Skip to main content

Artifact Kinds, Identity Criteria, and Logical Adequacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Artefact Kinds

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 365))

Abstract

An important aspect of the alleged logical inadequacy of identity criteria for artifact kinds is the lack of transitivity. This formal problem can be eliminated through the use of a tool allowing for the gradual approximation of inadequate but normally adopted identity criteria. Although this does not solve the problem of so-called ontological respectability of artifacts, it shows that the mere lack of transitivity cannot be used to argue that artifacts are not ontologically respectable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a survey, see Carrara and Giaretta (2004). See also Lowe (1989a, b, 1997) and Williamson (1991).

  2. 2.

    We mention congruence in the list of constraints because, even if it is not a formal requirement on R like the others, it provides a further relevant criterion of selection among the possible R-relations that meet all the previous constraints.

  3. 3.

    Another example of the same position is Wiggins (2001).

  4. 4.

    Wiggins proposes (IC3) in (2001, pp. 72, 91).

  5. 5.

    On the topic of intransitivity of indistinguishability, see, for example, recent papers by Fults (2011), Raffman (2011), and Van Rooij (2011a, b).

References

  • Brand, M. (1977). Identity conditions for events. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14, 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara, M., & Gaio, S. (2009a). Approximating identity criteria. In V. A. Munz, K. Puhl, J. Wang (Eds.), Language and world: Papers of the 32nd international Wittgenstein symposium, Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, Vol. XVII, Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, Kirchberg am Wechsel (A), 2009: 127–133 (online on padua@research: http://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it/2255)

  • Carrara, M., & Gaio, S. (2009b). On the logical adequacy of identity criteria. In J. Alcolea, et al. (Eds.), Actas del VI congreso de la sociedad de logica, metodologia y filosofia de la ciencia en espana, University of Valencia, Valencia 2009: 37–41 (online on padua@research: http://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it/2267/)

  • Carrara, M., & Giaretta, P. (2001). Identity criteria and sortal concepts. In C. Welty & B. Smith (Eds.), Formal ontology in information systems (pp. 234–243). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara, M., & Giaretta, P. (2004). The many facets of identity criteria. Dialectica, 58, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara, M., & Vermaas, P. E. (2009). The fine-grained metaphysics of artifactual and biological functional kinds. Synthese, 169, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1969). The individuation of events. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Essays in honour of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 216–234). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, R., & Horsten, L. (2005). Closer. Synthese, 146(3), 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. (1991). Realism and truth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1884). Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine Logisch- Mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: Köbner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fults, S. (2011). Vagueness and scales. In P. Egré & N. Klinedinst (Eds.), Vagueness and language use (pp. 25–50). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. T. (1962). Reference and generality. An examination of some medieval and modern theories. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, E. G. (1999). Aristotle on artifacts: A metaphysical puzzle. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1978). Time and identity, manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, W. (1969). On nature itself, or on the inherent force and actions of created things. In Id. Philosophical papers and letters (L. E. Loemker, Trans.). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, L. (1986). Events: A metaphysical study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (1989a). Impredicative identity criteria and Davidson’s criterion of event identity. Analysis, 49, 178–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (1989b). What is a criterion of identity? The Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (1997). Objects and criteria of identity. In B. Hale & C. Wright (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 613–633). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (1998). The possibility of metaphysics. Substance, identity, and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘Meaning’. In Id. Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (pp. 215–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1985). Events and reification. In E. Lepore & B. McLaughlin (Eds.), Actions and events: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 162–171). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffman, D. (2011). Vagueness and observationality. In G. Ronzitti (Ed.), Vagueness. A guide (pp. 107–122). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soavi, M. (2009). Realism, antirealism and artefact kinds. Padova: Cleup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooij, R. (2011a). Vagueness and linguistics. In G. Ronzitti (Ed.), Vagueness. A guide (pp. 123–170). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooij, R. (2011b). Implicit versus explicit comparatives. In P. Egré & N. Klinedinst (Eds.), Vagueness and language use (pp. 51–72). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (2001). Sameness and substance renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (1986). Criteria of identity and the axiom of choice. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(7), 380–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (1990). Identity and discrimination. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (1991). Fregean directions. Analysis, 51, 194–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimiliano Carrara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carrara, M., Gaio, S., Soavi, M. (2014). Artifact Kinds, Identity Criteria, and Logical Adequacy. In: Franssen, M., Kroes, P., Reydon, T.A.C., Vermaas, P.E. (eds) Artefact Kinds. Synthese Library, vol 365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00801-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics