Advertisement

The Effects of Configurational and Functional Factors on the Spatial Distribution of Pedestrians

  • Yoav LermanEmail author
  • Itzhak Omer
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

The research presented here deals with pedestrian movement in two adjacent areas located in the city of Tel-Aviv that were established in different periods and according to different city planning doctrines: pre-modern and modern urban planning. Consequently, these areas differ in the street network spatial-configurational attributes and in the functional built environment attributes. Statistical and geographical analysis showed that in spite of their physical proximity, the two areas examined in this study differed significantly in the volume and the geographical distribution of pedestrian movement as well as in the explaining attributes of this distribution. It was found that in pre-modern environment, pedestrian movement is more predictable and has higher correlation to the spatial-configurational attributes of street network than in modern environment. The findings of this research can contribute to a greater understanding of the factors that shape pedestrian movement in pre-modern and modern urban environments.

Keywords

Street Network Street Segment Local Choice Public Transit Western Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chu SCH (2005) When and why do people walk in the city: the influence of urban elements on time-pattern of pedestrian movement. In: 6th international Walk 21 conference in ZurichGoogle Scholar
  2. Hillier B (1996) Space is the Machine. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Hillier B (2002) A theory of the city as object: or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Urban Des Int 7:153–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hillier B, Penn A, Hanson J, Grajewski T, Xu J (1993) Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in Urban pedestrian movement. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 20:29–66Google Scholar
  5. Hillier B, Iida S (2005) Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement. In: 5th International space syntax symposium in DelftGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang B (2009a) Ranking spaces for predicting human movement in an urban environment. Int J Geograph Inf Sci 23(7):823–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jiang B (2009b) Street Hierarchies: a minority of streets account for a majority of traffic flow. Int J Geograph Inf Sci 23(8):1033–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang B, Claramunt C (2004) A structural approach to the model generalization of an urban street network. Geo Informatica 8:157–171Google Scholar
  9. Marom N (2009) City of concept: planning Tel-Aviv. Babel Press, Tel-Aviv in HebrewGoogle Scholar
  10. Ozbil A, Peponis J, Stone B (2011) Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Des Int 16:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ozer O, Kubat AS (2007) Walking initiatives: a quantitative movement analysis. In: 6th International space syntax symposium in IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  12. Penn A, Hillier B, Banister D, Xu J (1998) Configurational modeling of urban movement networks. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 25:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raford N, Ragland DR (2006) Pedestrian volume modeling for traffic safety and exposure analysis: case of Boston. Massachusetts. Transportation research board 85th annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  14. Read S (1999) Space syntax and the Dutch city. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 26:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Turner A (2007) From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 34:539–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang L, Zhuang Y, Dai X (2012) A configurational study of pedestrian flows in multi-level commercial space. Case study Shanghai. In: 8th International space syntax symposium in Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations