Skip to main content

Regional Security: Transfrontier Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Environmental to Comprehensive Security

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice ((BRIEFSTEXTS,volume 13))

  • 615 Accesses

Abstract

To achieve comprehensive human security requires the satisfaction of both of its two somewhat intertwined components, social security (with its political, military, economic, and ethical elements) and environmental security (with its utilization-oriented and protection-oriented elements) (Westing 1989a).

This Chapter is reproduced from the author’s Entry #245 provided in Chap. 2, with the original title, ‘Building confidence with transfrontier reserves: the global potential’. It is used here by permission of the United Nations Environment Programme, the copyright holder, as given on 18 March 2013. The author is grateful to Naigzy Gebremedhin and Carol E. Westing for their guidance. A preliminary version of this Chapter was presented at ‘The IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas’, Caracas, 10–21 February 1992, of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (Gland, Switzerland). All International Union for Conservation of Nature species threat categories have been updated to March 2013 (cf. www.iucnredlist.org).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As at February 2013, there are perhaps 195 sovereign states (the 193 members of the United Nations plus Taiwan and Vatican City).

  2. 2.

    Formally protected areas worldwide as of September 2012: 1.6 % of the ocean (although ca 7 % of territorial waters), and 12.7 % of the land (cf. http://www.unep-wcmc.org/ppr2012_903.html).

  3. 3.

    Cambodia rejoined the Committee in 1995 (which in addition to Laos and Viet Nam also included Thailand).

  4. 4.

    In January 2013 Russia established the Beringia National Park in its coastal Chutkutka Region, directly across from the US Bering Land Bridge Preserve, important for further setting the stage for bilateral cooperation.

  5. 5.

    The Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) is the subject of Chap. 7.

References

  • Archibald, G. 1975. Cranes over Panmunjom. International Wildlife (Vienna, VA) 5(5):18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batisse, M. 1986. Developing and Focusing the Biosphere Reserve Concept. Nature & Resources (Paris) 22(3):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, L. 1984. Costa Rica: Unarmed Democracy. London: Sheppard Press, 224 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, G.H. 1993. Transfrontier collaboration: a worldwide survey. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlie, I. 1979. African Boundaries: a Legal and Diplomatic Encyclopædia. London: C. Hurst, 1355 pp+2 maps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G.H.W. & Gorbachev, M.S. 1990. Joint statement on the establishment of a Soviet–United States international park in the region of the Bering Strait, June 1, 1990. Foreign Policy Bulletin (Washington) 1(1):8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoE. 1970. On the Creation of Regional and Transfrontier Natural Parks. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe, Consultative Assembly, Recommendation No. 587, 26 January 1970, 3 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukwurah, A.O. 1967. Settlement of Boundary Disputes in International Law. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 267 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumings, B. 1992. Spring thaw for Korea’s cold war? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Chicago) 48(3):14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, A.J. (ed.). 1987. Border and Territorial Disputes. 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman, 462 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück, J. 1982. Demilitarization, In: Bernhardt R. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Public International Law. III. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 299 pp: pp 150–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J.V. & Spergel, B.A. 1993. Protected natural areas: the financial challenge. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, D. 1980. Atlas of Territorial and Border Disputes. London: New English Library, 121 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, P.-M. 1982. Legal aspects of transfrontier regional co-operation. West European Politics (London) 5(4):50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, R. 1987. Ethiopia–Somalia. In: Day A.J. (ed.). Border and Territorial Disputes. 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman, 462 pp: pp 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, W. 1991. Wars and war-related deaths, 1500–1990. In: Sivard, R.L. (ed.). World Military and Social Expenditures 1991. 14th edn. Washington: World Priorities, 64 pp: pp 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. & Ehrlich, A. 1981. Extinction: the Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York: Random House, 306 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, T. 1990. Stockholm on the Mekong?: CBMs for Asia/Pacific. Pacific Review (Oxford) 3:55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, R.M. et al. 1987. Health-related outcomes of war in Nicaragua. American Journal of Public Health (Washington) 77:615–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEF. 1992a. Global Environment Facility: the Pilot Phase and Beyond. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction & Development (World Bank), GEF Working Paper Series No. 1, 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEF. 1992b. Poland Forest Biodiversity Protection Project: Project Document. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction & Development (World Bank), 76 pp+2 maps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girot, P.O. & Nietschmann, B.Q. 1991. Transborder conflicts and cooperation: the geopolitics of the Nicaragua–Costa Rica borderland. Boundary Bulletin (Durham, UK) 1991(1):19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetel, W. 1925. Great program of Poland and Czechoslovakia for national parks. Zoological Society Bulletin [now Wildlife Conservation] (New York) 28:26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetel, W. 1964. Parks between countries. In: Adams, A.B. (ed.). First World Conference on National Parks. Washington: US National Park Service, 471 pp+17 pl.: pp 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetel, W. et al. 1926. [Protocol: Conference of Polish and Czechoslovakian Scientists, Gathered in Cracow during 8 to 9 December 1925, on the Initiative of the Polish Academy of Science and the Czech Academy of Science] (in Polish). Warsaw: Polish Academy of Science, 15 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblat, J. 1982. Agreements for Arms Control: a Critical Survey. London: Taylor & Francis, 387 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblat, J. 1993. Confidence building as an approach to regional peace and security. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy-Warr, C. (ed.). 1990. International Boundaries and Boundary Conflict Resolution. Durham, UK: University of Durham, International Boundaries Research Unit, 428 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. 1988. Peace park. Oryx (London) 22:150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoàng Hòe. 1993. An Indochina tri-state reserve: the view from Viet Nam. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, R.A. (ed.). 1991. Fighting for Survival: Insecurity, People and the Environment in the Horn of Africa. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 181 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1985. Corbett Action Plan for Protected Areas of the Indomalayan Realm. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 23 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1990a. 1990 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 192 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1990b. 1990 United Nations List of National Parks and Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 275 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1990c. Promoting effective management of transfrontier parks and reserves: guidelines. In: Thorsell, J. (ed.). Parks on the Borderline: Experience in Transfrontier Conservation. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 98 pp: pp 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1990d. Resolutions and Recommendations: 18th Session of the General Assembly of IUCN — the World Conservation Union. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 63 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN, UNEP, & WWF. 1991. Caring for the Earth: a Strategy for Sustainable Living. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 228 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karliner, J. 1987. Make parks, not war. Amicus Journal (New York) 9(4):8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A.C. (ed.). 1983. Selected Multilateral Treaties in the Field of the Environment. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 525 pp. [Cf. Rummel-Bulska & Osafo, 1991.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasiúski, Z. 1990. Border where the bison roam. Natural History (NY) 1990(6):62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. 1986–1987. Of systems, boundaries, and territoriality: an inquiry into the formation of the state system. World Politics (Princeton, NJ) 39:27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. et al. 1985. Peace and Disputed Sovereignty: Reflections on Conflict over Territory. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 159 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largen, M.J. & Yalden, D.W. 1987. Decline of elephant and black rhinoceros in Ethiopia. Oryx (London) 21:103–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausche, B.J. 1980. Guidelines for Protected Areas Legislation. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, Environmental Policy & Law Paper No. 16, 108 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, A.C. & Dennett, R. (eds). 1954. European Peace Treaties after World War II: Negotiations and Texts of Treaties with Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary, Rumania, and Finland. Boston: World Peace Foundation, 341 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.G. & Wilson, R.T. 1975–1977. Plight of Swayne's hartebeest. Oryx (London) 13:490–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Line, L. 1973. Puffins without a country. National Wildlife (Vienna, VA) 11(2):36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, S. 1985. International Wildlife Law: an Analysis of International Treaties Concerned with the Conservation of Wildlife. Cambridge, UK: Grotius Publications, 470 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J.R. 1993. An Indochina tri-state reserve: the practical challenges. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J.R. & Stuart, S.N. (eds). 1989. The Kouprey: an Action Plan for its Conservation. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 19 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, R. 1980. Roots of the modern interstate border dispute. Journal of Conflict Resolution (Beverly Hills, CA) 24:427–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. 1993. Conservation and development: how protected natural areas can contribute to local communities. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. et al. 1990. Conserving the World's Biological Diversity. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature et al., 193 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, R.J. 1991. Machias Seal Island international park: a proposed resolution of a territorial conflict. In: Dykeman, F.W. (ed.). Rural Land Management: Perspectives from Canada and the United States. Sackville, New Brunswick: Mount Allison University, 168 pp: pp 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok Mareth. 1993. An Indochina tri-state reserve: the view from Cambodia. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1979. The Sinking Ark: a New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 307 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J.I. 1974. International parks and cooperation for more effective management. In: Elliott, H. (ed.). Second World Conference on National Parks. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 504 pp: pp 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. et al. 1989. Responsibility of states in respect of the exercise of permanent sovereignty over natural resources. Netherlands International Law Review (Dordrecht) 36:285–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, G., et al. 1982. Comprehensive Study on Confidence-building Measures. New York: UN Centre for Disarmament, Disarmament Study Series No. 7 (A/36/474), 42 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, J.R.V. 1987. Political Frontiers and Boundaries. rev. edn. London: Allen & Unwin, 315 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W.V. & Miller, K.R. 1989. Keeping Options Alive: the Scientific Basis for Conserving Diversity. Washington: World Resources Institute, 128 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R.A. 1988–1989. Casualty of war: the Nicaraguan environment. Technology Review (Cambridge, MA) 92(4):62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel-Bulska, I. & Osafo, S. (eds). 1991. Selected Multilateral Treaties in the Field of the Environment. II. Cambridge, UK: Grotius Publications, 527 pp. [cf. Kiss, 1983.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussay, C. du. 1980. Transfrontier parks. Unasylva (Rome) 32(127):16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, G.B. 1975–1977. Mountain mammals in Pakistan. Oryx (London) 13:351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, N.J. 1988. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources versus common heritage of mankind: complementary or contradictory principles of international economic law? In: Waart, P. de et al. (eds). International Law and Development. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 457 pp: pp 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, N.J. 1993. Sovereignty and the sharing of natural resources. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S.P. 1976. International Boundary Disputes and International Law: a Policy-oriented Study. Bombay: N.M. Tripathi, 323 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, A.W. 1983. Restoring the bison's habitat in Bialowieza. Ambio (Stockholm) 12:197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H. & Most, B.A. 1983. Contagion and border effects on contemporary African conflict. Comparative Political Studies (Beverly Hills, CA) 16:92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. & Foss, R. (eds). 1987. Two Koreas — One Future? Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 167 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tägil, S. 1982. The question of border regions in western Europe: an historical background. West European Politics (London) 5(4):18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tägil, S. et al. 1977. Studying Boundary Conflicts: a Theoretical Framework [transl. from the Swedish by M. Metcalf]. Lund: University of Lund, Lund Studies in International History No. 9, 215 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsell, J. & Harrison, J. 1990. Parks that promote peace: a global inventory of transfrontier nature reserves. In: Thorsell, J. (ed.). Parks on the Borderline: Experience in Transfrontier Conservation. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 98 pp: pp 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouless, C. 1987. Kampuchean wildlife: survival against the odds. Oryx (London) 21:223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønnesson, S. 1989. Proposals for a lasting peace in Indochina. Bulletin of Peace Proposals [now Security Dialogue] (Oslo) 20:265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønnesson, S. 1993. Peace and war: cooperation and conflict in 20th century Indochina. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • USCA. 1992. United States Code Annotated. St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, numerous volumes & supplements [complete through 1991].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallentyne, J.R. & Beeton, A.M. 1988. 'Ecosystem' approach to managing human uses and abuses of natural resources in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental Conservation (Cambridge, UK) 15:58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, E.B. et al. 1992. International Environmental Law: Basic Instruments and References. Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers, 749 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1980. Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment. London: Taylor & Francis, 249 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1982. War as a human endeavor: the high-fatality wars of the twentieth century. Journal of Peace Research (Oslo) 19:261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1984. How much damage can modem war create? In: Barnaby, F. (ed.). Future War. London: Michael Joseph, 192 pp: pp 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1988. Military sector vis-à-vis the environment. Journal of Peace Research (Oslo) 25:257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1989a. Comprehensive human security and ecological realities. Environmental Conservation (Cambridge, UK) 16:295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1989b. Environmental approaches to regional security. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Comprehensive Security for the Baltic: an Environmental Approach. London: Sage Publications, 148 pp: pp 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1989c. Environmental security for the Danube basin. Environmental Conservation (Cambridge, UK) 16:323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1990a. Our place in nature: reflections on the global carrying-capacity for humans. In: Polunin, N. & Burnett, J.H. (eds). Maintenance of the Biosphere. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 228 pp: pp 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1990b. Towards eliminating war as an instrument of foreign policy. Bulletin of Peace Proposals [now Security Dialogue] (Oslo) 21:29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1991. Environmental security and its relation to Ethiopia and Sudan. Ambio (Stockholm) 20:168–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1992. Protected natural areas and the military. Environmental Conservation (Cambridge, UK) 19:343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1993a. Existing regional Indochina agreements. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1993b. From hope to reality: establishing an Indochina tri-state reserve for peace and nature. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1993c. Indochinese peninsula: facts and figures. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. 1993d. Transfrontier reserves for peace and nature: select bibliography. In: Westing, A.H. (ed.). Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: a Contribution to Human Security. Nairobi: UN Environment Programme, 127 pp: pp 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, A.H. & Westing, C.E. 1981. Endangered species and habitats of Viet Nam. Environmental Conservation (Cambridge, UK) 8:59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille, C. 1991. Peace is hell! Audubon (NY) 93(1):62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willot, A. et al. 1981. Study on All the Aspects of Regional Disarmament. New York: UN Centre for Disarmament, Disarmament Study Series No. 3 (A/35/416), 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E.C. 1987. On the Brink of Extinction: Conserving the Diversity of Life. Washington: Worldwatch Institute, Paper No. 78, 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, P. 1989. War — or Peace — in North-east Africa? London: Centre for Security & Conflict Studies, Conflict Study No. 219, 29 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI. 1992. World Resources 1992-93: a Report by the World Resources Institute. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 385 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.R. 1981. Fragile victory for beauty on an old Asian battleground. Smithsonian (Washington) 12(7):56–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur H. Westing .

Appendices

Miscellaneous International Agreements (Actual or Proposed)

1.1 Benin/Burkina Faso/Niger W Parks

A reserve established by France during the time it exerted control over West Africa (so named because the Niger River flowing through it takes the shape there of a ‘W’) subsequently became fragmented into three parts: W National Park in Benin (568,000 ha; established 1954; IUCN II); W National Park in Burkina Faso (235,000 ha; established 1954; IUCN II); and W National Park in Niger (220,000 ha; established 1954; IUCN II). In 1965, the regional intergovernmental Council of the Entente (Abidjan) submitted a plan to the three relevant governments to establish a single reserve authority, which has not been acted upon as of early 1993 and which is no longer an activity of the Council.

1.2 Roosevelt Campobello International Park

In 1964, Canada and the USA established the former Franklin Delano Roosevelt estate on Campobello Island (which is Canadian territory) as an ‘International Park’, placing it under the control of a joint Canadian–US ‘International Park Commission’ (UNTS 7674; for the relevant US legislation, cf. USCA 1992, Title 16, §§1101–1113). The Roosevelt Campobello International Park (1,000 ha; established 1964; IUCN unlisted), although not so much a natural reserve as an international memorial and museum, is of interest in the present context because it functions as a true bilateral entity under the legal control of a bilateral commission.

1.3 Machias Seal Island International Park

Machias Seal Island is an approximately 6 ha island in the Bay of Fundy. It is located about 16 km from both Canada and the USA (at 44°30′N–67°08′W). Both countries claim the island (Line 1973; McNeil 1991). The island is an important nesting site for various colonial seabirds, including the Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica; IUCN Least Concern), razorbill (Alca torda; IUCN Least Concern), Leach’s storm petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa; IUCN Least Concern), and thin-billed murre (Uria aalge; IUCN Least Concern), and is also an important rest stop for numerous migratory birds—making the island a favorite site for ornithologists to visit. One solution to the contested sovereignty of the island would be to establish it as an international wildlife sanctuary, either under unchallenged or joint sovereignty (McNeil 1991).

1.4 Bialowieza Primeval Forest

The Bialowieza forest, which straddles the Belarus/Polish border, is one of the largest remaining relatively undisturbed forest ecosystems in Europe, inter alia, providing the habitat for the wisent (Bison bonasus; IUCN Vulnerable) (Krasiúski 1990; Sokolowski 1983; Westing 1980: 57). Some level of protection is now provided by the Belovezhskaya Pushcha Hunting Reserve in Belarus (87,600 ha; established 1940; IUCN IV) opposite Bialowieza National Park in Poland (5,300 ha; established 1932; IUCN II; world heritage; UNESCO biosphere reserve). The Global Environment Facility (Washington) (GEF 1992a) has recently approved a project, with substantial funding, in support of the Polish portion of the forest (GEF 1992b); and is considering similar support for the Belarus portion (GEF 1992b: 69–72).

1.5 La Amistad International Park

Three contiguous protected natural areas encompass the middle and upper reaches of the Talamanca Mountain range, meant to protect one of the largest and most biologically diverse virgin forests in Central America: Chirripó National Park in Costa Rica (50,200 ha; established 1975; IUCN II), Cordillera de Talamanca (= La Amistad) National Park in Costa Rica (193,900 ha; established 1982; IUCN II; UNESCO biosphere reserve), and La Amistad National Park in Panama (207,000 ha; established 1988; IUCN II). Among the extraordinarily rich flora and fauna in these parks are a number of mammals threatened with extinction, including the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis = Felis pardalis; IUCN Least Concern), jaguar (Panthera onca; IUCN Near Threatened), and Central American tapir (Tapirus bairdii; IUCN Endangered); as well as a number of birds, including the resplendent quetzal (Pharomachrus mocinno; IUCN Near Threatened) and harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja; IUCN Near threatened). An agreement for natural resources border cooperation was concluded between Costa Rica and Panama in 1979, and a decision to establish an international friendship park was reached in 1982. Currently, the Organization of American States (Washington) is in the process of reaching an understanding with the United Nations Environment Programme (Nairobi) to assist Costa Rica and Panama in developing a program of forest management for the region, and to provide funding for that endeavor.

Waterton–Glacier International Peace Park

In 1932, the US Congress authorized that, pending similar action by Canada, Glacier National Park ‘shall become a part of an international park to be known as the Waterton–Glacier International Peace Park’ (USCA 1992, Title 16, §161a). However, the portion within the USA ‘shall be designated as the Glacier National Park’ (USCA 1992, Title 16, §161b); and the Glacier National Park ‘shall be under the exclusive control of the [US] Secretary of the Interior (USCA 1992, Title 16, §162). In the same year, the Canadian Parliament took similar unilateral action. However, no bilateral treaty has as yet been concluded between Canada and the USA that would provide for the establishment of a transfrontier protected natural area.

The 1924 Cracow Protocol

In connection with a boundary dispute in the aftermath of World War I, representatives of Czechoslovakia and Poland produced a joint protocol (Cracow, 6 May 1924; entry into force, 5 September 1924; LNTS unlisted), inter alia recommending the establishment of four pairs of contiguous frontier protected natural areas and calling upon their two respective governments to conclude a bilateral treaty to enable such coordinate action (Goetel 1925; Goetel et al. 1926). The Protocol called for the establishment, in the first instance, of independent contiguous reserves in the border-straddling Tatra Mountains (outlined in the text above). Another of the three other recommendations has also come to pass: the Pieninsky National Park in Slovakia (2,000 ha; established 1967; IUCN II) opposite the Pieniny National Park in Poland (2,000 ha; established 1932; IUCN II). However, no bilateral treaty has as yet been concluded between Slovakia and Poland that would provide for the establishment of a transfrontier protected natural area.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Westing, A.H. (2013). Regional Security: Transfrontier Cooperation. In: From Environmental to Comprehensive Security. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice(), vol 13. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00687-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics