1993[1975]) Against method, 3rd edn. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte JG (1806) Die Grundzüge des gegenwärtigen Zeitalters [Characteristics of the present age]. Verlag der Realschulbuchhandlung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1981) The order of discourse (inaugural lecture at the Collège de France, given 2 December 1970) (trans: McLeod I). In: Young R (ed) Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, pp 51–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1994) Dits es écrits: 1954–1988, vol 4, 1980–1988. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (1992) Rethinking the public sphere. In: Calhoun C (ed) Habermas and the public sphere. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 109–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2000) Rethinking recognition. New Left Rev 3:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm E (1942) The fear of freedom. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaus GF, Kukathas C (eds) (2004) Handbook of political theory. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerz HJ (1989) Thomas Müntzer. Mystiker, apokaliptiker, revolutionär [Thomas Müntzer. Mystic, apocalyptist and revolutionary]. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe JH (2010) Analysing social inequality: a critique of two recent contributions from economics and epidemiology. Eur Sociol Rev 26:731–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe JH, McKnight A (2006) The economic basis of social class. In: Morgan S, Grusky DB, Fields GS (eds) Mobility and inequality: frontiers of research from sociology and economics. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HS (1954) The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62:124–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyuris F, Győri R (2013) Sovietized science at the service of “socialist national economy”. The example of Hungarian geography, 1945–1960. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley L (2009). The way we live now. The Guardian. Retrieved 27 May 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/mar/13/the-spirit-level

  • Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud 14:575–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington J (1656) Oceana. John Streater, London. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2801/2801-h/2801-h.htm

  • Hartenstein M (2011) Glenn Beck: Japan earthquake could be ‘message’ from God to follow the Ten Commandments. NY Daily News. Retrieved 16 Apr 2012, from http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/glenn-beck-japan-earthquake-message-god-follow-ten-commandments-article-1.117860#ixzz1GcmjUU9H

  • Hattersley R (2009) Last among equals. New statesman. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2009/03/spirit-level-wilkinson-pickett

  • Helm T, Hope C (2008) The top twelve think tanks in Britain. The telegraph. Retrieved 14 May 2011, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/1576447/The-top-twelve-think-tanks-in-Britain.html

  • Hinderink J, Sterkenburg JJ (1978) Spatial inequality in underdeveloped countries and the role of government policy. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 69:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw VG (1970) Einstein’s social philosophy. In: Schilpp PA (ed) Albert Einstein. Philosopher-scientist, vol VII, Library of living philosophers. MJF Books, New York, NY, pp 647–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1929[1651]) Hobbes’s Leviathan. Clarendon Press, Oxford (Original title: Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1987[1642]) De Cive. The English version. In: Warrender H (ed). Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter R (1944) Social Darwinism in American thought. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Jensen A (2009) Geography. History and concepts: a student’s guide, 4th edn. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton W (2009) Look no further than inequality for the source of all our ills. The observer. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/15/equality-economy-will-hutton

  • Huxley TT (1888) The struggle for existence in human society. In: Huxley TT (ed) Collected essays, vol IX, Evolution & ethics and other essays. John Murray, London, pp 195–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1786) Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte [Conjectural beginning of human history]. Berlinische Monatsschrift 7:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J (2009) The spirit level. Financial times. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/77b1bd26-14db-11de-8cd1-0000779fd2ac.html

  • Kay J (2011) Biographical note. Retrieved 3 June 2011, from http://www.johnkay.com/about/john-kay-biographical-note

  • Kirk R (1953) The conservative mind: from Burke to Santayna. Henry Regnery Publishing, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Johnson J (1997) What sort of equality does deliberative democracy require? In: Bohman J, Rehg W (eds) Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 279–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrád G, Szelényi I (1978) Die Intelligenz auf dem Weg zur Klassenmacht [The intelligentsia on the way to class power] (trans: Paetzke HH). Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin P (1939[1902]) Mutual aid. A factor of evolution. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn H (1968) Plato. In: Maier H (ed) Klassiker des Politischen Denkens 1. Von Plato bis Hobbes [Classics of political thought 1. From Plato to Hobbes]. Beck, München, pp 15–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan L (1988) The demise of the demarcation problem. In: Ruse M (ed) But is it science? Prometheus, Buffalo, NY, pp 337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld PF (1939) The change of opinion during a political discussion. J Appl Psychol 23:131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin VI (1961[1902]) What is to be done? In: Lenin’s collected works, vol 5. Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, p 347–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin VI (2004[1917]) The state and revolution. Kessinger, Whitefish, MT

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot KG (1993) Long-term developments in complex hunter-gatherer societies: recent perspectives from the Pacific Coast of North America. J Archaeol Res 1:167–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DN (1979) Some methodological problems in the history of geographical thought. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 70:226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DN (2003a) Putting science in its place: geographies of scientific knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DN (2003b) Re-placing Darwinism and Christianity. In: Lindberg DC, Numbers RL (eds) When science and Christianity meet. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DN (2006) The geography of Darwinism. Interdiscip Sci Rev 31:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DN (2009) Science/science studies. In: Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, Watts M, Whatmore S (eds) The dictionary of human geography, 5th edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 666–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Llanque M, Münkler H (eds) (2007) Politische theorie und ideengeschichte [Political theory and philosophy]. Akademie Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd WF (1968[1837]) Lectures on population, value, poor-laws, and rent, delivered in the University of Oxford during the years 1832, 1833, 1834, 1835 & 1836. Kelley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock FP (2006) Edmund Burke. Volume II: 1784–1797. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1988[1689]) Two treatises of government. In: Geuss R, Skinner Q (Series eds), Laslett P (ed) Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 137–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie [Social systems. Outlines of a general theory]. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The society of society], 2 vols. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Macek J (1988) Michael Gaismair. Vergessener Held des Tiroler Bauernkriegs [Michael Gaismair. Forgotten Hero of the Peasants’ Revolt in Tirol]. Österreichischer Bundesverlag, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse H (2007[1964]) One-dimensional man. Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot M (2004) Status syndrome. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (2009[1875]) Critique of the Gotha programme. Dodo Press, Gloucester

    Google Scholar 

  • Marxhausen C (2010) Identität – repräsentation – diskurs. Eine handlungsorientierte linguistische Diskursanalyse zur Erfassung raumbezogener Identitätsangebote [Identity – representation – discourse. An action-oriented linguistic discourse analysis to comprehend space-related identities]. Franz Steiner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer D (1984) Unmasking technocratic geography. In: Billinge M, Gregory D, Martin R (eds) Recollections of a revolution: geography as spatial science. Macmillan, London, pp 153–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger P (1998a) Bildungsgeographie. Wissen und Ausbildung in der räumlichen dimension [Geography of education. Knowledge and education in the spatial dimension]. Spektrum, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger P (1998b) Räumliche Disparitäten des Wissens als Strukturmerkmal der Wirtschaft. Zu einigen Defiziten der neoklassischen Wirtschaftstheorien [Spatial disparities of knowledge as structural feature of economy. To some shortcomings of neo-classical economic theories]. In: Universitäts-Gesellschaft H (ed) Heidelberger Jahrbücher 42. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger P (2000) The spatial concentration of knowledge. Some theoretical considerations. Erdkunde 54:352–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger P (2005) Sachwissen und Orientierungswissen als Machtinstrument und Konfliktfeld. Zur Bedeutung von Worten, Bildern und Orten bei der Manipulation des Wissens“ [Factual and orientation knowledge (Orientierungswissen) as instruments of power and fields of conflict. On the significance of words, images and places in the manipulation of knowledge]. Geogr Z 93:148–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger P (2008) The nexus of knowledge and space. In: Meusburger P, Welker M, Wunder E (eds) Knowledge and space, vol 1, Clashes of knowledge. Orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills CW (1956) The power elite. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton J (1915[1660]) The ready and easy way to establish a free commonwealth (Edited with Introduction, Notes, and Glossary by Clark EM). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu (1989[1752]). The spirit of the laws. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophical thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JR (1985) Herbert Spencer’s henchmen: the evolution of protestant liberals in late nineteenth-century America. In: Durant J (ed) Darwinism and divinity: essays on evolution and religious belief. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 76–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore C (2010) Inequality is not a social illness to be ‘cured’. The telegraph. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/charlesmoore/7193991/Inequality-is-not-a-social-illness-to-be-cured.html

  • Morrill R (2001) Spatial equity. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 14789–14792

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1986) The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1991) Equality and partiality. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedermaier H (2009) Marxistische theorie [Marxist theory]. In: Kneer G, Schroer M (eds) Handbuch soziologische theorien [Handbook of sociological theories]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (2002[1886]) Beyond good and evil. Prelude to a philosophy of the future (Horstmann RP, Norman J (eds), trans: Norman J). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (2007[1878]) Human, all too human (trans: Hollingdale RJ, with an introduction by Schacht R). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (1999[1974]) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS (2009) UK output, income and expenditure. 3rd quarter 2009. Stat Bull. Retrieved 27 June 2011, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/oie1109.pdf

  • ONS (2011) Government deficit and debt under the Maastricht Treaty. Stat Bull. Retrieved 27 June 2011, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/maast0311.pdf

  • Osberg L (2001) Inequality. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 7371–7377

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1963) On the concept of political power. Proc Am Philos Soc 107:232–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1967) On the concept of political power: sociological theory and modern society. Free Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul DB (2009) Darwin, social Darwinism and eugenics. In: Hodge J, Radick G (eds) The Cambridge companion to Darwin, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 219–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch FR (2003) Theoretiker der Politik. Von Platon bis Habermas [Theoreticians of politics. From Plato to Habermas]. Wilhelm Fink, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie GH (1983) On spatial justice. Environ Plan A 15:465–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1961) The laws. Volume 1, Books I–VI (trans: Bury RG). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1945) The open society and its enemies, 2 vols. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaflaub KA (2005) From protection and defense to offense and participation: stages in the conflict of the orders. In: Raaflaub KA (ed) Social struggles in Archaic Rome. New perspectives on the conflict of the orders. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 185–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow P, Rose NS (2003) Foucault today. In: Rabinow P, Rose NS (eds) The essential foucault. Selections from essential works of foucault, 1954–1984. New Press, New York, NY, pp vii–xxxv

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1997) The idea of public reason. In: Bohman J, Rehg W (eds) Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (2005[1971]) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves R (2009) In search of the truth about equality in Britain. The Observer. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/apr/05/spirit-level-richard-wilkinson

  • Reeves R (2011) Full biography: speakers for business. Retrieved 14 May 2011, from http://www.sfb.co.uk/speakers/richard_reeves/longbio

  • Reynaud A (1981) Société, espace et justice: inégalités régionales et justice socio-spatiale [Society, space and justice: regional inequalities and socio-spatial justice]. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeck B (2001) Renaissance. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13155–13160

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N, Valverde N (1998) Governed by law? Soc Leg Stud 7:541–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau JJ (1754) Discourse on inequality (trans: Cole GDH). Digireads

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau JJ (2002[1762]) The social contract and the first and second discourses (Edited and with an Introduction by Dunn S). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins MD (1968) Tribesmen. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanandaji N, Sanandaji T, Malm A, Snowdon C (2010) Un-level ground. Wall Street J. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB127862421912914915.html

  • Sargent M (2009) Why inequality is fatal. Nature 458:1109–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders P (2010) Beware false prophets. Equality, the good society and the spirit level. In: Natalie Evans (ed). Policy Exchange, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer M (1980) Socialism and the legitimation of inequality. J Sociol 16:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling H (2001) Reformation and confessionalization. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 12891–12895

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel F (1966[1796]) Versuch über den Begriff des Republikanismus [Essay on the Concept of Republicanism]. Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe. Erste Abteilung, Band 7. Schöningh, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D (2004) Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environ Polit 13:517–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt C (2008[1928]) Constitutional theory (translated and edited by Seitzer J, foreword by Kennedy E). Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner K (2001) Feudalism. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 5608–5616

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz RD (2001) Natural law. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 10388–10392

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (1955) The fishery: the objectives of sole ownership. J Polit Econ 63:116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S (1998) Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Trans Inst Br Geogr (New Ser) 23:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair M (2010) Time to get level. Prospect Magazine. Retrieved 15 May 2011, from http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2010/07/the-problem-with-the-spirit-level

  • Smith DM, Lee R (eds) (2004) Geographies and moralities. International perspectives on development, justice and space. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon C (2010) The spirit level delusion: fact-checking the left’s new theory of everything. Democracy Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer H (1970[1851]) Social statistics: or, the conditions essential to human happiness specified and the first of them developed. Gregg, Farnborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr N (1994) Arbeit, Eigentum und Wissen. Zur Theorie von Wissensgesellschaften [Labor, property, and knowledge. To the theory of knowledge societies]. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark M (2008) Science and the limits of knowledge. In: Meusburger P, Welker M, Wunder E (eds) Knowledge and space, vol 1, Clashes of knowledge. Orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (2008) The end of neo-liberalism? Project Syndicate Commentary, July. Retrieved 26 June 2011 from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/stiglitz101/English

  • Stratton A (2009). Senior Tories join advisory board of Demos. guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 14 May 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/07/demos-george-osborne-thinktank

  • Strauss L (1987) Plato. In: Strauss L, Cropsey J (eds) History of political philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 33–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1982) Instrumentality, identity and social comparisons. In: Tajfel H (vol ed) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 483–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 25–74

    Google Scholar 

  • The Japan Times (2011) Ishihara apologizes for ‘divine punishment’ remark. Retrieved 16 Apr 2012, from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20110315x7.html

  • The Observer (2009) Books of the year: what kept you turning the pages? Retrieved 27 May 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/nov/22/books-of-the-year-2009

  • Thompson J (1981) What’s wrong with science? Arena 58:30–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger L, Fox R (1971) The imperial animal. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Timár J (2006) The transformation of social and cultural geography during the transition period (1989 to present time) in Hungary. Soc Cult Geogr 7:649–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville A (2010[1835/1840]) Democracy in America. Historical-Critical Edition of De le démocratie en Amérique. (Nolla E (ed). Translated from the French by Schleifer JT). Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee P (2009) David Cameron, social policy butterfly. guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 12 Apr 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/10/david-cameron-hugo-young-welfare

  • Turner JC (1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Tajfel H (vol ed) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 15–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester HG (2009) Kompendium der Soziologie II: die klassiker [Compendium of sociology II: the classics]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Villányi D, Junge M, Brock D (2009) Soziologische systemtheorie [Sociological system theory]. In: Brock D, Junge M, Diefenbach H, Keller R, Villányi D (eds) Soziologische Paradigmen nach Talcott Parsons [Sociological paradigms after Talcott Parsons]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 337–397

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bogdandy OA (2003) Zur Ökologie einer europäischen Identität. Soziale Repräsentationen von Europa und dem Europäer-Sein in Deutschland und Italien [To the ecology of a European identity. Social representations of Europe and Europeanness in Germany and Italy]. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Waibel L (1933) Probleme der Landwirtschaftsgeographie [Issues of agricultural geography]. Wirtschaftsgeographische Abhandlungen [Essays on economic geography] Nr. 1. Ferdinand Hirt, Breslau

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward K (2009a) Inequality, spatial. In: Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, Watts M, Whatmore S (eds) The dictionary of human geography, 5th edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 380–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward K (2009b) Territorial justice. In: Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, Watts M, Whatmore S (eds) The dictionary of human geography, 5th edn. Wiley, Chichester, p 744

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner PP (1961) Some problems and methods in the history of ideas. J Hist Ideas 22:531–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisfeld GE, Beresford JM (1982) Erectness of posture as an indicator of dominance or success in humans. Motiv Emot 6:113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2010a) The spirit level. Why equality is better for everyone, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2010b) In defence of equality. Prospect Mag. Retrieved 13 May 2011, from http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2010/08/in-defence-of-equality

  • Willetts D (2009) The meaning of Margaret. Prospect Mag. Retrieved 15 May 2011, from http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/05/themeaningofmargaret

  • Winstanley G (1649) The true levellers’ standard advanced. London. Retrieved 18 Apr 2012, from http://www.bilderberg.org/land/diggers.htm#True

  • Wiser JL (1983) Political philosophy: a history of the search for order. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn J (1979) Minimal politics: the political organization of the Hadza of North Tanzania. In: Shack WA, Cohen PS (eds) Politics in leadership. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 244–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn J (1982) Egalitarian societies. Man 17:431–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder E (2008) Introduction to the volume. Clashes of knowledge inside, outside, and at the threshold of science. In: Meusburger P, Welker M, Wunder E (eds) Knowledge and space, vol 1, Clashes of knowledge. Orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann A (2009) Systemtheorie [System theory]. In: Kneer G, Schroer M (eds) Handbuch soziologische theorien [Handbook of sociological theories]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 469–490

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gyuris, F. (2014). The Debate Over Social Disparities and the Disparity Discourse. In: The Political Discourse of Spatial Disparities. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01508-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics