Advertisement

Device-Independent Witnesses of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement

  • Jean-Daniel Bancal
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

We consider the problem of determining whether genuine multipartite entanglement was produced in an experiment, without relying on a characterization of the systems observed or of the measurements performed. We present an n-partite inequality that is satisfied by all correlations produced by measurements on biseparable quantum states, but which can be violated by n-partite entangled states, such as Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states. In contrast to traditional entanglement witnesses, the violation of this inequality implies that the state is not biseparable independently of the Hilbert space dimension and of the measured operators. Violation of this inequality does not imply, however, genuine multipartite nonlocality. We show more generically how the problem of identifying genuine tripartite entanglement in a deviceindependent way can be addressed through semidefinite programming.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss NCCRs QP and QSIT, the European ERC-AG QORE, and the Brussels-Capital region through a BB2B grant.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Monz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130506 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Wieczorek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020504 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Gühne, G. Tóth, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Gühne, M. Seevinck, New J. Phys. 12, 053002 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Jungnitsch, T. Moroder, O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190502 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Huber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 022329 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Tóth, O. Gühne, M. Seevinck, J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. A 72, 014101 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Moroder et al., Phys. Rev. A 81, 052342 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Seevinck, J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012107 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Nagata, M. Koashi, N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 260401 (2002)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 230406 (2002)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Seevinck, G. Svetlichny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 060401 (2002)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Seevinck, J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042105 (2007)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Acín et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Pironio et al., Nature (London) 464, 1021 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Svetlichny, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3066 (1987)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Collins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 170405 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.-D. Bancal, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, Y.-C. Liang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020406 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N.D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990)MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    See supplemental material at http://link.apa.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106250404 for our biseparable model and the proofs related to Eqs. (4)–(6)
  22. 22.
    M. Żukowski, D. Kaszlikowski, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1682 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Navascués, S. Pironio, A. Acín, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010401 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Navascués, S. Pironio, A. Acín, New J. Phys. 10, 073013 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Pironio, M. Navascués, A. Acín, SIAM J. Optim. 20(5), 2157 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    B.M. Terhal, A.C. Doherty, D. Schwab, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 157903 (2003)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.C. Doherty, P.A. Parrilo, F.M. Spedalieri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187904 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Quantum TechnologiesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations