Abstract
In this chapter some modern applications of laser-matter interaction in the field of atomic physics are reviewed. Due to the availability of short and strong laser pulses a range of new and partly counter-intuitive phenomena can be observed. Some of these are:
-
Above Threshold Ionization (ATI)
-
Multi-Photon Ionization (MPI)
-
Localization of Rydberg atoms by Half Cycle Pulses (HCP)
-
High-order Harmonic Generation (HHG)
These phenomena can in general not be understood in the framework of perturbation theory. It turns out that the time-dependent wavepacket approach of Chap. 2 is the method of choice to describe and understand a lot of the new atomic physics in strong laser fields. In the present chapter we will almost exclusively deal with the dynamics of a single electron, initially bound in a Coulomb potential. This chapter will therefore begin with a short review of the unperturbed hydrogen atom, together with atomic units. After the discussion of different aspects of field induced ionization, HHG will be reviewed in detail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Taking the finiteness of the proton mass into account would lead to the replacement of the electron mass by the reduced mass μ=m e M p/(m e+M p) in the final solution.
- 2.
- 3.
The length scale a 0 in the bare 3d Coulomb problem appears only in the solution.
- 4.
Note that each symmetric well potential in 1d has at least one bound state, no matter how shallow it is [11].
- 5.
A direct comparison with the RWA results of Chap. 3 would ask for an extension of the two-level results to pulsed driving and in addition the dipole matrix element would have to be calculated.
- 6.
This is another occurrence of the area theorem of Sect. 3.2.
- 7.
The creation of radiation in the soft X-ray regime (with photon energies around 1 keV) is thus feasible [31].
- 8.
A more involved quantum mechanical reasoning, based on the strong field approximation, leads to similar results [38].
- 9.
Without the initial tunnel ionization, as we saw in Chap. 3, the maximal kinetic energy that can be gained in the field is 2U p, and the cutoff for scattering initial conditions has to be adjusted accordingly.
- 10.
For simplicity, we can take a superposition with equal weights for the following purposes.
References
M. Weissbluth, Photon-Atom Interactions (Academic Press, New York, 1989)
E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1970)
I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals Series and Products, 5th edn. (Academic Press, New York, 1994)
R. Loudon, Am. J. Phys. 27, 649 (1959)
M. Andrews, Am. J. Phys. 34, 1194 (1966)
U. Schwengelbeck, F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 50, 632 (1994)
M. Andrews, Am. J. Phys. 44, 1064 (1976)
R. Blümel, W.P. Reinhardt, Chaos in Atomic Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)
J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5750 (1990)
F.A. Ilkov, J.E. Decker, S.L. Chin, J. Phys. B, At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 25, 4005 (1992)
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Lehrbuch der Theoretischen Physik, Vol. III: Quantenmechanik, 8th edn. (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1988)
M.V. Ammosov, N.B. Delone, V.P. Krainov, Sov. Phys. JETP 64, 1191 (1986)
L.V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965)
P. Lambropoulos, X. Tang, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. Suppl. 1, 335 (1992)
G. van de Sand, J.M. Rost, Phys. Rev. A 62, 053403 (2000)
G. van de Sand, Semiklassische Dynamik in starken Laserfeldern. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, 1999
P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray, G. Petite, N.K. Rahman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1127 (1979)
D.B. Milosevic, G.G. Paulus, D. Bauer, W. Becker, J. Phys. B 39, R203 (2006)
H.R. Reiss, Opt. Express 8, 99 (2001)
R. Grobe, C.K. Law, Phys. Rev. A 44, R4114 (1991)
R.R. Jones, D. You, P.H. Bucksbaum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1236 (1993)
D.S. Citrin, Opt. Express 1, 376 (1997)
M.T. Frey, F.B. Dunning, C.O. Reinhold, S. Yoshida, J. Burgdörfer, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1434 (1999)
D. Dimitrovski, E.A. Solov’ev, J.S. Briggs, Phys. Rev. A 72, 043411 (2005)
R. Gebarowski, J. Phys. B, At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30, 2143 (1997)
C.L. Stokely, J.C. Lancaster, F.B. Dunning, D.G. Arbó, C.O. Reinhold, J. Burgdörfer, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013403 (2003)
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz, Lehrbuch der Theoretischen Physik, Vol. I: Mechanik, 10th edn. (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1981)
S. Yoshida, F. Grossmann, E. Persson, J. Burgdörfer, Phys. Rev. A 69, 043410 (2004)
S. Yoshida, Quantum chaos in the periodically kicked Rydberg atom. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1999
N.T. Maitra, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 531 (2000)
J. Seres, E. Seres, A.J. Verhoef, G. Tempea, C. Streli, P. Wobrauschek, V. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, C. Spielmann, F. Krausz, Nature 433, 596 (2005)
M. Protopapas, C.H. Keitel, P.L. Knight, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 389 (1997). And Refs. therein
P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993)
A. Pukhov, S. Gordienko, T. Baeva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173002 (2003)
K. Burnett, V.C. Reed, J. Cooper, P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3347 (1992)
V. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 153901 (2003)
M. Protopapas, D.G. Lappas, C.H. Keitel, P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 53, R2933 (1996)
M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M.Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994)
T. Kreibich, M. Lein, V. Engel, E.K.U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 103901 (2001)
G. van de Sand, J.M. Rost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 524 (1999)
R. Abrines, I.C. Percival, Proc. Phys. Soc. A 88, 861 (1966)
C. Zagoya, C.M. Goletz, F. Grossmann, J.M. Rost, New J. Phys. 14, 093050 (2012)
B.H. Bransden, C.J. Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules, 2nd edn. (Pearson Education, Harlow, 2003)
C.J. Joachain, N.J. Kylstra, R.M. Potvliege, Atoms in Intense Laser Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)
S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995)
M.V. Fedorov, Atomic and Free Electrons in a Strong Light Field (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997). And Refs. therein
J.R. Oppenheimer, Phys. Rev. 13, 66 (1928)
A.M. Perelomov, V.S. Popov, M.V. Terent’ev, Sov. Phys. JETP 50, 1393 (1966)
A. Wirth, M.T. Hassan, I. Grguraš, J. Gagnon, A. Moulet, T.T. Luu, S. Pabst, R. Santra, Z.A. Alahmed, A.M. Azzeer, V.S. Yakovlev, V. Pervak, F. Krausz, E. Goulielmakis, Science 334, 195 (2011)
T. Millack, V. Véniard, J. Henkel, Phys. Lett. A 176, 433 (1993)
M. Pont, N.R. Walet, M. Gavrila, C.W. McCurdy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 939 (1988)
L.E. Reichl, The Transition to Chaos, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 2004)
J.E. Bayfield, Quantum Evolution: An Introduction to Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1999)
J.M. Dahlström, A. L’Huillier, A. Maquet, J. Phys. B 45, 183001 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix: More on Atomic Units
Appendix: More on Atomic Units
There is a close connection between atomic units and some expectation values of the hydrogen atom. The Bohr radius, e.g., is related to the expectation value of the position operator in the ground state which is given by
and in addition the maximum of the probability density for finding the particle in the ground state with a radial separation r from the nucleus is at a 0 [2]. Furthermore, the energy constructed from the atomic base units is twice the absolute value of the ground state energy \(E_{1}=-\frac{1}{2}\mbox{ a.u.}\approx-13.6\mbox{ eV}\). One could also measure energy in terms of the ionization potential
of hydrogen, however. The corresponding units are so-called Rydberg units (1 a.u.=2 Rydberg), in contrast to the atomic or Hartree units.
The atomic unit for velocity follows most easily by considering the quantum mechanical virial theorem [2], which for the hydrogen atom can be stated as
For the ground state we find with its help that
and with the definition
the atomic velocity unit \(v_{0}=\sqrt{2|E_{1}|/m_{\mathrm{e}}}\approx c\sqrt{27.212 \mbox{ eV}/0.511 \mbox{ MeV}}\) is related to the vacuum speed of light via v 0=cα=1 a.u. with the fine structure constant α≈1/137. Using v 0 and a 0 the atomic unit of time is formed via t 0=a 0/v 0≈24 as. The oscillation period of the electron on the Bohr orbit is therefore given by T e=2π a.u.
The most important unit for this book is the one for the electric field which is given by \({\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{at}}\approx5.1427\cdot10^{11}\mbox{ V}\,\mbox{m}^{-1}\). This is the value of the electric field, due to the proton, experienced by the electron at the Bohr radius. The intensity that corresponds to that field is \(I_{\mathrm{at}}=\frac{c\varepsilon_{0}{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm {at}}^{2}}{2}\approx 3.5101\cdot10^{16}\mbox{ W}\,\mbox{cm}^{-2}\). An overview of the units mentioned can be found in Table 4.1. As an example, we use this table to convert frequency into wave length. For frequencies given in a.u. (ω=X a.u.), the wave length (in SI units) is
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grossmann, F. (2013). Single Electron Atoms in Strong Laser Fields. In: Theoretical Femtosecond Physics. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00606-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00606-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00605-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00606-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)