Skip to main content

The Case for a Humorous Philosophy of Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Humor, Laughter and Human Flourishing

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

  • 1125 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is designed to contextualize and advance the conversation among philosophers of education about humor and laughter by focusing on some interesting connections among humor, philosophy and education. I begin my analysis by discussing the nature and purpose of humor in general, while distinguishing it from laughter and amusement. I argue for an eclectic view of humor, one which integrates insights from different theories and avoids the reductionism that has often resulted from trying to create a comprehensive theory of humor. In the next part, I examine some of the historical tensions between traditional education and humor and laughter. I then proceed to lay out some important, though often neglected, similarities and links between humor and philosophy. In the final part of this essay, I attempt to respond to the question: what does a study of humor and laughter bring to philosophy of education?

An earlier version of this essay was published in Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, Vol. 25, n. 2, (Summer 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quoted in Norman Malcom's Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 27–28.

  2. 2.

    For a more comprehensive account of these similarities see Morreall’s (2009) book Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor pp. 126–129.

  3. 3.

    See the entry on the “Philosophy of Language,” in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, by Mark Crimmins, downloaded from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/U017, p. 2.

  4. 4.

    The defensive and depressive stances are not meant to be identified with any particular discourse in philosophy of education such as post-modernism or liberalism. Instead, they represent two fairly common psychological responses to the marginalization of philosophy of education.

  5. 5.

    Quoted from John Morreall’s forthcoming essay entitled “Humor, Philosophy and Education,” slated for a special issue of Educational Philosophy and Theory, (2013).

References

  • Allison, C. B. (1995). Present and past: Essays for teachers in the history of education. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (1999). Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(4), 378–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysostom, J. (1889). On the priesthood: Ascetic treatises; select homilies and letters; homilies on the statues. In Philip Schaffed (Ed.), A select library of the nicene and post-nicene fathers of the christian church (Vol. 9). New York: Christian Literature Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus, D. (1941). In praise of folly (Hoyt Hopewell Hudson, trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1966). Humor. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Collected papers (Vol. V, pp. 215–221). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, D. (2001). Self-depreciating humor in relation to laughter. Contemporary Philosophy, 23(5& 6), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1840). Human nature, Chap. 8, sect. 13. In W Molesworth (Ed.), English works, (vol. 4), London: Bohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcom, N. (2001). Ludwig wittgenstein: A memoir. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, C. (2008). “Being in on the joke: Pedagogy, race, humor”, philosophy of education 2008 (pp. 244–252). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (2009). Comic relief: A comprehensive philosophy of humor. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (1983). Taking laughter seriously. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (1987). The philosophy of laughter and humor. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1971). The absurd. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(20), 716–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). Thus spoke Zarathustra: Fourth part, the portable Nietzsche. (Walter Kaufmann, Trans. and intro.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968). Thus spoke Zarathustra: Fourth part, the portable Nietzsche (Walter Kaufmann, Trans. and intro.). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (1987). Laughter. In John Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of laughter and humor. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, G. (1877). The Philosophy of laughter and smiling. London: J. Burns.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vlieghe, J., Simons, M., & Masschelen, J. (2010). The Educational meaning of communal laughter: On the experience of corporeal democracy. Edu-Cational Theory, 60(6), 719–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mordechai Gordon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gordon, M. (2014). The Case for a Humorous Philosophy of Education. In: Humor, Laughter and Human Flourishing. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00834-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics