Skip to main content
  • 149k Accesses

Abstract

Until around 1970s, tensors were almost completely synonymous with (general) relativity except for a minor use in hydrodynamics. Students of physics did not need to study tensors until they took a course in the general theory of relativity. Then they would read the introductory chapter on tensor algebra and analysis, solve a few problems to condition themselves for index “gymnastics”, read through the book, learn some basic facts about relativity, and finally abandon it (unless they became relativists).

Today, with the advent of gauge theories of fundamental particles, the realization that gauge fields are to be thought of as geometrical objects, and the widespread belief that all fundamental interactions (including gravity) are different manifestations of the same superforce, the picture has changed drastically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We denote vectors by roman boldface, and tensors of higher rank by sans serif bold letters.

  2. 2.

    Here, we are assuming that acts on an object (such as v) by “pairing it up” with an appropriate factor of which is composed (such as \({\pmb{\epsilon}}^{j}\)).

  3. 3.

    When there is no risk of confusion, we shall delete from , it being understood that all tensors are defined on some given underlying vector space.

  4. 4.

    The use of in is by convention. Since a member of acts on p dual vectors, it is more natural to use .

  5. 5.

    The reader should be warned that different authors may use different numerical coefficients in the definition of the exterior product.

  6. 6.

    Note that is the extension of the pullback operator introduced at the end of Chap. 2.

  7. 7.

    See also Problem 5.37.

  8. 8.

    It turns out to be more natural to consider J as a 3-form. However, such a fine distinction is not of any consequence for the present discussion.

References

  1. Abraham, R., Marsden, J., Ratiu, T.: Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, R., Goldberg, S.: Tensor Analysis on Manifolds. Dover, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hassani, S. (2013). Tensors. In: Mathematical Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01195-0_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics