Advertisement

Bell Tests in Bipartite Scenarios

  • Jean-Daniel Bancal
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

If Bell experiments conducted so far have always suffered from one of the loophole described above, technological advances suggest that both the locality and the detection loophole might soon be closable within the same experiment. In order to make this happen, novel proposals taking into account present capabilities are highly welcome. Here we describe a proposal for a loophole-free Bell test, and analyse its feasibility.

Keywords

Bell Inequality Bloch Sphere Werner State Entangle Particle Barium Borate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Nha, H.J. Carmichael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020401 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Henkel, M. Krug, J. Hofmann, W. Rosenfeld, M. Weber, H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253001 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.-D. Bancal, N. Gisin, Y.-C. Liang, S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250404 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Cabello, J.-A. Larsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220402 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Cavalcanti, N. Brunner, P. Skrzypczyk, A. Salles, V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022105 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Anderlini, P.J. Lee, B.L. Brown, J. Sebby-Strabley, W.D. Phillips, J.V. Porto, Nature 448, 452–456 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Navascués, H. Wunderlich, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 466, 881–890 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    P. Trojek, C. Schmid, M. Bourennane, H. Weinfurter, C. Kurtsiefer, Opt. Expr. 12, 276 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Collins, N. Gisin, J. Phys. A: Math. and Gen. 37, 1775 (2004)MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Brunner, N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 372, 3162 (2008)MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Avis, H. Imai, T. Ito, J. Phys. A: Math. and Gen. 39, 11283 (2006)MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Pironio, A. Acín, S. Massar, A. Boyer de la Giroday, D.N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, D. Hayes, L. Luo, T.A. Manning, C. Monroe, Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022110 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Elitzur, S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, Phys. Lett. A 162, 25 (1992)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Aolita, R. Gallego, A. Acín, A. Chiuri, G. Vallone, P. Mataloni, A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032107 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Quantum TechnologiesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations