Advertisement

Trade Policy for Development: Paradigm Shift from Mercantilism to Liberalism

Chapter
  • 915 Downloads
Part of the The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific book series (PEAP, volume 13)

Abstract

At the end of 2011, the Republic of Korea (hereinafter Korea) became the ninth country to join the “one-trillion-dollar trading club,” departing from the ranks of newly emerging countries to join the ranks of trade giants. After reaching the $100 million mark in 1964, Korea’s exports grew more than five thousand times in 47 years, making it the seventh-largest exporting country in the world. Its economic development model has been characterized as export-oriented industrialization (EOI).

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product International Monetary Fund Trade Policy Asian Financial Crisis Export Promotion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia’s next giant: Korea and late industrialization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bergsten, F. (2000, July 13). Towards a tripartite world, The Economist, pp. 20–22.Google Scholar
  3. Bridges, B. (1993). Japan and Korea in the 1990s: From antagonism to adjustment. Bookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Cha, V. D. (1996). Bridging the gap: The strategic context of the 1965 Korea-Japan normalization treaty. Korean Studies, 20, 123–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, K.-S. (2007). The end of developmental citizenship? Restructuring and social displacement in post-crisis Korea. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(50), 67–72.Google Scholar
  6. Cheong, I. (1999). Economic impact of a Korea-Chile FTA and Its implications to Korean economy. KIEP (in Korean): Seoul.Google Scholar
  7. Chosun Ilbo (2006a, January 26). Screen quota cut clears way for Trade deal with US. http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2006/01/26/2006012661013.html.
  8. Chosun Ilbo (2006b, January 27).Will the post-screen quota measures be effective? http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2006/01/27/2006012770343.html.
  9. Chosun Ilbo (2007, June 29). Government to pay farmers, fishermen for FTA losses. http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2007/06/29/2007062961022.html.
  10. Chosun Ilbo (2009, July 14). FTA a chance to Bolster Korea’s lagging service Industry. http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/07/14/2009071400678.html.
  11. Dieter, H. (2009). Changing patterns of regional governance: From security to political economy? The Pacific Review, 22(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hundt, D. (2008). Korea: Squandering a mandate for change? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 62(4), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. International Monetary Fund, Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook (CD-ROM). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  14. Jurenas, R. & Mark E. M. (2010, September 23). US-Korea beef dispute: Issues and status. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service RL34528, Report for Members and Committees of Congress. http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL34528_20100923.pdf.
  15. Kim, S. (2011). Globalization and national responses: The case of Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 16(2), 165–179.Google Scholar
  16. Koo, M. G. (2006) From multilateralism to bilateralism? A shift in Korea’s trade strategy. In V. K. Aggarwal & S. Urata (Eds.), Bilateral trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific: origins, evolution, and implications. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 140–59.Google Scholar
  17. Koo, M. G. (2009a). Island disputes and maritime regime building in East Asia: between a rock and a hard place. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Koo, M. G. (2009b). Korea’s FTAs: Moving from an emulative to a competitive strategy. In M. Solis, B. Stallings, & S. N. Katada (Eds.), Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the pacific rim (pp. 181–197). Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Koo, M. G. (2010). Embracing free trade agreements Korean style: From developmental mercantilism to developmental liberalism. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 25(3), 101–123.Google Scholar
  20. Kwon, H. (2005). Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Development and Change, 36(3), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, J.-H. (1990). Korean-Japanese relations: The past present and future. Korea Observer, 21(2), 159–178.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, D. (1995a). A true record of Park Chung-Hee and Korea-Japan treaty negotiations: from 5–16 to its conclusion (in Korean). Seoul: Hansong.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, W. D. (1995b). The process of the Korea-Japan treaty. In The institute of national issues (Ed.), The Korea-Japan treaty revisited (In Korean). Seoul: Asia Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, S. (2006, April) The political economy of the Korea-US FTA: The Korean government’s FTA strategy revisited (in Korean). Paper presented at the convention of the Association of Korean Political and Diplomatic History.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, S. –J., Han, T. (2006). The demise of “Korea, Inc.”: Paradigm shift in Korea’s developmental state, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36(3), pp. 305–24.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, S.-J., & Hewison, K. (2010). Introduction: Korea and the antinomies of neo-liberal globalization. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim, H. (2010). The transformation of the developmental state and economic reform in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40(2), 188–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Finance and Economy (2005, November 22). Economic Bulletin, 27(11), Seoul: Ministry of Finance and Economy.Google Scholar
  29. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2004). Rules regarding the special law to support farmers and fishermen as a result of FTAs. Seoul: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. http://www.fta.go.kr/pds/data/200407224131655자유무역협정체결에따른농어업인등의지원에관한특별법시행규칙.pdf
  30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2006). Key initiatives of year 2006. Seoul: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.Google Scholar
  31. National Emergency Conference. (2007, March). Appeal to the Korean people. Seoul: National Emergency Conference to Urge to Stop the Rushed Korea-US FTA Negotiation. http://www.demos.or.kr/bbs/view.php?id=english&page=1&sn1=&divpage=1&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=74
  32. Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2006). The 2006 national trade estimate report on foreign trade barriers. Washington, DC: Office of the United States Trade Representative.Google Scholar
  33. Pempel, T. J. (1998). Regime shift: Comparative dynamics of the Japanese political economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pempel, T. J. (1999). Regional ups, regional downs. In T. J. Pempel (Ed.), The politics of the Asian economic crisis (pp. 62–78). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sohn, C.–H. (2001, June 12–13). Korea’s FTA developments: Experiences and perspectives with Chile, Japan, and the US. Paper presented at a conference of the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council Trade Policy Forum on Regional Trading Arrangements: Stocktake and Next Steps, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  36. Sohn, Y., & Koo, M. G. (2011). Securitizing trade: The case of the Korea-US free trade agreement. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(3), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wade, R. (2000). Wheels within wheels: Rethinking the Asian crisis and the Asian model. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woo, M. J. (2007). East Asia after the financial crisis. In The Korea Herald (ed.), Insight into Korea: Understanding challenges of the 21st century. Seoul: Herald Media.Google Scholar
  39. Woo-Cumings, M. (1999). Introduction: Chalmers Johnson and the politics of nationalism and development. In M. Woo Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank, World Development Indicators, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.
  41. Yamazawa, I. (1990). Economic development and international trade: The Japanese model. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Public AdministrationSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations