Advertisement

Privatization and Government Preferences in a Mixed Duopoly: Stackelberg Versus Cournot

  • Fernanda A. Ferreira
  • Flávio Ferreira
Chapter
Part of the Nonlinear Systems and Complexity book series (NSCH, volume 6)

Abstract

We analyse the relationship between the privatization of a public firm and government preferences for tax revenue, by considering a (sequential) Stackelberg duopoly with the public firm as the leader. We assume that the government payoff is given by a weighted sum of tax revenue and the sum of consumer and producer surplus. We get that if the government puts a sufficiently larger weight on tax revenue than on the sum of both surpluses, it will not privatize the public firm. In contrast, if the government puts a moderately larger weight on tax revenue than on the sum of both surpluses, it will privatize the public firm. Furthermore, we compare our results with the ones previously published by an other author obtained in a (simultaneous) Cournot duopoly.

Keywords

Stackelber duopoly Cournot duopoly Mixed duopoly Privatization Tax rate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ESEIG and Polytechnic Institute of Porto for their financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Brander JA, Spencer BJ (1984) Tariff protection and imperfect competition. In: Kierzkowski H (ed) Monopolistic competition and international trade: 194–207. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chao C-C, Yu E (2006) Partial privatization, foreign competition, and optimum tariff. Rev Int Econ 14:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke R, Collie DR (2006) Optimum-welfare and maximum-revenue tariffs under Bertrand duopoly. Scot J Polit Econ 53:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Fraja G, Delbono F (1990) Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. J Econ Surv 4:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferreira FA, Ferreira F (2009) Maximum-revenue tariff under Bertrand duopoly with unknown costs. Comm Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 14:3498–3502CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferreira FA, Ferreira F (2012) Privatization and government preference in a public Stackelberg leader duopoly. In: IEEE 4th international conference on nonlinear science and complexity proceedings, Budapest, pp 87–89Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fjell K, Heywood J (2004) Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms’s moves: the relevance of privatization. Econ Lett 53:411–416MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kato H (2008) Privatization and government preference. Econ Bull 12:1–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larue B, Gervais J-P (2002) Welfare-maximizing and revenue-maximizing tariffs with few domestic firms. Can J Econ 35:786–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsumura T (1998) Partial privatization in mixed Duopoly. J Publ Econ 70:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White M (1996) Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Econ Lett 53:189–195CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESEIG - Polytechnic Institute of PortoVila do CondePortugal

Personalised recommendations