Skip to main content

Financial Determinants of Bank Profits: A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Banking Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalization of Financial Institutions

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to analyze the role of financial determinants on the bank profits in the Turkish Banking Sector. A comparative analysis has been conducted to predict the bank profits using Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Linear Regression (LR) models. The results illustrate that Net Interest Income After Specific Provisions/Total Operating Income, Non-Interest Income/Non-Interest Expense, Provision For Loan or Other Receivables Losses/Total Assets predictors have the most relative importance on SVR while Non-Interest Income/Non-Interest Expense, Provision For Loan or Other Receivables Losses/Total Assets predictors have it on LR. On the datasets containing these predictors, performances of SVR and LR models were compared based on Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics. The findings present that SVR predicts the level of bank profits better than classical LR model based on both metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahn, J. J., Oh, K. J., Kim, T. Y., & Kim, D. H. (2011). Usefulness of support vector machine to develop an early warning system for financial crisis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 2966–2973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhigbe, A., & McNulty, J. E. (2003). The profit efficiency of small US commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhigbe, A., & McNulty, J. E. (2011). Bank monitoring, profit efficiency and the commercial lending business model. Journal of Economics and Business, 63, 531–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpaydın, E. (2009). Introduction to machine learning. (2nd edn.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariff, M., & Can, L. (2008). Cost and profit efficiency of Chinese banks: A non-parametric analysis. China Economic Review, 19, 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basak, D., Pal, S., & Patranabis, D. C. (2007). Support vector regression. Neural Information Processing-Letters and Reviews, 11(10), 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Bonime, S. D., Covitz, D. M., & Hancock, D. (2000). Why are bank profits so persistent? The roles of product market competition, informational opacity, and regional/macroeconomic shocks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1203–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Yiming Y. (2011). Learning with support vector machines. (1st edn.). CA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. W., Hsieh, C. J., Chang, K. W., Ringgaard, M., & Lin, C. J. (2010). Training and testing low-degree polynomial data mappings via linear SVM. J Mach Learn Res, 11, 1471–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. H., & Shih, J. Y. (2006). A study of Taiwan’s issuer credit rating systems using support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications, 30(3), 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkassky, V., & Mulier, F. M. (2007) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. (2nd edn.). NY: Wiley-IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiorazzo, V., & Milani, C. (2011). The impact of taxation on bank profits: Evidence from EU banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 3202–3212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. F., & Lim, G. H. (1998). Share performance and profit efficiency of banks in an oligopolistic market: evidence from Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 8, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyree, K. B., & Spurlin, W. P. (2012). The effects of big-bank presence on the profit efficiency of small banks in rural markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 2593–2603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasa, A., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Financial deregulation and profit efficiency: A nonparametric analysis of Indian banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 61, 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R., & Hasan, I. (1998). The performance of de novo commercial banks: A profit efficiency approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farook, S., Hassan, M. K., & Clinch, G. (2012). Profit distribution management by Islamic banks: An empirical investigation. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gander, J. P. (2013). Integrating bank profit and risk-avoidance decisions for selected European countries: A micro–macro analysis. Economic Modelling, 31, 717–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnezditskaia, A. (2003). Russian banks’ profit strategies: the evidence from various types of banks. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36, 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Liu, H., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2011). The persistence of bank profit. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 2881–2890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E. (2011). Profit, productivity and distribution: Differences across organizational forms-The case of Spanish banks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, L. H. (2009). Knowledge discovery with support vector machines. NY: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi, M., & Singh, Y. P. (2012). Credit data fraud detection using kernel methods with support vector machine. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 2, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. L., Chen, M. C., & Wang, C. J. (2007). Credit scoring with a data mining approach based on support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 847–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. F. (2012). A hybrid stock selection model using genetic algorithms and support vector regression. Applied Soft Computing, 12(2), 807–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. J. (2003). Financial time series forecasting using support vector machines. Neurocomputing, 55(1–2), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmidou, K., Pasiouras, F., & Tsaklanganos, A. (2007). Domestic and multinational determinants of foreign bank profits: The case of Greek banks operating abroad. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 17, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maudos, J., Pastor, J. M., Perez, F., & Quesada, J. (2002). Cost and profit efficiency in European banks. J Int Financ Markets Institutions Money, 12(1), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, L. P., Ni, Z. W., & Gao, Y. Z. (2011). Stock trend prediction based on fractal feature selection and support vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5569–5576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Oliver, A., & Fumás, V. (2008). The output and profit contribution of information technology and advertising investments in banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samsudin, R., Shabri, A., & Saad, P. (2010). A Comparison of time series forecasting using support vector machine and artificial neural network model. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(11), 950–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. (2002). Learning with Kernels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, K. S., Lee, T. S., & Kim, H. (2005). An application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction model. Expert Systems with Applications, 28(1), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., & Li, H. (2012). Financial distress prediction using support vector machines: Ensemble vs individual. Applied Soft Computing, 12(8), 2254–2265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, J. A. K., Van Gestel, T., De Brabanter, J., De Moor, B., Vandewalle, J. (2002). Least squares support vector machines. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa-Ausina, E., Armero, C., Conesa, D., & Grifell-Tatje, E. (2012). Bootstrapping profit change: An application to Spanish banks. Computers and Operations Research, 39, 1857–1871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2003). Domestic and international determinants of bank profits: Foreign banks in Australia. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 1185–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao-si, X., Ting, C., Ruo-en, R. (2006). Studying on forecasting the enterprise bankruptcy based on SVM. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, pp. 1041–1045.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Dincer .

Editor information

Hasan Dincer Ümit Hacioglu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dincer, H., Hacioglu, Ü., Emir, S. (2014). Financial Determinants of Bank Profits: A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Banking Sector. In: Dincer, H., Hacioglu, Ü. (eds) Globalization of Financial Institutions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01125-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics