Skip to main content

Foundational Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Governance Theory

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

  • 2284 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we present some foundational concepts of EGT. We elaborate on functional and organisational differentiation and on formal, informal and dead institutions. The way these two sets of concepts are combined, forms the basis of our perspective on governance paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beunen, R., & Van Assche, K. (2013). Contested delineations: Planning, law and the governance of protected areas. Environment and Planning A, 45(6), 1285–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the the poor. Social and Legal Studies, 17(3), 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. (2005). Imperfect institutions: possibilities and limits of reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. (1991). Order without law. How neighbors settle disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Khasnobis, B., Kanbur, R., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2007). Linking the formal and informal economy. Concepts and policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Political theory in the welfare state. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2010). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, P. (2010). The company of strangers: a natural history of economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D. (2005). Organizational identity and self- transformation. An autopoietic perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2000). Die weltgesellschaft. Soziologische analysen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1989). How the law thinks: Towards a constructivist epistemology of law. Law & Society Review, 23(5), 727–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (Ed.). (1988). Autopoietic Law: A new approach to law and society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012). Formal/informal dialectics and the self-transformation of spatial planning systems: An exploration. Administration & Society, Online First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Jacobs, J., & Teampau, P. (2011a). Crossing trails in the marshes: rigidity and flexibility in the governance of the Danube Delta. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(8), 997–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., Beunen, R., & Teampau, P. (2011b). Delineating locals: Transformations of knowledge/power and the governance of the Danube Delta. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., Shtaltovna, A., Hornidge, A. K. (2013). Visible and invisible informalities and institutional transformation. Lessons from transition countries: Georgia, Romania, Uzbekistan. In N. Hayoz & C. Giordano (Eds.), Informality and post- socialist transition. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., & Van Biesebroeck, J. (2013). Governing the ice. Ice fishing villages on Lake Mille Lacs and the creation of environmental governance institutions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., & Verschraegen, G. (2008). The limits of planning: Niklas luhmann’s systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory, 7(3), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristof Van Assche .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Duineveld, M. (2014). Foundational Concepts. In: Evolutionary Governance Theory. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00984-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics