Skip to main content

Doing Well by Doing Good: Distinguishing the Right from the Good in Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Christian Ethics and Corporate Culture

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1481 Accesses

Abstract

Global economic and environmental circumstances require that business in the twenty-first century be practiced in a way that is economically vibrant enough to address the real needs of billions of people, yet ecologically informed so that the earth’s capacity to support life is not diminished by that activity and ethically sensitive enough that the human dignity is not lost or violated in the process. This paper will argue that any adequate model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) must meet these three normative standards: it must be economically, environmentally, and ethically sound. My argument to support this conclusion falls into two parts: arguments against the adequacy of mainstream models of CSR to meet these standards and arguments in support of the sustainability alternative. This alternative provides a contemporary model of the good company that is true to the Christian tradition as well as being economically and environmentally satisfactory for addressing global needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, 1970.

  2. 2.

    See Norman Bowie, “Morality, Money, and Motor Cars,” reprinted in Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, DesJardins and McCall (eds), Belmont, California: 2005, 5th ed.

  3. 3.

    The distinction rests upon the view that there is an ethically significant difference between acting and refraining, a distinction that has been seriously challenged. See, for example, the well-known essay by James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia” (New England Journal of Medicine, 1975) in which Rachels argues against the moral significance of this distinction as it has been employed in the ethics of euthanasia.

  4. 4.

    See Beyond Growth, by Herman Daly (Beacon Press, Boston: 1997).

  5. 5.

    My own thinking on this has been particularly influenced by three approaches. Herman Daly’s writing on ecological economics and especially in Beyond Growth; Amory Lovins, Hunter Lovins, and Paul Hawken’s Natural Capitalism; and William McDonough and Michael Braungart, in “The Next Industrial Revolution” and elsewhere.

  6. 6.

    These estimates are from Lester Brown, Eco-Economy: Building an economy for the Earth (W.W. Norton & Co., New York: 2001), Chapter 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph R. DesJardins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DesJardins, J.R. (2014). Doing Well by Doing Good: Distinguishing the Right from the Good in Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Okonkwo, B. (eds) Christian Ethics and Corporate Culture. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00939-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics