Advertisement

Technology Enhanced Learning – The Wild, the Innocent and the E Street Shuffle

  • Vladan Devedzic
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 231)

Abstract

Although Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) is still developing and attracts a lot of R&D attention, initiatives and funding worldwide, it has been around for quite some time and allows for a critical assessment. Once just "somewhere at the intersection of pedagogy and learning technology", today TEL spans many other fields and phenomena, like social and organizational processes, computer games, knowledge management, standardization, policy making in various sectors, sustaining the impact of learning, and efforts to overcome digital divide. Still, not everything goes smoothly. As reports and surveys indicate, there are many challenges ahead, still waiting to be tackled.

Keywords

Technology enhanced learning TEL pedagogy ICT in education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, B., et al.: The peeragogy handbook (2013) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Attwell, G.: Personal Learning Environments – the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers 2(1), 1–7 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Attwell, G., Hughes, J.: Pedagogic Approaches to Using Technology for Learning: Literature Review (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandura, A.: Social Learning Theory (1977) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barra, P., Usman, S.: Technology enhanced learning and assessment (2013), http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/disciplines/biosciences/2013/Barra&Usman.pdf
  6. 6.
    Beetham, H., McGill, L., Littlejohn, A.: Thriving in the 21st century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA project). The Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: The cooperative game, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coffield, F.: Just suppose teaching and learning became the first priority. Learning and Skills Network (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, D.: revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3), 311–344 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cormier, D.: Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate 4(5) (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Devedzic, V.: Semantic Web and Education. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dror, I.E.: Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(2), 215–223 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duval, E.: Attention Please! Learning Analytics for Visualization and Recommendation. In: Proceedings of LAK11: 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 9–17. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellis, R.K.: Field Guide to Learning Management Systems. ASTD Learning Circuits (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engeström, Y.: Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation. In: Perspectives on Activity Theory: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive & Computational Perspectives, pp. 19–38 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feden, P., Vogel, R.: Education. McGraw-Hill, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gulz, A., Silvervarg Flycht-Eriksson, A., Sjödén, B.: Design for off-task interaction – rethinking pedagogy in technology enhanced learning. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 204–206. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England): Enhancing Learning and Teaching Through the Use of Technology: A revised approach to HEFCE’s strategy for e-learning (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoffman, B., Ritchie, D.C.: Teaching and learning online: Tools, templates, and training. Technology and Teacher Educational Annual (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Instructional Design Central: What is Instructional Design (2012), http://www.instructionaldesigncentral.com/htm/IDC_instructionaldesigndefinitions.htm
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    JISC: Celebrating 10,000 followers... and our resources to help engage students through social media (2012), http://www.jiscs.ac.uk/news/stories/2012/08/socialmedia.aspx
  23. 23.
    JISC: Effective Practice in a Digital Age: A guide to technology-enhanced learning and teaching. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2009), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepracticedigitalage.pdf
  24. 24.
    Joseph, B., et al.: Six ways to look at badging systems designed for learning (2012), http://www.olpglobalkids.org/content/six-ways-look-badging-systems-designed-learning
  25. 25.
    Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Enhancing learning and teaching through technology: a guide to evidence-based practice for academic developers (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P.: Introducing TPCK. In: Colbert, J.A., Boyd, K.E., Clark, K.A., Guan, S., Harris, J.B., Kelly, M.A., Thompson, A.D. (eds.) Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Educators, pp. 1–29 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Merrill, M.D., Drake, L., Lacy, M.J., Pratt, J.: ID2_Research_Group: Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology 36(5), 5–7 (1996)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meyer, J.: What would you do if you knew you couldn’t fail? Creating S.M.A.R.T. Goals. Attitude Is Everything: If You Want to Succeed Above and Beyond. Meyer Resource Group, Incorporated (2003) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morrison, G.R.: Designing Effective Instruction, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nicol, D.: The foundation for graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer assessment. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher education. London, UK (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Donnell, A.M., King, A.: Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, UK (1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Malley, C., et al.: Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. MOBIlearn (2003), http://www.mobilearn.org/download/results/guidelines.pdf
  33. 33.
    Pata, K.: Revising the framework of knowledge ecologies: How activity patterns define learning spaces? In: Lambropoulos, N., Romero, M. (eds.) Educational Social Software for Context-Aware Learning: Collaborative Methods & Human Interaction, pp. 1–23. IGI Global, Hershley (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Price, L., Kirkwood, A.: Technology enhanced learning – where’s the evidence? In: Proceedings of ascilite 2010 conference, Sydney, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Richardson, V.: Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers College Record 105(9), 1623–1640 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharples, M., et al.: Innovating Pedagogy 2012: Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers. Open University, Milton Keynes (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Siemens, G.: Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(1), 3–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Siemens, G.: What Are Learning Analytics? (2010), http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/08/25/what-are-learning-analytics/
  39. 39.
    Ulicsak, M., Wright, M.: Games in Education: Serious Game (2010), http://media.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit_reviews/Serious-Games_Review.pdf
  40. 40.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press (1978)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walker, R., Voce, J., Ahmed, J.: 2012 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK. Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang, L.: Sociocultural Learning Theories and Information Literacy Teaching Activities in Higher Education. Reference & User Services Quarterly 47(2), 149–158 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wikipedia: E-Learning (2013), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-learning
  44. 44.
    Wiseman, B.: Introducing Levi-Strauss and Structural Anthropology. Totem Books (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Organizational SciencesUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations