Skip to main content

Improvement in Uncertainty of Tuning Fork-Based Force Sensor Stiffness Calibration via the Indentation Method Using Direct Determination of Contact and Machine Compliance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1028 Accesses

Abstract

Noncontact-atomic force microscopy (NCAFM) combines atomic resolution imaging with the ability to measure forces at the atomic scale. Despite burgeoning applications for this method to measure force at the atomic scale, the metrology necessary to interpret the frequency shifts occurring in NCAFM sensors from tip-sample interactions is still in a very early stage of development. A key parameter in this measurement is the stiffness of the sensor being used in the measurement. Here we outline an improvement in the procedure for measuring the spring constant of a tuning fork-type sensor using an instrumented indenter. Instead of using models and materials properties to estimate the effect of contact and machine compliance, these quantities are directly measured by indenting the base of the tuning fork. This decreases the uncertainty in the measurement by nearly a factor of two.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Giessibl FJ, Hembacher S, Bielefeldt H, Mannhart J (2000) Subatomic features on the Silicon (111)-(7x7) surface observed by atomic force microscopy. Science 289:422–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ternes M, Lutz CP, Hirjibehedin CF, Giessibl FJ, Heinrich AJ (2008) The force needed to move an atom on a surface. Science 319:1066–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sweetman A, Jarvis S, Danza R, Bamidele J, Gangopadhyay S, Shaw GA, Kantorovich L, Moriarty P (2011) Toggling bistable atoms via mechanical switching of bond angle. Phys Rev Lett 106:136101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sader JE, Jarvis SP (2004) Accurate formulas for interaction force and energy in frequency modulation force spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 84:1801–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon GH, Heyde M, Rust H-P (2007) Recipes for cantilever parameter determination in dynamic force spectroscopy: spring constant and amplitude. Nanotechnology 18:22503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw GA, Pratt JR, Jabbour ZJ (2011) Small mass measurements for tuning fork-based atomic force microscope cantilever spring constant calibration. MEMS and Nanotechnology, vol 2. In: Proceedings of the 2010 annual conference on experimental and applied mechanics. Springer, New York, pp 4956–4965

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Vörden D, Lange M, Schmuck M, Schmidt N, Möller R (2012) Spring constant of a tuning fork sensor for dynamic force microscopy. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 3:809–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger J, Švec M, Müller M, Ledinský M, Fejfar A, Jelínek P, Majzik Z (2003) Characterization of the mechanical properties of qPlus sensors. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 4:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson KL (2001) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tables of physical & chemical constants (16th edn, 1995). 2.2.2 Elasticities and strengths. Kaye & Laby Online. Version 1.0, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Nardi P, Baek CW, Kim J-M, Kim Y-K (2005) Direct nanomechanical machining of gold nanowires using a nanoindenter and an atomic force microscope. J Micromech Microeng 15:551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

This article is authored by employees of the U.S. federal government, and is not subject to copyright. Commercial equipment and materials are identified in order to adequately specify certain procedures. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon A. Shaw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Society for Experimental Mechanics

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shaw, G.A. (2014). Improvement in Uncertainty of Tuning Fork-Based Force Sensor Stiffness Calibration via the Indentation Method Using Direct Determination of Contact and Machine Compliance. In: Shaw III, G., Prorok, B., Starman, L., Furlong, C. (eds) MEMS and Nanotechnology, Volume 5. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00780-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00780-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00779-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00780-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics